Brenowitz Eliot A, Zakon Harold H
Departments of Psychology and Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Departments of Neuroscience and Integrative Biology, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
Trends Neurosci. 2015 May;38(5):273-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2015.02.008. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
Neuroscience has historically exploited a wide diversity of animal taxa. Recently, however, research has focused increasingly on a few model species. This trend has accelerated with the genetic revolution, as genomic sequences and genetic tools became available for a few species, which formed a bottleneck. This coalescence on a small set of model species comes with several costs that are often not considered, especially in the current drive to use mice explicitly as models for human diseases. Comparative studies of strategically chosen non-model species can complement model species research and yield more rigorous studies. As genetic sequences and tools become available for many more species, we are poised to emerge from the bottleneck and once again exploit the rich biological diversity offered by comparative studies.
从历史上看,神经科学利用了种类繁多的动物类群。然而,最近的研究越来越集中在少数几种模式生物上。随着基因革命的到来,这种趋势加速了,因为少数物种有了基因组序列和基因工具,这形成了一个瓶颈。聚焦于一小部分模式生物带来了一些常常未被考虑到的代价,尤其是在当前明确将小鼠用作人类疾病模型的热潮中。对经过策略性选择的非模式生物进行比较研究,可以补充模式生物的研究,并产生更严谨的研究成果。随着越来越多物种有了基因序列和工具,我们有望突破瓶颈,再次利用比较研究提供的丰富生物多样性。