• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

礼貌对建议、领导力和绩效的影响。

The effects of civility on advice, leadership, and performance.

机构信息

McDonough School of Business, Georgetown University.

Department of Management, Technology and Strategy, Grenoble Ecole de Management.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2015 Sep;100(5):1527-41. doi: 10.1037/apl0000016. Epub 2015 Mar 23.

DOI:10.1037/apl0000016
PMID:25798552
Abstract

Workplace incivility is rampant and on the rise-with costs to individuals and organizations. Despite the increased need for civility, little is known about potential individual benefits of civility, defined as behavior involving politeness and regard for others in the workplace, within workplace norms for respect (Andersson & Pearson, 1999). Recent research has suggested that being civil may be hazardous to influence, power, and income (see Forni, 2002; Judge et al., 2012).Yet, throughout history, civil behavior has been extolled because it paid dividends to the person who behaved well. The focus of this research is whether that holds true in organizations. Using social exchange theory, we developed hypotheses about how civility benefits people, and investigated this in 2 studies. First, in a 2-wave social network study of a research and development department (n = 31) of a biotechnology firm, we found that people who perceived a colleague as civil would be more likely to seek that person out for work advice and to see that person as a leader. The more the individual was perceived as civil by others in his or her network, the better his or her performance. Being sought out for work advice and being viewed as a leader mediated this effect. In the second experiment (n = 162), we extended our understanding of what drove these benefits. We found that people who are civil were perceived as warm and competent, and these positive perceptions, in turn, helped to explain the benefits garnered. We discuss theoretical and practical implications.

摘要

工作场所的粗野行为猖獗且呈上升趋势,这给个人和组织都带来了损失。尽管人们对文明行为的需求日益增加,但对于文明行为(定义为在工作场所规范的尊重范围内涉及礼貌和尊重他人的行为)可能给个人带来的潜在好处却知之甚少。最近的研究表明,保持文明可能会对影响力、权力和收入造成危害(见 Forni,2002;Judge 等人,2012)。然而,纵观历史,文明行为一直受到赞扬,因为它给表现良好的人带来了回报。本研究的重点是这种情况在组织中是否成立。我们使用社会交换理论,提出了关于文明行为如何使人们受益的假设,并在两项研究中对此进行了调查。首先,我们对一家生物技术公司的研发部门(n = 31)进行了为期 2 波的社会网络研究,发现认为同事文明的人更有可能向该同事寻求工作建议,并认为该同事是领导者。个人在其网络中被他人认为越文明,他的表现就越好。寻求工作建议和被视为领导者会影响这种效果。在第二项实验中(n = 162),我们扩展了对驱动这些好处的因素的理解。我们发现,文明的人被认为是热情和有能力的,而这些积极的看法反过来又有助于解释所获得的好处。我们讨论了理论和实践意义。

