Haugen Thomas, Tønnessen Espen, Øksenholt Øyvind, Haugen Fredrik Lie, Paulsen Gøran, Enoksen Eystein, Seiler Stephen
Norwegian Olympic Sports Program (Olympiatoppen), Sognsveien 228, 0840 Oslo, Norway; Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Agder, Gimlemoen 25, 4630 Kristiansand, Norway.
Norwegian Olympic Sports Program (Olympiatoppen), Sognsveien 228, 0840 Oslo, Norway.
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 23;10(3):e0121827. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121827. eCollection 2015.
The aims of the present study were to compare the effects of 1) training at 90 and 100% sprint velocity and 2) supervised versus unsupervised sprint training on soccer-specific physical performance in junior soccer players. Young, male soccer players (17 ± 1 yr, 71 ± 10 kg, 180 ± 6 cm) were randomly assigned to four different treatment conditions over a 7-week intervention period. A control group (CON, n = 9) completed regular soccer training according to their teams' original training plans. Three training groups performed a weekly repeated-sprint training session in addition to their regular soccer training sessions performed at A) 100% intensity without supervision (100UNSUP, n = 13), B) 90% of maximal sprint velocity with supervision (90SUP, n = 10) or C) 90% of maximal sprint velocity without supervision (90UNSUP, n=13). Repetitions x distance for the sprint-training sessions were 15 x 20 m for 100UNSUP and 30 x 20 m for 90SUP and 90UNSUP. Single-sprint performance (best time from 15 x 20 m sprints), repeated-sprint performance (mean time over 15 x 20 m sprints), countermovement jump and Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Level 1 (Yo-Yo IR1) were assessed during pre-training and post-training tests. No significant differences in performance outcomes were observed across groups. 90SUP improved Yo-Yo IR1 by a moderate margin compared to controls, while all other effect magnitudes were trivial or small. In conclusion, neither weekly sprint training at 90 or 100% velocity, nor supervised sprint training enhanced soccer-specific physical performance in junior soccer players.
1)以90%和100%冲刺速度进行训练;2)有监督与无监督的冲刺训练对青少年足球运动员特定于足球项目的身体表现的影响。年轻男性足球运动员(17±1岁,71±10千克,180±6厘米)在为期7周的干预期内被随机分配到四种不同的治疗条件。一个对照组(CON,n = 9)根据其球队的原始训练计划进行常规足球训练。三个训练组除了在常规足球训练课之外,还每周进行一次重复冲刺训练课,训练强度分别为:A)100%强度且无监督(100UNSUP,n = 13),B)最大冲刺速度的90%且有监督(90SUP,n = 10),或C)最大冲刺速度的90%且无监督(90UNSUP,n = 13)。冲刺训练课的重复次数×距离,100UNSUP组为15×20米,90SUP组和90UNSUP组为30×20米。在训练前和训练后的测试中评估单次冲刺表现(15×20米冲刺的最佳时间)、重复冲刺表现(15×20米冲刺的平均时间)、反向移动跳跃和Yo-Yo间歇恢复水平1(Yo-Yo IR1)。各小组在表现结果上未观察到显著差异。与对照组相比,90SUP组在Yo-Yo IR1上有适度提高,而所有其他效应量微不足道或很小。总之,无论是以90%或100%速度进行的每周冲刺训练,还是有监督的冲刺训练,都没有提高青少年足球运动员特定于足球项目的身体表现。