Judson Marc A, Chaudhry Haroon, Louis Amanda, Lee Kevin, Yucel Recai
Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA.
Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA.
Respir Med. 2015 Apr;109(4):526-31. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2015.01.019. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
Both sarcoidosis and its treatment may worsen health related quality of life (HRQoL). We performed a propensity analysis of sarcoidosis-specific HRQoL patient reported outcome measures (PRO) to disentangle the effects of sarcoidosis and corticosteroid therapy on HRQoL in sarcoidosis outpatients.
Consecutive outpatient sarcoidosis patients were administered modules from two sarcoidosis-specific HRQoL PROs: the Sarcoidosis Health Questionnaire (SHQ) and the Sarcoidosis Assessment Tool (SAT). Patients were divided into those that received ≤500 mg of prednisone (PRED-LOW) versus >500 mg of prednisone (PRED-HIGH) over the previous year. SAT and SHQ scores were initially compared in the two corticosteroid groups. Then a multivariate analysis was performed using a propensity score analysis adjusted for race, age, gender and the severity of illness.
In the unadjusted analysis, the PRED-HIGH group demonstrated the following worse HRQoL scores compared to the LOW-PRED group: SHQ Daily (p = 0.02), SAT satisfaction (p = 0.03), SAT daily activities (p = 0.03). In the propensity analysis, the following domains demonstrated worse HRQoL in the PRED-HIGH group than the PRED-LOW group: SAT fatigue (p < 0.0001), SAT daily activities (p = 0.03), SAT satisfaction (p = 0.03). All these differences exceeded the established minimum important difference for these SAT domains. The SHQ Physical score appeared to demonstrate a borderline improved HRQoL in the PRED-HIGH versus the PRED-LOW group (p = 0.05).). In a post-hoc exploratory analysis, the presence of cardiac sarcoidosis may have explained the quality of life differences between the two corticosteroid groups.
Our cohort of sarcoidosis clinic patients who received ≤500 mg of prednisone in the previous year had an improved HRQoL compared to patients receiving >500 mg on the basis of two sarcoidosis-specific PROs after adjusting for severity of illness. These data support the need to measure HRQoL in sarcoidosis trials, and suggest that the search should continue for effective alternative medications to corticosteroids.
结节病及其治疗均可能使健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)恶化。我们对结节病特异性HRQoL患者报告结局指标(PRO)进行了倾向分析,以厘清结节病和皮质类固醇疗法对结节病门诊患者HRQoL的影响。
连续纳入的结节病门诊患者接受了来自两种结节病特异性HRQoL PRO的模块评估:结节病健康问卷(SHQ)和结节病评估工具(SAT)。根据患者在前一年接受泼尼松剂量≤500mg(低剂量泼尼松组,PRED-LOW)还是>500mg(高剂量泼尼松组,PRED-HIGH)进行分组。首先比较两组皮质类固醇治疗患者的SAT和SHQ评分。然后使用倾向评分分析进行多变量分析,并对种族、年龄、性别和疾病严重程度进行校正。
在未校正分析中,与低剂量泼尼松组相比,高剂量泼尼松组在以下方面的HRQoL评分更差:SHQ日常评分(p = 0.02)、SAT满意度评分(p = 0.03)、SAT日常活动评分(p = 0.03)。在倾向分析中,与低剂量泼尼松组相比,高剂量泼尼松组在以下领域的HRQoL更差:SAT疲劳评分(p < 0.0001)、SAT日常活动评分(p = 0.03)、SAT满意度评分(p = 0.03)。所有这些差异均超过了这些SAT领域已确定的最小重要差异。SHQ身体评分显示,高剂量泼尼松组与低剂量泼尼松组相比,HRQoL似乎有临界改善(p = 0.05)。在事后探索性分析中,心脏结节病的存在可能解释了两组皮质类固醇治疗患者生活质量的差异。
根据两种结节病特异性PRO,在对疾病严重程度进行校正后,我们队列中前一年接受≤500mg泼尼松治疗的结节病门诊患者与接受>500mg泼尼松治疗的患者相比,HRQoL有所改善。这些数据支持在结节病试验中测量HRQoL的必要性,并表明应继续寻找有效的皮质类固醇替代药物。