相似文献

1
The effects of civility on advice, leadership, and performance.礼貌对建议、领导力和绩效的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Sep;100(5):1527-41. doi: 10.1037/apl0000016. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
2
Civility norms, safety climate, and safety outcomes: a preliminary investigation.文明规范、安全氛围与安全成果:一项初步调查。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2014 Oct;19(4):437-52. doi: 10.1037/a0037110. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
3
Development and Psychometric Testing of the Workplace Civility Index: A Reliable Tool for Measuring Civility in the Workplace.职场文明指数的开发与心理测量测试:一种测量职场文明程度的可靠工具。
J Contin Educ Nurs. 2018 Sep 1;49(9):400-406. doi: 10.3928/00220124-20180813-05.
4
Are anxious workers less productive workers? It depends on the quality of social exchange.焦虑的员工工作效率更低吗?这取决于社会交换的质量。
J Appl Psychol. 2016 Feb;101(2):279-91. doi: 10.1037/apl0000044. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
5
SUPERVISORS' TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP AND BULLYING IN THE WORKPLACE.主管的变革型领导与职场霸凌
Psychol Rep. 2015 Dec;117(3):724-33. doi: 10.2466/01.PR0.117c30z2.
6
Studying the relationships between authentic leadership, structural empowerment, and civility in the palliative care sector in Portugal.研究葡萄牙姑息治疗领域中的真实领导、结构赋权和文明之间的关系。
Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2022 Jan 18;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/LHS-06-2021-0060.
7
How leaders cultivate social capital and nurture employee vigor: implications for job performance.领导者如何培养社会资本和培养员工活力:对工作绩效的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Nov;94(6):1553-61. doi: 10.1037/a0016429.
8
Facilitating Eudaimonic Well-Being in Mental Health Care Organizations: The Role of Servant Leadership and Workplace Civility Climate.促进心理健康服务机构的幸福:仆人式领导和职场文明风气的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 12;17(4):1173. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041173.
9
The role of proximal social contexts: Assessing stigma-by-association effects on leader appraisals.近端社会环境的作用:评估关联污名对领导评价的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2016 Jan;101(1):68-85. doi: 10.1037/apl0000030. Epub 2015 Jun 22.
10
Exploring the effects of individual customer incivility encounters on employee incivility: the moderating roles of entity (in)civility and negative affectivity.探讨个体顾客无礼遭遇对员工无礼行为的影响:实体(不)礼貌和消极情感的调节作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2014 Jan;99(1):151-61. doi: 10.1037/a0034350. Epub 2013 Sep 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Servant Leadership on the Work Environment and the Attitudes and Behavior of Nursing Professionals as a Function of Gender: A Systematic Review.仆人式领导对工作环境以及护理专业人员态度和行为的影响:基于性别的函数关系——一项系统综述
J Nurs Manag. 2025 May 29;2025:8825138. doi: 10.1155/jonm/8825138. eCollection 2025.
2
Advice from artificial intelligence: a review and practical implications.人工智能的建议:综述与实际意义
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 8;15:1390182. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1390182. eCollection 2024.
3
Advancing Workplace Civility: a systematic review and meta-analysis of definitions, measurements, and associated factors.
促进职场文明:对定义、测量方法及相关因素的系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 9;14:1277188. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1277188. eCollection 2023.
4
The impact of interprofessional incivility on medical performance, service and patient care: a systematic review.跨专业不文明行为对医疗绩效、服务和患者护理的影响:一项系统综述。
Future Healthc J. 2023 Mar;10(1):69-77. doi: 10.7861/fhj.2022-0092.
5
What should I say? Testing ways to reduce fear and increase disclosure of incivility in reference checks.我该怎么说呢?测试减少恐惧和增加不文明行为在参考检查中的披露的方法。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 15;18(8):e0290011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290011. eCollection 2023.
6
The Influence of Health-Promoting Leadership on Employees' Positive Workplace Outcomes: The Mediating Role of Employability and the Moderating Role of Workplace Civility.促进健康的领导力对员工积极工作场所结果的影响:就业能力的中介作用和职场礼仪的调节作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 19;19(22):15300. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215300.
7
Being Virtuous Together: A One-Year Prospective Study on Organizational Virtuousness, Well-Being, and Organizational Commitment.共同践行美德:关于组织美德、幸福感与组织承诺的一年期前瞻性研究
Appl Res Qual Life. 2023;18(1):521-542. doi: 10.1007/s11482-022-10094-4. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
8
Role of Family Motivation, Workplace Civility and Self-Efficacy in Developing Affective Commitment and Organizational Citizenship Behavior.家庭动机、职场文明和自我效能感在培养情感承诺和组织公民行为中的作用。
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2020 Jan 7;10(1):358-374. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe10010027.
9
Being treated fairly in groups is important, but not sufficient: The role of distinctive treatment in groups, and its implications for mental health.在群体中受到公平对待很重要,但这还不够:群体中独特对待的作用,及其对心理健康的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 May 14;16(5):e0251871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251871. eCollection 2021.
10
Why East Asians but not South Asians are underrepresented in leadership positions in the United States.为什么在美国的领导层中,东亚人而非南亚人代表性不足。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Mar 3;117(9):4590-4600. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1918896117. Epub 2020 Feb 18.