• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学习的代价:记忆发展中的干扰效应

The cost of learning: interference effects in memory development.

作者信息

Darby Kevin P, Sloutsky Vladimir M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Apr;144(2):410-31. doi: 10.1037/xge0000051. Epub 2015 Feb 16.

DOI:10.1037/xge0000051
PMID:25688907
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4388774/
Abstract

Learning often affects future learning and memory for previously learned information by exerting either facilitation or interference effects. Several theoretical accounts of interference effects have been proposed, each making different developmental predictions. This research examines interference effects across development, with the goal of better understanding mechanisms of interference and of memory development. Preschool-aged children and adults participated in a 3-phased associative learning paradigm containing stimuli that were either unique or repeated across phases. Both age groups demonstrated interference effects, but only for repeated items. Whereas proactive interference effects were comparable across age groups, retroactive interference reached catastrophic-like levels in children. Additionally, retroactive interference increased in adults when contextual differences between phases were minimized (Experiment 2), and decreased in adults who were more successful at encoding repeated pairs of stimuli during a training phase (Experiment 3). These results are discussed with respect to theories of memory and memory development.

摘要

学习常常通过施加促进或干扰效应来影响未来对先前所学信息的学习和记忆。关于干扰效应已经提出了几种理论解释,每种解释都做出了不同的发展预测。本研究考察了不同发展阶段的干扰效应,目的是更好地理解干扰机制和记忆发展机制。学龄前儿童和成年人参与了一个三阶段的联想学习范式,其中包含在各阶段中要么是独特的要么是重复的刺激。两个年龄组都表现出干扰效应,但仅针对重复项目。虽然前摄干扰效应在各年龄组中相当,但儿童的倒摄干扰达到了类似灾难性的水平。此外,当各阶段之间的情境差异最小化时,成年人的倒摄干扰增加(实验2),而在训练阶段对重复刺激对进行编码更成功的成年人中,倒摄干扰减少(实验3)。将根据记忆理论和记忆发展理论对这些结果进行讨论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76f8/4388774/217821c0f2f4/nihms656106f10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76f8/4388774/df3d0821f8e3/nihms656106f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76f8/4388774/f2aece05d498/nihms656106f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76f8/4388774/bea54d0bbf67/nihms656106f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76f8/4388774/bcc442af96c9/nihms656106f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76f8/4388774/d56d1b76d47a/nihms656106f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76f8/4388774/89920fa69458/nihms656106f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76f8/4388774/a44a1f14787f/nihms656106f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76f8/4388774/4e52039aa6b8/nihms656106f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76f8/4388774/41cadf212f99/nihms656106f9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76f8/4388774/217821c0f2f4/nihms656106f10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76f8/4388774/df3d0821f8e3/nihms656106f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76f8/4388774/f2aece05d498/nihms656106f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76f8/4388774/bea54d0bbf67/nihms656106f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76f8/4388774/bcc442af96c9/nihms656106f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76f8/4388774/d56d1b76d47a/nihms656106f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76f8/4388774/89920fa69458/nihms656106f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76f8/4388774/a44a1f14787f/nihms656106f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76f8/4388774/4e52039aa6b8/nihms656106f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76f8/4388774/41cadf212f99/nihms656106f9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76f8/4388774/217821c0f2f4/nihms656106f10.jpg

相似文献

1
The cost of learning: interference effects in memory development.学习的代价:记忆发展中的干扰效应
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Apr;144(2):410-31. doi: 10.1037/xge0000051. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
2
Modeling age differences in effects of pair repetition and proactive interference using a single parameter.使用单个参数对成对重复和前摄干扰的影响进行年龄差异建模。
Psychol Aging. 2018 Feb;33(1):182-194. doi: 10.1037/pag0000195.
3
Age-related changes in overcoming proactive interference in associative memory: The role of PFC-mediated executive control processes at retrieval.与年龄相关的联想记忆中克服前摄干扰的变化:在提取过程中前额叶皮层介导的执行控制过程的作用。
Neuroimage. 2016 May 15;132:116-128. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.017. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
4
Developmental differences in memory for cross-modal associations.跨模态关联记忆的发展差异。
Dev Sci. 2009 Nov;12(6):1054-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00857.x.
5
Development differences in associative memory: strategy use, mental effort, and knowledge access interactions.联想记忆的发展差异:策略运用、心理努力与知识获取的相互作用
Adv Child Dev Behav. 1994;25:7-32. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(08)60049-x.
6
The role of reminding in retroactive effects of memory for older and younger adults.提醒在老年人和年轻人记忆回溯效应中的作用。
Psychol Aging. 2020 Aug;35(5):697-709. doi: 10.1037/pag0000427.
7
Interference and integration: the fan effect in children and adults.
Memory. 2003 Nov;11(6):505-23. doi: 10.1080/09658210244000090.
8
Neocortical catastrophic interference in healthy and amnesic adults: a paradoxical matter of time.健康成年人与失忆成年人的新皮质灾难性干扰:一个关于时间的矛盾问题。
Hippocampus. 2014 Dec;24(12):1653-62. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22353. Epub 2014 Sep 10.
9
The effects of item familiarity on the neural correlates of successful associative memory encoding.项目熟悉度对成功关联记忆编码的神经关联的影响。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2015 Dec;15(4):889-900. doi: 10.3758/s13415-015-0359-2.
10
Stepping back from 'persistence and relapse' to see the forest: Associative interference.从“持续存在和复发”中抽身以观全貌:联想干扰。
Behav Processes. 2017 Aug;141(Pt 1):128-136. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.03.014. Epub 2017 Mar 18.

