Bajaj Neeti, Tandon Shobha
Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, PDM Dental College and Research Institute, Bahadurgarh, Haryana, India.
Int J Ayurveda Res. 2011 Jan;2(1):29-36. doi: 10.4103/0974-7788.83188.
The objective of this study was to ascertain the effects of a mouthwash prepared with Triphala on dental plaque, gingival inflammation, and microbial growth and compare it with commercially available Chlorhexidine mouthwash. This study was conducted after ethics committee approval and written consent from guardians (and assent from the children) were obtained. A total of 1431 students in the age group 8-12 years, belonging to classes fourth to seventh, were the subjects for this study. The Knowledge, Attitude and Practice (KAP) of the subjects was determined using a questionnaire. The students were divided into three groups namely, Group I (n = 457) using Triphala mouthwash (0.6%), Group II (n = 440) using Chlorhexidine mouthwash (0.1%) (positive control), and Group III (n = 412) using distilled water (negative control). The assessment was carried out on the basis of plaque scores, gingival scores, and the microbiological analysis (Streptococcus and lactobacilli counts). Statistical analysis for plaque and gingival scores was conducted using the paired sample t-test (for intragroup) and the Tukey's test (for intergroup conducted along with analysis of variance test). For the Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus counts, Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney test were applied for intragroup and intergroup comparison, respectively. All the tests were carried out using the SPSS software. Both the Group I and Group II showed progressive decrease in plaque scores from baseline to the end of 9 months; however, for Group III increase in plaque scores from the baseline to the end of 9 months was noted. Both Group I and Group II showed similar effect on gingival health. There was inhibitory effect on microbial counts except Lactobacillus where Triphala had shown better results than Chlorhexidine. It was concluded that there was no significant difference between the Triphala and the Chlorhexidine mouthwash.
本研究的目的是确定用三果药制备的漱口水对牙菌斑、牙龈炎症和微生物生长的影响,并将其与市售的洗必泰漱口水进行比较。本研究在获得伦理委员会批准并得到监护人的书面同意(以及儿童的同意)后进行。共有1431名年龄在8至12岁、就读于四年级至七年级的学生作为本研究的对象。使用问卷确定受试者的知识、态度和行为(KAP)。学生被分为三组,即第一组(n = 457)使用三果药漱口水(0.6%),第二组(n = 440)使用洗必泰漱口水(0.1%)(阳性对照),第三组(n = 412)使用蒸馏水(阴性对照)。根据菌斑评分、牙龈评分和微生物分析(链球菌和乳酸菌计数)进行评估。菌斑和牙龈评分的统计分析使用配对样本t检验(组内)和Tukey检验(组间,与方差分析一起进行)。对于变形链球菌和乳酸菌计数,分别应用Wilcoxon检验和Mann-Whitney检验进行组内和组间比较。所有测试均使用SPSS软件进行。第一组和第二组从基线到9个月末菌斑评分均呈逐渐下降趋势;然而,第三组从基线到9个月末菌斑评分有所增加。第一组和第二组对牙龈健康的影响相似。除乳酸菌外,对微生物计数有抑制作用,其中三果药的效果优于洗必泰。得出的结论是,三果药漱口水和洗必泰漱口水之间没有显著差异。