Suppr超能文献

直接比较 MRI 和 X 射线 CT 技术在土壤根系 3D 成像中的应用:根系性状定量的潜力和挑战。

Direct comparison of MRI and X-ray CT technologies for 3D imaging of root systems in soil: potential and challenges for root trait quantification.

机构信息

Institute of Bio- and Geosciences, IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Wilhelm-Jonen- Str., 52425 Jülich, Germany.

Development Center X-Ray Technology EZRT, Fraunhofer Institute for Integrated Systems IIS, Flugplatzstraße 75, 90768 Fürth, Germany.

出版信息

Plant Methods. 2015 Mar 11;11:17. doi: 10.1186/s13007-015-0060-z. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Roots are vital to plants for soil exploration and uptake of water and nutrients. Root performance is critical for growth and yield of plants, in particular when resources are limited. Since roots develop in strong interaction with the soil matrix, tools are required that can visualize and quantify root growth in opaque soil at best in 3D. Two modalities that are suited for such investigations are X-ray Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Due to the different physical principles they are based on, these modalities have their specific potentials and challenges for root phenotyping. We compared the two methods by imaging the same root systems grown in 3 different pot sizes with inner diameters of 34 mm, 56 mm or 81 mm.

RESULTS

Both methods successfully visualized roots of two weeks old bean plants in all three pot sizes. Similar root images and almost the same root length were obtained for roots grown in the small pot, while more root details showed up in the CT images compared to MRI. For the medium sized pot, MRI showed more roots and higher root lengths whereas at some spots thin roots were only found by CT and the high water content apparently affected CT more than MRI. For the large pot, MRI detected much more roots including some laterals than CT.

CONCLUSIONS

Both techniques performed equally well for pots with small diameters which are best suited to monitor root development of seedlings. To investigate specific root details or finely graduated root diameters of thin roots, CT was advantageous as it provided the higher spatial resolution. For larger pot diameters, MRI delivered higher fractions of the root systems than CT, most likely because of the strong root-to-soil contrast achievable by MRI. Since complementary information can be gathered with CT and MRI, a combination of the two modalities could open a whole range of additional possibilities like analysis of root system traits in different soil structures or under varying soil moisture.

摘要

背景

根对于植物的土壤探索以及水分和养分的吸收至关重要。根系的表现对于植物的生长和产量至关重要,特别是在资源有限的情况下。由于根与土壤基质强烈相互作用,因此需要能够在最佳情况下以 3D 形式可视化和量化不透明土壤中根生长的工具。两种适合此类研究的模式是 X 射线计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)。由于它们基于不同的物理原理,这些模式在根系表型研究方面具有各自的潜力和挑战。我们通过对在直径为 34、56 和 81 毫米的 3 种不同花盆中生长的相同根系系统进行成像,比较了这两种方法。

结果

两种方法都成功地可视化了在所有 3 种花盆中生长了 2 周的豆苗的根系。在小盆中生长的根,两种方法获得的根图像和根长几乎相同,而 CT 图像中显示出更多的根细节。在中号花盆中,MRI 显示出更多的根和更高的根长,而在某些部位,只有 CT 检测到细根,高含水量显然对 CT 的影响比对 MRI 的影响更大。在大盆中,MRI 检测到的根比 CT 多,包括一些侧根。

结论

对于直径较小的花盆,两种技术都能很好地监测幼苗的根系发育,这些花盆最适合监测幼苗的根系发育。为了研究特定的根细节或细根的精细分级直径,CT 具有优势,因为它提供了更高的空间分辨率。对于较大的花盆直径,MRI 提供的根系部分比 CT 多,这很可能是因为 MRI 可以实现强大的根-土壤对比度。由于 CT 和 MRI 可以收集互补信息,因此两种模式的结合可以开辟一系列新的可能性,例如在不同的土壤结构或不同的土壤湿度下分析根系特征。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验