Niederberger Thomas D, Sohm Jill A, Gunderson Troy E, Parker Alexander E, Tirindelli Joëlle, Capone Douglas G, Carpenter Edward J, Cary Stephen C
College of Marine and Earth Sciences, University of Delaware Lewes, DE, USA.
Wrigley Institute for Environmental Studies and Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Front Microbiol. 2015 Jan 28;6:9. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00009. eCollection 2015.
During the summer months, wet (hyporheic) soils associated with ephemeral streams and lake edges in the Antarctic Dry Valleys (DVs) become hotspots of biological activity and are hypothesized to be an important source of carbon and nitrogen for arid DV soils. Recent research in the DV has focused on the geochemistry and microbial ecology of lakes and arid soils, with substantially less information being available on hyporheic soils. Here, we determined the unique properties of hyporheic microbial communities, resolved their relationship to environmental parameters and compared them to archetypal arid DV soils. Generally, pH increased and chlorophyll a concentrations decreased along transects from wet to arid soils (9.0 to ~7.0 for pH and ~0.8 to ~5 μg/cm(3) for chlorophyll a, respectively). Soil water content decreased to below ~3% in the arid soils. Community fingerprinting-based principle component analyses revealed that bacterial communities formed distinct clusters specific to arid and wet soils; however, eukaryotic communities that clustered together did not have similar soil moisture content nor did they group together based on sampling location. Collectively, rRNA pyrosequencing indicated a considerably higher abundance of Cyanobacteria in wet soils and a higher abundance of Acidobacterial, Actinobacterial, Deinococcus/Thermus, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Gemmatimonadetes, Nitrospira, and Planctomycetes in arid soils. The two most significant differences at the genus level were Gillisia signatures present in arid soils and chloroplast signatures related to Streptophyta that were common in wet soils. Fungal dominance was observed in arid soils and Viridiplantae were more common in wet soils. This research represents an in-depth characterization of microbial communities inhabiting wet DV soils. Results indicate that the repeated wetting of hyporheic zones has a profound impact on the bacterial and eukaryotic communities inhabiting in these areas.
在夏季,南极干谷(DVs)中与季节性溪流和湖岸相关的湿润(潜流)土壤成为生物活动的热点区域,据推测这些土壤是干旱的DV土壤中碳和氮的重要来源。近期在DV地区的研究主要集中在湖泊和干旱土壤的地球化学及微生物生态学方面,而关于潜流土壤的信息则少得多。在此,我们确定了潜流微生物群落的独特特性,解析了它们与环境参数的关系,并将其与典型的干旱DV土壤进行了比较。一般来说,沿着从湿润土壤到干旱土壤的样带,pH值升高,叶绿素a浓度降低(pH值从9.0到约7.0,叶绿素a浓度从约0.8到约5μg/cm³)。干旱土壤中的土壤含水量降至约3%以下。基于群落指纹图谱的主成分分析表明,细菌群落形成了特定于干旱和湿润土壤的不同聚类;然而,聚集在一起的真核生物群落既没有相似的土壤湿度含量,也没有根据采样地点进行分组。总体而言,rRNA焦磷酸测序表明,湿润土壤中蓝细菌的丰度显著更高,而干旱土壤中酸杆菌、放线菌、嗜热栖热放线菌、拟杆菌、厚壁菌、芽单胞菌、硝化螺旋菌和浮霉菌的丰度更高。在属水平上,两个最显著的差异是干旱土壤中存在的吉氏菌特征以及与链形植物相关的叶绿体特征,后者在湿润土壤中很常见。在干旱土壤中观察到真菌占优势,而绿藻门在湿润土壤中更为常见。这项研究对栖息在湿润DV土壤中的微生物群落进行了深入表征。结果表明,潜流带的反复湿润对栖息在这些区域的细菌和真核生物群落有深远影响。