Sircova Anna, Karimi Fariba, Osin Evgeny N, Lee Sungmin, Holme Petter, Strömbom Daniel
Department of Psychology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; Independent researcher, Copenhagen, Denmark.
IceLab, Department of Physics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 11;10(3):e0117612. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117612. eCollection 2015.
In a situation with a limited common resource, cooperation between individuals sharing the resource is essential. However, people often act upon self-interest in irrational ways that threaten the long-term survival of the whole group. A lack of sustainable or environmentally responsible behavior is often observed. In this study, we examine how the maximization of benefits principle works in a wider social interactive context of personality preferences in order to gain a more realistic insight into the evolution of cooperation. We used time perspective (TP), a concept reflecting individual differences in orientation towards past, present, or future, and relevant for making sustainable choices. We developed a personality-driven agent-based model that explores the role of personality in the outcomes of social dilemmas and includes multiple facets of diversity: (1) The agents have different behavior strategies: individual differences derived by applying cluster analysis to survey data from 22 countries (N = 10,940) and resulting in 7 cross-cultural profiles of TP; (2) The non-uniform distribution of the types of agents across countries; (3) The diverse interactions between the agents; and (4) diverse responses to those interactions in a well-mixed population. As one of the results, we introduced an index of overall cooperation for each of the 22 countries, which was validated against cultural, economic, and sustainability indicators (HDI, dimensions of national culture, and Environment Performance Index). It was associated with higher human development, higher individualism, lower power distance, and better environmental performance. The findings illustrate how individual differences in TP can be simulated to predict the ways people in different countries solve the personal vs. common gain dilemma in the global limited-resource situation. This interdisciplinary approach to social simulation can be adopted to explain the possible causes of global environmental issues and to predict their possible outcomes.
在共同资源有限的情况下,共享资源的个体之间的合作至关重要。然而,人们常常出于自身利益采取非理性行为,这威胁到整个群体的长期生存。人们常常缺乏可持续或对环境负责的行为。在本研究中,我们考察了利益最大化原则在更广泛的个性偏好社会互动背景下如何发挥作用,以便更现实地洞察合作的演变。我们使用了时间视角(TP),这一概念反映了个体在对过去、现在或未来的取向方面的差异,并且与做出可持续选择相关。我们开发了一个基于个性驱动的主体模型,该模型探讨个性在社会困境结果中的作用,并包括多样性的多个方面:(1)主体具有不同的行为策略:通过对来自22个国家(N = 10,940)的调查数据应用聚类分析得出个体差异,从而产生7种跨文化的TP概况;(2)不同类型主体在各国的分布不均匀;(3)主体之间的多样互动;以及(4)在充分混合的群体中对这些互动的多样反应。作为结果之一,我们为22个国家中的每一个引入了一个总体合作指数,该指数根据文化、经济和可持续性指标(人类发展指数、国家文化维度和环境绩效指数)进行了验证。它与更高的人类发展、更高的个人主义、更低的权力距离以及更好的环境绩效相关。研究结果说明了如何模拟TP中的个体差异,以预测不同国家的人们在全球有限资源情况下解决个人利益与共同利益困境的方式。这种社会模拟的跨学科方法可用于解释全球环境问题的可能原因并预测其可能结果。