Suppr超能文献

红斑毛细血管扩张型酒渣鼻与毛细血管扩张性光老化的临床、组织学和分子分析差异。

Clinical, Histologic, and Molecular Analysis of Differences Between Erythematotelangiectatic Rosacea and Telangiectatic Photoaging.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.

Department of Dermatology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor2Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.

出版信息

JAMA Dermatol. 2015 Aug;151(8):825-36. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.4728.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Facial erythema and telangiectasia are commonly associated with the erythematotelangiectatic subtype of rosacea (ETR). It is important for clinicians to recognize that these findings can also be associated with a subtype of photoaging, which we term telangiectatic photoaging (TP).

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate that ETR and TP are distinct dermatologic disorders.

DESIGN

A case-control observational study comparing clinical, histologic, and gene expression features of 26 participants with ETR, 20 with TP, and 11 age- and sex-matched controls in the Program for Clinical Research in Dermatology at University of Michigan.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Findings of clinical history and examination, light and electron microscopy, immunohistochemical analyses, and real-time quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction gene expression.

RESULTS

Transient erythema was greater in the ETR group (38% graded moderate to severe) than in the TP (0%; P < .001) and control groups (0%; P = .002). Nontransient erythema was also greater in the ETR group (50% graded moderate to severe) than in the TP (25%; P = .03) and control groups (0%; P < .001). Participants with ETR tended to have erythema and telangiectasia primarily on the central face (79%), whereas those with TP tended to have more lateral involvement (57%; P < .001). Those with ETR had significantly less clinical evidence of photodamage (0% graded 6-8 on a photonumeric scale) than those with TP (40% graded 6-8; P = .01). Histologically, there was less evidence of photodamage in ETR than in TP, which had wispy collagen and solar elastosis surrounding blood vessels. Immunohistologic analysis demonstrated greater geometric mean immunostained area by mast cell tryptase staining in ETR samples (0.018%) than in TP (0.004%; P = .01) or control samples (0.001%; P < .001) but no increase in mast cell number, indicative of greater mast cell degranulation. Gene expression of matrix metalloproteinase-3 was 4-fold greater in ETR samples than in TP samples (P = .004) and 5-fold higher than in control samples (P = .004). Gene expression of the neuropeptides calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP-α) and substance P was significantly increased in ETR compared with TP (9-fold [P < .001] and 5-fold [P = .002], respectively) and control samples (10-fold [P < .001] and 28-fold [P < .001], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Telangiectatic photoaging is characterized by less transient and nontransient erythema, a more lateral distribution of erythema and telangiectasia, less neurogenic mast cell activation, and less MMP-mediated matrix remodeling than ETR. These data demonstrate that TP is a distinct clinical entity from ETR that can be distinguished on the basis of clinical, histologic, and gene expression findings.

摘要

重要性

面部红斑和毛细血管扩张通常与酒渣鼻的红斑毛细血管扩张型(ETR)相关。临床医生需要认识到,这些表现也可能与一种光老化亚型有关,我们将其称为毛细血管扩张性光老化(TP)。

目的

证明 ETR 和 TP 是两种不同的皮肤科疾病。

设计

在密歇根大学临床研究计划中,对 26 名 ETR 患者、20 名 TP 患者和 11 名年龄和性别匹配的对照者进行了病例对照观察性研究,比较了他们的临床、组织学和基因表达特征。

主要结局和措施

发现病史和检查、光镜和电镜、免疫组织化学分析以及实时定量逆转录聚合酶链反应基因表达的结果。

结果

ETR 组的一过性红斑(38%为中度至重度)比 TP 组(0%;P < .001)和对照组(0%;P = .002)更明显。ETR 组的非一过性红斑(50%为中度至重度)也比 TP 组(25%;P = .03)和对照组(0%;P < .001)更明显。ETR 患者的红斑和毛细血管扩张倾向于主要发生在中央面部(79%),而 TP 患者则倾向于更外侧受累(57%;P < .001)。与 TP 患者(40%为 6-8 分)相比,ETR 患者的红斑和毛细血管扩张更不易发生光损伤(0%为 6-8 分;P = .01)。组织学上,ETR 组的光损伤证据比 TP 组少,TP 组有丝状胶原和围绕血管的太阳弹性纤维。免疫组织化学分析显示,ETR 样本中肥大细胞胰蛋白酶染色的几何平均免疫染色面积(0.018%)明显大于 TP 样本(0.004%;P = .01)或对照样本(0.001%;P < .001),但肥大细胞数量没有增加,表明肥大细胞脱颗粒增加。ETR 样本中基质金属蛋白酶-3 的基因表达比 TP 样本高 4 倍(P = .004),比对照样本高 5 倍(P = .004)。ETR 样本中降钙素基因相关肽(CGRP-α)和 P 物质的神经肽基因表达明显高于 TP 样本(9 倍[P < .001]和 5 倍[P = .002])和对照样本(10 倍[P < .001]和 28 倍[P < .001])。

结论和相关性

毛细血管扩张性光老化的特点是一过性和非一过性红斑较少,红斑和毛细血管扩张的外侧分布较多,神经源性肥大细胞激活较少,MMP 介导的基质重塑较少,与 ETR 不同。这些数据表明,TP 是一种与 ETR 不同的临床实体,可基于临床、组织学和基因表达结果进行区分。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验