Short T G, Galletly D C
Department of Anaesthesia, Wellington School of Medicine, New Zealand.
Anaesth Intensive Care. 1989 May;17(2):151-6. doi: 10.1177/0310057X8901700205.
Oral premedication with midazolam 7.5 mg was compared with temazepam 20 mg in a double-blind study of sixty patients undergoing day-stay urological surgery. One hour following ingestion similar degrees of anxiolysis and sedation were reported by patients for both compounds. However, midazolam was observed by anaesthetists to produce the greater anxiolytic effect and was given the better overall assessment. Midazolam produced significantly greater amnesia both at the time of induction and 30 minutes postoperatively. At the time of discharge four hours postoperatively no significant difference could be observed in psychomotor performance or subjective sedation although on the evening of surgery the temazepam group had a greater incidence of sleepiness and an earlier time to retiring. Although the differences were small, the residual post-discharge effects of temazepam lead us to conclude that midazolam 7.5 mg is the more suitable premedicant for outpatient use.
在一项针对60例行日间泌尿外科手术患者的双盲研究中,对口服7.5毫克咪达唑仑进行术前用药与口服20毫克替马西泮进行了比较。服药1小时后,患者报告两种药物产生的抗焦虑和镇静程度相似。然而,麻醉师观察到咪达唑仑产生的抗焦虑效果更强,总体评估也更好。咪达唑仑在诱导时和术后30分钟产生的遗忘作用明显更强。术后4小时出院时,在精神运动表现或主观镇静方面未观察到显著差异,尽管在手术当晚,替马西泮组嗜睡发生率更高,上床睡觉时间更早。尽管差异很小,但替马西泮出院后的残留效应使我们得出结论,7.5毫克咪达唑仑更适合作为门诊患者的术前用药。