• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[德国西北部听力障碍的患病率。听力状况的流行病学研究(HÖRSTAT)结果]

[Prevalence of hearing impairment in northwestern Germany. Results of an epidemiological study on hearing status (HÖRSTAT)].

作者信息

von Gablenz P, Holube I

机构信息

Institut für Hörtechnik und Audiologie, Jade Hochschule und Exzellenzcluster Hearing4All, Ofener Str. 16/19, 26121, Oldenburg, Deutschland,

出版信息

HNO. 2015 Mar;63(3):195-214. doi: 10.1007/s00106-014-2949-7.

DOI:10.1007/s00106-014-2949-7
PMID:25720301
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A pure-tone average of 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz in the better ear (PTA-4) is the international standard criterion set by the World Health Organization (WHO) to describe hearing loss. Presently, there are no epidemiological data on hearing loss in Germany based on this criterion.

METHODS

A representative sample of adults from Oldenburg and Emden were invited for a hearing assessment. This article analyzes the association between hearing loss and age, sex, noise, occupation, and educational level. Age- and sex-specific prevalence rates following the WHO classification are compared with international findings.

RESULTS

According to the WHO classification, the prevalence of hearing impairment in the study cohort (n=1,866) is approx. 16%. In men, who more commonly work in noisy jobs, a higher prevalence rate is observed than in women of the same age. Nevertheless, sex differences in the present study are smaller than those reported in most international studies. PTA-4 is approximately the same for men and women when effects of occupational noise are controlled, but differences in prevalence between occupational areas are still significant.

CONCLUSION

Compared with international findings, age-specific prevalence rates in HÖRSTAT are low. In the synopsis of epidemiological studies of the past 25 years, a trend toward decreasing prevalence in middle and higher age groups can be observed.

摘要

背景

较好耳0.5、1、2和4千赫兹的纯音平均听阈(PTA-4)是世界卫生组织(WHO)设定的用于描述听力损失的国际标准指标。目前,德国尚无基于该标准的听力损失流行病学数据。

方法

邀请来自奥尔登堡和埃姆登的具有代表性的成年样本进行听力评估。本文分析了听力损失与年龄、性别、噪声、职业和教育水平之间的关联。将遵循WHO分类的特定年龄和性别的患病率与国际研究结果进行比较。

结果

根据WHO分类,研究队列(n = 1866)中听力障碍的患病率约为16%。在更常从事噪声工作的男性中,观察到的患病率高于同龄女性。然而,本研究中的性别差异小于大多数国际研究报告的差异。在控制职业噪声影响后,男性和女性的PTA-4大致相同,但不同职业领域的患病率差异仍然显著。

结论

与国际研究结果相比,HÖRSTAT中特定年龄的患病率较低。在过去25年的流行病学研究综述中,可以观察到中高年龄组患病率呈下降趋势。

相似文献

1
[Prevalence of hearing impairment in northwestern Germany. Results of an epidemiological study on hearing status (HÖRSTAT)].[德国西北部听力障碍的患病率。听力状况的流行病学研究(HÖRSTAT)结果]
HNO. 2015 Mar;63(3):195-214. doi: 10.1007/s00106-014-2949-7.
2
Prevalence of hearing loss in Northern and Southern Germany.德国北部和南部听力损失的患病率。
HNO. 2017 Aug;65(Suppl 2):130-135. doi: 10.1007/s00106-016-0318-4.
3
[Prevalence of hearing loss in Northern and Southern Germany. German version].[德国北部和南部听力损失的患病率。德文版]
HNO. 2017 Aug;65(8):663-670. doi: 10.1007/s00106-016-0314-8.
4
Social inequalities in pure-tone hearing assessed using occupational stratification schemes.使用职业分层方案评估的纯音听力方面的社会不平等。
Int J Audiol. 2017 Jul;56(7):443-452. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1294767. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
5
Hearing in a 54- to 66-year-old population in northern Finland.芬兰北部 54 至 66 岁人群的听力状况。
Int J Audiol. 2010 Dec;49(12):920-7. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2010.510146. Epub 2010 Sep 14.
6
Occupation and the risk of hearing impairment--results from the Nord-Trøndelag study on hearing loss.职业与听力损伤风险——来自特隆赫姆听力损失研究的结果。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2010 May;36(3):250-7. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2887. Epub 2009 Dec 18.
7
Three decade change in the prevalence of hearing impairment and its association with diabetes in the United States.美国 30 年来听力障碍的患病率变化及其与糖尿病的关系。
Prev Med. 2009 Nov;49(5):360-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.07.021. Epub 2009 Aug 5.
8
Assessment of hearing loss by pure-tone audiometry in patients with mucopolysaccharidoses.通过纯音测听评估黏多糖贮积症患者的听力损失。
Mol Genet Metab. 2014 Apr;111(4):533-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2014.02.003. Epub 2014 Feb 16.
9
Survey of hearing disorders in an urban population in Rondonia, Northern Brazil.巴西北部朗多尼亚州城市人口听力障碍调查。
Rev Saude Publica. 2013 Apr;47(2):309-15. doi: 10.1590/S0034-8910.2013047004059.
10
Gender-specific hearing loss in German adults aged 18 to 84 years compared to US-American and current European studies.与美国和当前欧洲研究相比,18 至 84 岁德国成年人的性别特异性听力损失。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 23;15(4):e0231632. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231632. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Hearing systems in squad athletes: Where otology meets sports medicine.运动队运动员的听力系统:耳科学与运动医学的交汇点。
Sci Prog. 2025 Jul-Sep;108(3):368504251372793. doi: 10.1177/00368504251372793. Epub 2025 Sep 4.
2
No association between age-related hearing loss and brain age derived from structural neuroimaging data.源自结构神经影像学数据的年龄相关性听力损失与脑龄之间无关联。
Neuroimage Rep. 2021 Jun 5;1(2):100020. doi: 10.1016/j.ynirp.2021.100020. eCollection 2021 Jun.
3
Expensive today but cheaper tomorrow: lifetime costs of an active middle ear implant compared to alternative treatment options.