引用本文的文献

1
A little imprecision goes a long way in launching memory development.在启动记忆发展方面,些许不精确会产生很大影响。
Child Dev Perspect. 2025 Sep;19(3):139-145. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12536. Epub 2024 Nov 9.
2
Differentiation of Related Events in Hippocampus Supports Memory Reinstatement in Development.海马体中相关事件的分化支持发育过程中的记忆恢复。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2025 Apr 1;37(4):853-894. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02299.
3
Potential interactive effect of positive expectancy violation and sleep on memory consolidation in dogs.积极预期违背与睡眠对犬记忆巩固的潜在交互作用。

本文引用的文献

1
Children's episodic memory.儿童情景记忆
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2011 Jul;2(4):365-373. doi: 10.1002/wcs.114. Epub 2010 Sep 22.
2
The development of episodic memory: items, contexts, and relations.情景记忆的发展:项目、情境及关系
Psychol Sci. 2013 Nov 1;24(11):2163-72. doi: 10.1177/0956797613487385. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
3
Susceptibility to Memory Interference Effects following Frontal Lobe Damage: Findings from Tests of Paired-Associate Learning.前额叶损伤后对记忆干扰效应的易感性:来自配对联想学习测试的结果。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 25;14(1):9487. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60166-8.
4
Can't get it out of my head: Proactive interference in the visual working memory of 3- to 8-year-old children.无法将其从我的脑海中抹去:3至8岁儿童视觉工作记忆中的前摄干扰。
Dev Psychol. 2024 Mar;60(3):582-594. doi: 10.1037/dev0001686.
5
Reliability of the serial reaction time task: If at first you don't succeed, try, try, try again.序列反应时任务的可靠性:如果一开始你没有成功,那就再试一次,再试一次,再试一次。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Nov;77(11):2256-2282. doi: 10.1177/17470218241232347. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
6
When Time Shifts the Boundaries: Isolating the Role of Forgetting in Children's Changing Category Representations.当时间改变界限:分离遗忘在儿童不断变化的类别表征中的作用。
J Mem Lang. 2023 Oct;132. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2023.104447. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
7
Sex Does Not Sell: The Effect of Sexual Content on Advertisement Effectiveness and Interference with Memory for Program Information.性不吸引人:性内容对广告效果的影响及其对节目信息记忆的干扰。
Percept Mot Skills. 2023 Feb;130(1):149-169. doi: 10.1177/00315125221138395. Epub 2022 Nov 6.
8
Integrative Brain Dynamics in Childhood Bullying Victimization: Cognitive and Emotional Convergence Associated With Stress Psychopathology.童年期受欺凌的综合脑动力学:与应激心理病理学相关的认知和情感趋同
Front Integr Neurosci. 2022 Apr 27;16:782154. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2022.782154. eCollection 2022.
9
Intraobject and extraobject memory binding across early development.跨早期发展的内客体和外客体记忆绑定。
Dev Psychol. 2022 Jul;58(7):1237-1253. doi: 10.1037/dev0001355. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
10
Transparency, replicability, and discovery in cognitive aging research: A computational modeling approach.认知老化研究中的透明度、可复制性和可发现性:一种计算建模方法。
Psychol Aging. 2022 Feb;37(1):10-29. doi: 10.1037/pag0000665.
J Cogn Neurosci. 1995 Spring;7(2):144-52. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1995.7.2.144.
4
Same, varied, or both? Contextual support aids young children in generalizing category labels.相同、多样还是兼具?语境支持帮助幼儿泛化类别标签。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2013 May;115(1):150-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.11.011. Epub 2013 Mar 1.
5
Redundancy matters: flexible learning of multiple contingencies in infants.冗余很重要:婴儿对多种偶然性的灵活学习。
Cognition. 2013 Feb;126(2):156-64. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.09.016. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
6
How chunks, long-term working memory and templates offer a cognitive explanation for neuroimaging data on expertise acquisition: a two-stage framework.块、长期工作记忆和模板如何为专长获取的神经影像学数据提供认知解释:两阶段框架。
Brain Cogn. 2012 Aug;79(3):221-44. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2012.01.010. Epub 2012 Apr 29.
7
Bayes and blickets: effects of knowledge on causal induction in children and adults.贝叶斯和布莱基茨:知识对儿童和成人因果推理的影响。
Cogn Sci. 2011 Nov-Dec;35(8):1407-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01203.x. Epub 2011 Oct 4.
8
Small worlds and semantic network growth in typical and late talkers.典型和晚期语言者的小世界和语义网络增长。
PLoS One. 2011 May 11;6(5):e19348. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019348.
9
The development of automatic and controlled inhibitory retrieval processes in true and false recall.自动和控制抑制检索过程在真和假回忆中的发展。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 May;109(1):91-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.01.001. Epub 2011 Feb 12.
10
Retrieval-induced forgetting in young children.儿童的提取诱发遗忘。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Oct;17(5):704-9. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.5.704.