• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Research Agenda: The Effects of Responsible-Conduct-of-Research Training on Attitudes.研究议程:科研行为规范培训对态度的影响
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2015 Dec;10(5):457-9. doi: 10.1177/1556264615575514. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
2
Effectiveness of a responsible conduct of research course: a preliminary study.科研行为规范课程的有效性:一项初步研究。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2007 Jun;13(2):249-64. doi: 10.1007/s11948-007-9012-y. Epub 2007 Jun 19.
3
Student perceptions of the effectiveness of education in the responsible conduct of research.学生对科研行为责任教育有效性的看法。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2006 Jul;12(3):571-82. doi: 10.1007/s11948-006-0055-2.
4
Responding to challenges in educating for the responsible conduct of research.应对科研行为责任教育中的挑战。
Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):870-5. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f77fe.
5
Rescuing responsible conduct of research (RCR) education.拯救负责任的研究行为(RCR)教育。
Account Res. 2014;21(1):68-83. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2013.822271.
6
Teaching and learning responsible research conduct: influences of prior experiences on acceptance of new ideas.负责任的研究行为的教学与学习:先前经验对新观念接受度的影响
Account Res. 2008 Jan-Mar;15(1):30-62. doi: 10.1080/08989620701783758.
7
"Reported Goals of Instructors of Responsible Conduct of Research for Teaching of Skills".研究负责任行为指导教师在技能教学方面的报告目标
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2013 Dec;8(5):82. doi: 10.1525/jer.2013.8.5.82.
8
Educational approaches to the responsible conduct of clinical research: an exploratory study.临床研究负责任行为的教育方法:一项探索性研究。
Acad Med. 2007 Jan;82(1):32-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ACM.0000250032.13438.bc.
9
Reported goals for responsible conduct of research courses.已报告的关于负责任的研究课程行为的目标。
Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):846-52. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f78bf.
10
Discourses of dislike: responses to ethics education policies by life scientists in the U.K., Italy, and the U.S.厌恶之辞:英国、意大利和美国生命科学家对伦理教育政策的回应
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2009 Jun;4(2):49-57. doi: 10.1525/jer.2009.4.2.49.

引用本文的文献

1
Medical students' interest in research: changing trends during university training.医学生对研究的兴趣:大学培训期间的变化趋势
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Oct 19;10:1257574. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1257574. eCollection 2023.
2
Reliability and validation of an attitude scale regarding responsible conduct in research.研究行为负责任态度量表的信度和效度。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 16;17(3):e0265392. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265392. eCollection 2022.
3
The Use of Questionable Research Practices to Survive in Academia Examined With Expert Elicitation, Prior-Data Conflicts, Bayes Factors for Replication Effects, and the Bayes Truth Serum.运用专家意见征询、先验数据冲突、复制效应的贝叶斯因子以及贝叶斯真相血清对学术界为求生存而采用的可疑研究行为进行考察。
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 29;12:621547. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.621547. eCollection 2021.
4
Development and Validation of a Biobank Questionnaire Intended for the Public in the Arab Region.阿拉伯地区公众用生物银行问卷的制定与验证。
Biopreserv Biobank. 2021 Oct;19(5):422-431. doi: 10.1089/bio.2021.0032. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
5
Development and Preliminary Validation of a New Measure of Values in Scientific Work.发展和初步验证科学工作价值观的新测量工具。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Apr;24(2):393-418. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9896-0. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
6
Making Professional Decisions in Research: Measurement and Key Predictors.研究中的专业决策:测量与关键预测因素
Account Res. 2016;23(5):288-308. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2016.1171149.

本文引用的文献

1
A brief history of RCR education.RCR 教育简史。
Account Res. 2013;20(5-6):380-94. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2013.822260.
2
Reported goals of instructors of responsible conduct of research for teaching of skills.报告了负责科研行为指导教师在技能教学方面的目标。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2013 Apr;8(2):95-103. doi: 10.1525/jer.2013.8.2.95.
3
Evaluating the effects that existing instruction on responsible conduct of research has on ethical decision making.评估现有关于负责任研究行为的指导对道德决策的影响。
Acad Med. 2010 Mar;85(3):519-26. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181cd1cc5.
4
Evidence-based research ethics.循证研究伦理
Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):85-7. doi: 10.1080/15265160902923457.
5
Reported Goals For Knowledge to be Learned in Responsible Conduct of Research Courses.研究课程责任行为中要学习的知识的报告目标。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2007 Jun;2(2):57-66. doi: 10.1525/jer.2007.2.2.57.
6
Teaching and learning responsible research conduct: influences of prior experiences on acceptance of new ideas.负责任的研究行为的教学与学习:先前经验对新观念接受度的影响
Account Res. 2008 Jan-Mar;15(1):30-62. doi: 10.1080/08989620701783758.
7
Reported goals for responsible conduct of research courses.已报告的关于负责任的研究课程行为的目标。
Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):846-52. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f78bf.
8
Effectiveness of a responsible conduct of research course: a preliminary study.科研行为规范课程的有效性:一项初步研究。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2007 Jun;13(2):249-64. doi: 10.1007/s11948-007-9012-y. Epub 2007 Jun 19.
9
Student perceptions of the effectiveness of education in the responsible conduct of research.学生对科研行为责任教育有效性的看法。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2006 Jul;12(3):571-82. doi: 10.1007/s11948-006-0055-2.

研究议程:科研行为规范培训对态度的影响

Research Agenda: The Effects of Responsible-Conduct-of-Research Training on Attitudes.

作者信息

Kalichman Michael W, Plemmons Dena K

机构信息

University of California, San Diego, USA

University of California, San Diego, USA.

出版信息

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2015 Dec;10(5):457-9. doi: 10.1177/1556264615575514. Epub 2015 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1177/1556264615575514
PMID:25752981
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5207776/
Abstract

Requirements for training in responsible conduct of research have significantly increased over the past 25 years, despite the absence of evidence for a substantial impact. One of the challenges has been to choose among the many possible goals that might define outcomes. Although much of the focus of research has been on changes in knowledge or skills, a case can be made that attitudes and perceptions are at least as important. Based on a recently completed pilot study, the authors propose several areas for research to clarify not only what but also how attitudes and perceptions would be usefully assessed.

摘要

在过去25年里,对科研行为责任培训的要求显著提高,尽管缺乏实质性影响的证据。其中一个挑战是在众多可能定义成果的目标中做出选择。虽然研究的大部分重点都放在知识或技能的变化上,但可以说态度和观念至少同样重要。基于最近完成的一项试点研究,作者提出了几个研究领域,以不仅阐明态度和观念是什么,而且阐明如何对其进行有效评估。