Suppr超能文献

种族/民族与医疗过度使用:一项系统综述

Race/Ethnicity and overuse of care: a systematic review.

作者信息

Kressin Nancy R, Groeneveld Peter W

机构信息

VA Boston Healthcare System; Boston University School of Medicine.

出版信息

Milbank Q. 2015 Mar;93(1):112-38. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12107.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

POLICY POINTS: Racial/ethnic differences in the overuse of care (specifically, unneeded care that does not improve patients' outcomes) have received little scholarly attention. Our systematic review of the literature (59 studies) found that the overuse of care is not invariably associated with race/ethnicity, but when it was, a substantial proportion of studies found greater overuse of care among white patients. The absence of established subject terms in PubMed for the overuse of care or inappropriate care impedes the ability of researchers or policymakers to synthesize prior scientific or policy efforts.

CONTEXT

The literature on disparities in health care has examined the contrast between white patients receiving needed care, compared with racial/ethnic minority patients not receiving needed care. Racial/ethnic differences in the overuse of care, that is, unneeded care that does not improve patients' outcomes, have received less attention. We systematically reviewed the literature regarding race/ethnicity and the overuse of care.

METHODS

We searched the Medline database for US studies that included at least 2 racial/ethnic groups and that examined the association between race/ethnicity and the overuse of procedures, diagnostic (care) or therapeutic care. In a recent review, we identified studies of overuse by race/ethnicity, and we also examined reference lists of retrieved articles. We then abstracted and evaluated this information, including the population studied, data source, sample size and assembly, type of care, guideline or appropriateness standard, controls for clinical confounding and financing of care, and findings.

FINDINGS

We identified 59 unique studies, of which 11 had a low risk of methodological bias. Studies with multiple outcomes were counted more than once; collectively they assessed 74 different outcomes. Thirty-two studies, 6 with low risks of bias (LRoB), provided evidence that whites received more inappropriate or nonrecommended care than racial/ethnic minorities did. Nine studies (2 LRoB) found evidence of more overuse of care by minorities than by whites. Thirty-three studies (6 LRoB) found no relationship between race/ethnicity and overuse.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the overuse of care is not invariably associated with race/ethnicity, when it was, a substantial proportion of studies found greater overuse of care among white patients. Clinicians and researchers should try to understand how and why race/ethnicity might be associated with overuse and to intervene to reduce it.

摘要

未标注

政策要点:医疗服务过度使用(具体而言,即对改善患者预后并无帮助的不必要医疗服务)方面的种族/族裔差异很少受到学术关注。我们对文献进行的系统综述(共59项研究)发现,医疗服务过度使用并非总是与种族/族裔相关,但即便存在关联,相当一部分研究发现白人患者的医疗服务过度使用情况更为严重。在PubMed中,缺乏针对医疗服务过度使用或不适当医疗服务的确立主题词,这妨碍了研究人员或政策制定者整合先前的科学或政策成果。

背景

关于医疗保健差异的文献研究了接受必要医疗服务的白人患者与未接受必要医疗服务的种族/族裔少数群体患者之间的对比情况。而医疗服务过度使用方面的种族/族裔差异,即对改善患者预后并无帮助的不必要医疗服务,受到的关注较少。我们对有关种族/族裔与医疗服务过度使用的文献进行了系统综述。

方法

我们在Medline数据库中搜索了美国的研究,这些研究至少纳入了两个种族/族裔群体,并考察了种族/族裔与医疗程序过度使用、诊断(医疗服务)或治疗性医疗服务之间的关联。在最近的一项综述中我们确定了按种族/族裔划分的过度使用研究,并且还查阅了检索文章的参考文献列表。然后我们提取并评估了这些信息,包括所研究的人群、数据来源、样本量及构成、医疗服务类型、指南或适宜性标准、临床混杂因素的控制及医疗服务的资金来源,以及研究结果。

研究结果

我们确定了59项独特的研究,其中11项研究存在方法学偏倚的风险较低。具有多个结果的研究被多次计数;它们总共评估了74个不同的结果。32项研究(6项偏倚风险较低)提供的证据表明,白人比种族/族裔少数群体接受了更多不适当或不推荐使用的医疗服务。9项研究(2项偏倚风险较低)发现少数群体比白人存在更多医疗服务过度使用的证据。33项研究(6项偏倚风险较低)发现种族/族裔与医疗服务过度使用之间没有关系。

结论

尽管医疗服务过度使用并非总是与种族/族裔相关,但即便存在关联,相当一部分研究发现白人患者的医疗服务过度使用情况更为严重。临床医生和研究人员应努力了解种族/族裔可能与医疗服务过度使用相关的方式及原因,并进行干预以减少这种情况。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Overuse and systems of care: a systematic review.过度使用和医疗体系:系统评价。
Med Care. 2013 Jun;51(6):503-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31828dbafe.
5
Assessing bias in studies of prognostic factors.评估预后因素研究中的偏倚。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Feb 19;158(4):280-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-4-201302190-00009.
7
A piece of my mind. Mind the outcomes.一吐为快。留意结果。
JAMA. 2013 Jan 2;309(1):39-40. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.153826.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验