• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Human language reveals a universal positivity bias.人类语言显示出一种普遍的积极偏向。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Feb 24;112(8):2389-94. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1411678112. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
2
Positivity of the English language.英语的积极性。
PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e29484. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029484. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
3
Emotional sound symbolism: Languages rapidly signal valence via phonemes.情绪声音象征:语言通过音位快速传递情感。
Cognition. 2018 Jun;175:122-130. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.02.007. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
4
Affect across adulthood: Evidence from English, Dutch, and Spanish.成年期的情感变化:来自英语、荷兰语和西班牙语的证据。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Apr;150(4):792-812. doi: 10.1037/xge0000950.
5
Quantifying the information in the long-range order of words: semantic structures and universal linguistic constraints.量化词的长程顺序中的信息:语义结构与普遍语言限制
Cortex. 2014 Jun;55:5-16. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.08.008. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
6
Frequency of word-use predicts rates of lexical evolution throughout Indo-European history.词汇使用频率预测了整个印欧语系历史中的词汇演变速度。
Nature. 2007 Oct 11;449(7163):717-20. doi: 10.1038/nature06176.
7
Large-scale evidence of dependency length minimization in 37 languages.37种语言中依存长度最小化的大规模证据。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Aug 18;112(33):10336-41. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1502134112. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
8
Experiencing versus contemplating: Language use during descriptions of awe and wonder.体验与思考:描述敬畏和惊奇时的语言使用。
Cogn Emot. 2016 Sep;30(6):1188-96. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1042836. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
9
The English word disgust has no exact translation in Hindi or Malayalam.英语单词“disgust”在印地语或马拉雅拉姆语中没有确切的翻译。
Cogn Emot. 2017 Sep;31(6):1169-1180. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2016.1202200. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
10
The embodiment of emotional words in a second language: An eye-movement study.第二语言中情感词汇的体现:一项眼动研究。
Cogn Emot. 2016;30(3):488-500. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1018144. Epub 2015 Mar 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Positive mental states and their relation to psychosocial resources: protocol of a systematic review focusing on cultural moderators.积极心理状态及其与社会心理资源的关系:一项聚焦文化调节因素的系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 13;15(8):e103821. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103821.
2
The influence of individual differences in the processing of words expressing discrete emotions: data from a large-scale study.表达离散情绪的词汇加工中个体差异的影响:来自一项大规模研究的数据。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 11;15(1):25036. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10310-9.
3
The alignment model of indirect communication.间接沟通的对齐模型。
PLoS One. 2025 May 28;20(5):e0323839. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323839. eCollection 2025.
4
Unveiling the cognitive burden: The impact of stigma on distorted thinking among individuals living with hepatitis B.揭示认知负担:耻辱感对乙型肝炎患者扭曲思维的影响。
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2025 Jan-Mar;25(1):100556. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2025.100556. Epub 2025 Mar 2.
5
Language measures correlate with other measures used to study emotion.语言测量与用于研究情绪的其他测量方法相关。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Feb 22;3(1):29. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00212-x.
6
Emotion regulation elicits cross-linguistically shared and language-specific forms of linguistic distancing.情绪调节会引发跨语言共享和语言特有的语言疏远形式。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 30;14(1):22605. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73440-6.
7
How does emotional content influence visual word recognition? A meta-analysis of valence effects.情绪内容如何影响视觉单词识别?一项关于效价效应的元分析。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Apr;32(2):570-587. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02555-8. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
8
Negative online news articles are shared more to social media.负面的网络新闻文章在社交媒体上被分享得更多。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 16;14(1):21592. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71263-z.
9
The role of individual differences in emotional word recognition: Insights from a large-scale lexical decision study.个体差异在情绪词汇识别中的作用:来自大规模词汇判断研究的启示。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec;56(8):8501-8520. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02488-z. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
10
Language Preference and its Moderating Role in Coping with Stress: The Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos.语言偏好及其在应对压力中的调节作用:西班牙裔社区健康研究/拉丁裔研究
Med Res Arch. 2023 Oct;11(10). doi: 10.18103/mra.v11i10.4625. Epub 2023 Oct 26.

本文引用的文献

1
The Effect of Language on Economic Behavior: Evidence from Savings Rates, Health Behaviors, and Retirement Assets.语言对经济行为的影响:来自储蓄率、健康行为和退休资产的证据。
Am Econ Rev. 2013 Apr;103(2):690-731. doi: 10.1257/aer.103.2.690.
2
Affective biases in English are bi-dimensional.英语中的情感偏见是二维的。
Cogn Emot. 2015;29(7):1147-67. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2014.968098. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
3
The geography of happiness: connecting twitter sentiment and expression, demographics, and objective characteristics of place.幸福地理学:连接推特情绪和表达、人口统计学以及地点的客观特征。
PLoS One. 2013 May 29;8(5):e64417. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064417. Print 2013.
4
Positivity of the English language.英语的积极性。
PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e29484. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029484. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
5
Temporal patterns of happiness and information in a global social network: hedonometrics and Twitter.全球社交网络中的快乐和信息的时间模式:快乐计量学和 Twitter。
PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e26752. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026752. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
6
Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books.利用数百万本数字化书籍进行文化的定量分析。
Science. 2011 Jan 14;331(6014):176-82. doi: 10.1126/science.1199644. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
7
The secret life of pronouns: flexibility in writing style and physical health.代词的隐秘生活:写作风格与身体健康的灵活性
Psychol Sci. 2003 Jan;14(1):60-5. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.01419.

人类语言显示出一种普遍的积极偏向。

Human language reveals a universal positivity bias.

作者信息

Dodds Peter Sheridan, Clark Eric M, Desu Suma, Frank Morgan R, Reagan Andrew J, Williams Jake Ryland, Mitchell Lewis, Harris Kameron Decker, Kloumann Isabel M, Bagrow James P, Megerdoomian Karine, McMahon Matthew T, Tivnan Brian F, Danforth Christopher M

机构信息

Computational Story Lab, Vermont Advanced Computing Core, and the Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05401; Vermont Complex Systems Center, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05401;

Center for Computational Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139;

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Feb 24;112(8):2389-94. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1411678112. Epub 2015 Feb 9.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.1411678112
PMID:25675475
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4345622/
Abstract

Using human evaluation of 100,000 words spread across 24 corpora in 10 languages diverse in origin and culture, we present evidence of a deep imprint of human sociality in language, observing that (i) the words of natural human language possess a universal positivity bias, (ii) the estimated emotional content of words is consistent between languages under translation, and (iii) this positivity bias is strongly independent of frequency of word use. Alongside these general regularities, we describe interlanguage variations in the emotional spectrum of languages that allow us to rank corpora. We also show how our word evaluations can be used to construct physical-like instruments for both real-time and offline measurement of the emotional content of large-scale texts.

摘要

通过对来自10种起源和文化各异的语言的24个语料库中的100,000个单词进行人工评估,我们提供了人类社会性在语言中深刻印记的证据,观察到:(i)自然人类语言的单词具有普遍的积极偏向;(ii)翻译中不同语言之间单词的估计情感内容是一致的;(iii)这种积极偏向与单词使用频率强烈无关。除了这些一般规律,我们还描述了语言情感频谱中的跨语言差异,这些差异使我们能够对语料库进行排名。我们还展示了如何使用我们的单词评估来构建类似物理仪器的工具,用于实时和离线测量大规模文本的情感内容。