Emwas Abdul-Hamid M
Imaging and Characterization Core Lab, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia,
Methods Mol Biol. 2015;1277:161-93. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2377-9_13.
Mass spectrometry (MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) have evolved as the most common techniques in metabolomics studies, and each brings its own advantages and limitations. Unlike MS spectrometry, NMR spectroscopy is quantitative and does not require extra steps for sample preparation, such as separation or derivatization. Although the sensitivity of NMR spectroscopy has increased enormously and improvements continue to emerge steadily, this remains a weak point for NMR compared with MS. MS-based metabolomics provides an excellent approach that can offer a combined sensitivity and selectivity platform for metabolomics research. Moreover, different MS approaches such as different ionization techniques and mass analyzer technology can be used in order to increase the number of metabolites that can be detected. In this chapter, the advantages, limitations, strengths, and weaknesses of NMR and MS as tools applicable to metabolomics research are highlighted.
质谱(MS)和核磁共振(NMR)已发展成为代谢组学研究中最常用的技术,且每种技术都有其自身的优缺点。与质谱不同,核磁共振光谱是定量的,并且不需要额外的样品制备步骤,如分离或衍生化。尽管核磁共振光谱的灵敏度已大幅提高且仍在稳步改进,但与质谱相比,这仍是核磁共振的一个弱点。基于质谱的代谢组学提供了一种出色的方法,可为代谢组学研究提供一个兼具灵敏度和选择性的平台。此外,可以使用不同的质谱方法,如不同的电离技术和质量分析器技术,以增加可检测代谢物的数量。在本章中,将重点介绍核磁共振和质谱作为适用于代谢组学研究的工具的优点、局限性、长处和短处。