• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对认知障碍的过程质量指标,以支持急诊科认知障碍老年人的护理质量。

Process quality indicators targeting cognitive impairment to support quality of care for older people with cognitive impairment in emergency departments.

作者信息

Schnitker Linda M, Martin-Khan Melinda, Burkett Ellen, Beattie Elizabeth R A, Jones Richard N, Gray Len C

机构信息

The Centre for Research in Geriatric Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Mar;22(3):285-98. doi: 10.1111/acem.12616.

DOI:10.1111/acem.12616
PMID:25754937
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to develop process quality indicators (PQIs) to support the improvement of care services for older people with cognitive impairment in emergency departments (ED).

METHODS

A structured research approach was taken for the development of PQIs for the care of older people with cognitive impairment in EDs, including combining available evidence with expert opinion (phase 1), a field study (phase 2), and formal voting (phase 3). A systematic review of the literature identified ED processes targeting the specific care needs of older people with cognitive impairment. Existing relevant PQIs were also included. By integrating the scientific evidence and clinical expertise, new PQIs were drafted and, along with the existing PQIs, extensively discussed by an advisory panel. These indicators were field tested in eight hospitals using a cohort of older persons aged 70 years and older. After analysis of the field study data (indicator prevalence, variability across sites), in a second meeting, the advisory panel further defined the PQIs. The advisory panel formally voted for selection of those PQIs that were most appropriate for care evaluation.

RESULTS

In addition to seven previously published PQIs relevant to the care of older persons, 15 new indicators were created. These 22 PQIs were then field tested. PQIs designed specifically for the older ED population with cognitive impairment were only scored for patients with identified cognitive impairment. Following formal voting, a total of 11 PQIs were included in the set. These PQIs targeted cognitive screening, delirium screening, delirium risk assessment, evaluation of acute change in mental status, delirium etiology, proxy notification, collateral history, involvement of a nominated support person, pain assessment, postdischarge follow-up, and ED length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

This article presents a set of PQIs for the evaluation of the care for older people with cognitive impairment in EDs. The variation in indicator triggering across different ED sites suggests that there are opportunities for quality improvement in care for this vulnerable group. Applied PQIs will identify an emergency services' implementation of care strategies for cognitively impaired older ED patients. Awareness of the PQI triggers at an ED level enables implementation of targeted interventions to improve any suboptimal processes of care. Further validation and utility of the indicators in a wider population is now indicated.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是制定过程质量指标(PQIs),以支持改善急诊科(ED)中认知障碍老年人的护理服务。

方法

采用结构化研究方法来制定急诊科中认知障碍老年人护理的PQIs,包括将现有证据与专家意见相结合(第一阶段)、实地研究(第二阶段)和正式投票(第三阶段)。对文献进行系统综述,确定针对认知障碍老年人特定护理需求的急诊科流程。还纳入了现有的相关PQIs。通过整合科学证据和临床专业知识,起草了新的PQIs,并与现有的PQIs一起由一个咨询小组进行广泛讨论。这些指标在八家医院对70岁及以上的老年人群体进行了实地测试。在分析实地研究数据(指标患病率、各地点的变异性)后,咨询小组在第二次会议上进一步确定了PQIs。咨询小组正式投票选出最适合护理评估的那些PQIs。

结果

除了七个先前发表的与老年人护理相关的PQIs外,还创建了15个新指标。然后对这22个PQIs进行了实地测试。专门为急诊科中有认知障碍的老年人群体设计的PQIs仅对已确定有认知障碍的患者进行评分。经过正式投票,该组中总共纳入了11个PQIs。这些PQIs针对认知筛查、谵妄筛查、谵妄风险评估、精神状态急性变化评估、谵妄病因、代理人通知、旁证病史、指定支持人员的参与、疼痛评估、出院后随访以及急诊科住院时间。

结论

本文提出了一组用于评估急诊科中认知障碍老年人护理的PQIs。不同急诊科地点指标触发情况的差异表明,对这一弱势群体的护理质量有改进的机会。应用PQIs将确定急诊服务部门对认知障碍老年急诊科患者护理策略的实施情况。在急诊科层面了解PQI触发因素能够实施有针对性的干预措施,以改善任何不理想的护理流程。现在表明需要在更广泛的人群中对这些指标进行进一步验证和实用性评估。