本文引用的文献

1
Internationally comparable screening tests for listening in noise in several European languages: the German digit triplet test as an optimization prototype.几种欧洲语言在噪声环境下听力筛查测试的国际可比性:作为优化原型的德语数字三音测试。
Int J Audiol. 2012 Sep;51(9):697-707. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2012.690078. Epub 2012 Jul 4.
2
Hearing loss prevalence in the United States.美国听力损失患病率。
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Nov 14;171(20):1851-2. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.506.
3
Prevalence of age-related hearing loss in Europe: a review.
今日昂贵,明日便宜:与其他治疗方案相比,有源中耳植入物的终身成本
Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Jul;26(5):797-816. doi: 10.1007/s10198-024-01743-6. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
4
Hearing impairment amongst people with Osteogenesis Imperfecta in Germany.德国成骨不全症患者中的听力障碍
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Feb;282(2):765-771. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08983-5. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
5
Differential cortical activation patterns: pioneering sub-classification of tinnitus with and without hyperacusis by combining audiometry, gamma oscillations, and hemodynamics.不同的皮质激活模式:通过结合听力测定、伽马振荡和血液动力学对伴有和不伴有听觉过敏的耳鸣进行开创性的亚分类。
Front Neurosci. 2024 Jan 4;17:1232446. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1232446. eCollection 2023.
6
Age standardization and time-of-day performance for the Oldenburg Sentence Test (OLSA): results from the population-based Gutenberg Health Study.年龄标准化和 Oldenburg 句子测试(OLSA)的时间表现:基于人群的古腾堡健康研究的结果。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 May;281(5):2341-2351. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08358-2. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
7
Update on hearing impairment in later life : Clinical and psychosocial implications.老年听力障碍最新进展:临床及社会心理影响
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2023 Jul;56(4):259-260. doi: 10.1007/s00391-023-02197-w. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
8
Extended Preoperative Audiometry for Outcome Prediction and Risk Analysis in Patients Receiving Cochlear Implants.用于人工耳蜗植入患者结局预测和风险分析的术前扩展听力测定法
J Clin Med. 2023 May 3;12(9):3262. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093262.
9
The Prevalence of Hearing Loss and Provision With Hearing Aids in the Gutenberg Health Study.《古腾堡健康研究中听力损失的患病率和助听器的提供情况》
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2023 Feb 17;120(Forthcoming):99-106. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2022.0385.
10
[Effectiveness of hearing aid provision for severe hearing loss].[为重度听力损失患者提供助听器的有效性]
HNO. 2022 Jul;70(7):520-532. doi: 10.1007/s00106-021-01139-5. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
欧洲与年龄相关的听力损失的流行率:综述。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Aug;268(8):1101-1107. doi: 10.1007/s00405-011-1597-8. Epub 2011 Apr 17.
4
Hearing loss prevalence and risk factors among older adults in the United States.美国老年人听力损失的患病率及相关风险因素。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2011 May;66(5):582-90. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glr002. Epub 2011 Feb 27.
5
The prevalence of hearing impairment and associated risk factors: the Beaver Dam Offspring Study.听力障碍的患病率及相关危险因素:比弗代尔后代研究
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 May;137(5):432-9. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2011.15. Epub 2011 Feb 21.
6
Americans hear as well or better today compared with 40 years ago: hearing threshold levels in the unscreened adult population of the United States, 1959-1962 and 1999-2004.与 40 年前相比,现在的美国人听力水平没有下降甚至更好:1959-1962 年和 1999-2004 年美国未筛查的成年人群体的听力阈值水平。
Ear Hear. 2010 Dec;31(6):725-34. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181e9770e.
7
Estimating the effect of occupational noise exposure on hearing thresholds: the importance of adjusting for confounding variables.估算职业噪声暴露对听力阈值的影响:调整混杂变量的重要性。
Ear Hear. 2010 Apr;31(2):234-7. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181c6b9fd.
8
Occupation and the risk of hearing impairment--results from the Nord-Trøndelag study on hearing loss.职业与听力损伤风险——来自特隆赫姆听力损失研究的结果。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2010 May;36(3):250-7. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2887. Epub 2009 Dec 18.
9
Generational differences in the prevalence of hearing impairment in older adults.老年人听力障碍的发生率在不同世代间存在差异。
Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Jan 15;171(2):260-6. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp370. Epub 2009 Dec 15.
10
Prevalence of hearing loss and differences by demographic characteristics among US adults: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2004.美国成年人听力损失的患病率及按人口统计学特征划分的差异:来自1999 - 2004年国家健康和营养检查调查的数据
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Jul 28;168(14):1522-30. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.14.1522.