Capps Benjamin, Bailey Michele Marie, Bickford David, Coker Richard, Lederman Zohar, Lover Andrew, Lysaght Tamra, Tambyah Paul
Bioethics. 2015 Oct;29(8):588-96. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12145. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
Pandemic plans recommend phases of response to an emergent infectious disease (EID) outbreak, and are primarily aimed at preventing and mitigating human-to-human transmission. These plans carry presumptive weight and are increasingly being operationalized at the national, regional and international level with the support of the World Health Organization (WHO). The conventional focus of pandemic preparedness for EIDs of zoonotic origin has been on public health and human welfare. However, this focus on human populations has resulted in strategically important disciplinary silos. As the risks of zoonotic diseases have implications that reach across many domains outside traditional public health, including anthropological, environmental, and veterinary fora, a more inclusive ecological perspective is paramount for an effective response to future outbreaks.
大流行计划建议了应对突发传染病（EID）疫情的各个阶段，其主要目标是预防和减轻人际传播。这些计划具有推定效力，并且在世界卫生组织（WHO）的支持下，越来越多地在国家、区域和国际层面实施。传统上，针对人畜共患源性EID的大流行防范重点一直放在公共卫生和人类福祉上。然而，这种对人类群体的关注导致了具有战略重要性的学科孤岛。由于人畜共患疾病的风险所涉及的范围超出了传统公共卫生领域，包括人类学、环境和兽医领域，因此，一个更具包容性的生态视角对于有效应对未来疫情至关重要。