相似文献

1
Process quality indicators targeting cognitive impairment to support quality of care for older people with cognitive impairment in emergency departments.针对认知障碍的过程质量指标,以支持急诊科认知障碍老年人的护理质量。
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Mar;22(3):285-98. doi: 10.1111/acem.12616.
2
Structural quality indicators to support quality of care for older people with cognitive impairment in emergency departments.支持急诊科认知障碍老年人护理质量的结构质量指标。
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Mar;22(3):273-84. doi: 10.1111/acem.12617.
3
An assistant workforce to improve screening rates and quality of care for older patients in the emergency department: findings of a pre- post, mixed methods study.辅助劳动力提高急诊科老年患者的筛查率和护理质量:一项前后混合方法研究的结果。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 May 30;18(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0811-6.
4
Quality indicators for geriatric emergency care.老年急诊护理质量指标
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 May;16(5):441-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00382.x. Epub 2009 Mar 30.
5
Methodology for developing quality indicators for the care of older people in the Emergency Department.为急诊科老年患者护理制定质量指标的方法。
BMC Emerg Med. 2013 Dec 6;13:23. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-13-23.
6
What is the evidence to guide best practice for the management of older people with cognitive impairment presenting to emergency departments? A systematic review.对于急诊科收治的认知障碍老年人,指导最佳管理实践的证据有哪些?一项系统综述。
Adv Emerg Nurs J. 2013 Apr-Jun;35(2):154-69. doi: 10.1097/TME.0b013e31828c7f4a.
7
The effect of mental status screening on the care of elderly emergency department patients.精神状态筛查对老年急诊科患者护理的影响。
Ann Emerg Med. 2003 May;41(5):678-84. doi: 10.1067/mem.2003.152.
8
Validation of the 6-Item Cognitive Impairment Test and the 4AT test for combined delirium and dementia screening in older Emergency Department attendees.验证 6 项认知障碍测试和 4AT 测试在老年急诊科就诊者中联合用于谵妄和痴呆筛查的有效性。
Age Ageing. 2018 Jan 1;47(1):61-68. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx149.
9
The prevalence and documentation of impaired mental status in elderly emergency department patients.老年急诊科患者精神状态受损的患病率及记录情况。
Ann Emerg Med. 2002 Mar;39(3):248-53. doi: 10.1067/mem.2002.122057.
10
Contextual factors influencing success or failure of emergency department interventions for cognitively impaired older people: a scoping and integrative review.影响认知障碍老年人急诊科干预成功或失败的情境因素:范围界定和综合评价。
J Adv Nurs. 2011 Jul;67(7):1426-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05611.x. Epub 2011 Mar 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Dementia Ideal Care: Ecosystem Map of Best Practices and Care Pathways Enhanced by Technology and Community.痴呆症理想照护:通过技术和社区增强的最佳实践和照护路径生态系统图谱。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2024;100(1):87-117. doi: 10.3233/JAD-231491.
2
Developing a set of emergency department performance measures to evaluate delirium care quality for older adults: a modified e-Delphi study.制定一套急诊科绩效评估指标,以评估老年人谵妄护理质量:一项改良的电子德尔菲研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Feb 15;24(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-00947-6.
3
Emergency Department Length of Stay for Older Adults With Dementia.
老年痴呆症患者在急诊科的停留时间。
Ann Emerg Med. 2024 May;83(5):446-456. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.09.022. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
4
Protocol for developing a set of performance measures to monitor and evaluate delirium care quality for older adults in the emergency department using a modified e-Delphi process.制定一套使用改良电子德尔菲法监测和评估急诊科老年患者谵妄护理质量的绩效指标的方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 22;13(8):e074730. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074730.
5
CELPI: trial protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a Carer End of Life Planning Intervention in people dying with dementia.CELPI:一项针对痴呆症临终患者的照顾者临终计划干预的随机对照试验的试验方案。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Nov 16;22(1):869. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03534-1.
6
Optimal Emergency Department Care Practices for Persons Living With Dementia: A Scoping Review.优化痴呆患者的急诊护理实践:范围综述。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Aug;23(8):1314.e1-1314.e29. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.05.024.
7
Selecting Performance Indicators and Targets in Health Care: An International Scoping Review and Standardized Process Framework.医疗保健领域绩效指标与目标的选择:一项国际范围综述及标准化流程框架
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022 Apr 21;15:747-764. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S357561. eCollection 2022.
8
Emergency Department Care Transitions for Patients With Cognitive Impairment: A Scoping Review.急诊科认知障碍患者的就诊流程转接:综述
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Aug;23(8):1313.e1-1313.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.01.076. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
9
Delirium Prevention, Detection, and Treatment in Emergency Medicine Settings: A Geriatric Emergency Care Applied Research (GEAR) Network Scoping Review and Consensus Statement.急危重症医学环境中谵妄的预防、检测和治疗:老年急诊护理应用研究 (GEAR) 网络范围界定综述和共识声明。
Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Jan;28(1):19-35. doi: 10.1111/acem.14166. Epub 2020 Dec 12.
10
Quality indicators for a geriatric emergency care (GeriQ-ED) - an evidence-based delphi consensus approach to improve the care of geriatric patients in the emergency department.老年急诊质量指标(GeriQ-ED)——一种基于证据的德尔菲共识方法,旨在改善急诊科老年患者的护理。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 Jul 16;28(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00756-3.