Drozdovitch Vladimir, Brill Aaron B, Callahan Ronald J, Clanton Jeffrey A, DePietro Allegra, Goldsmith Stanley J, Greenspan Bennett S, Gross Milton D, Hays Marguerite T, Moore Stephen C, Ponto James A, Shreeve Walton W, Melo Dunstana R, Linet Martha S, Simon Steven L
*Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, DHHS, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892; †Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; ‡Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; §Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; **New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY; ††University of Missouri, Columbia Nuclear Medicine program, Columbia, MO; ‡‡Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Health System, Ann Arbor, MI; §§Department of Veterans Affairs Health System, Palo Alto, CA; ***Retired; †††Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; ‡‡‡University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA; §§§Veterans Affairs Northport, Long Island, NY; ****Center for Countermeasures against Radiation, Lovelace Respiratory Research Institute, Albuquerque, NM.
Health Phys. 2015 May;108(5):520-37. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000261.
To reconstruct reliable nuclear medicine-related occupational radiation doses or doses received as patients from radiopharmaceuticals over the last five decades, the authors assessed which radiopharmaceuticals were used in different time periods, their relative frequency of use, and typical values of the administered activity. This paper presents data on the changing patterns of clinical use of radiopharmaceuticals and documents the range of activity administered to adult patients undergoing diagnostic nuclear medicine procedures in the U.S. between 1960 and 2010. Data are presented for 15 diagnostic imaging procedures that include thyroid scan and thyroid uptake; brain scan; brain blood flow; lung perfusion and ventilation; bone, liver, hepatobiliary, bone marrow, pancreas, and kidney scans; cardiac imaging procedures; tumor localization studies; localization of gastrointestinal bleeding; and non-imaging studies of blood volume and iron metabolism. Data on the relative use of radiopharmaceuticals were collected using key informant interviews and comprehensive literature reviews of typical administered activities of these diagnostic nuclear medicine studies. Responses of key informants on relative use of radiopharmaceuticals are in agreement with published literature. Results of this study will be used for retrospective reconstruction of occupational and personal medical radiation doses from diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals to members of the U.S. radiologic technologists' cohort and in reconstructing radiation doses from occupational or patient radiation exposures to other U.S. workers or patient populations.
为了重建过去五十年来可靠的核医学相关职业辐射剂量或患者接受放射性药物的剂量,作者评估了不同时间段使用了哪些放射性药物、它们的相对使用频率以及给药活度的典型值。本文介绍了放射性药物临床使用模式的变化数据,并记录了1960年至2010年期间美国接受诊断性核医学检查的成年患者的给药活度范围。给出了15种诊断成像程序的数据,包括甲状腺扫描和甲状腺摄取;脑扫描;脑血流;肺灌注和通气;骨、肝、肝胆、骨髓、胰腺和肾扫描;心脏成像程序;肿瘤定位研究;胃肠道出血定位;以及血容量和铁代谢的非成像研究。使用关键知情者访谈和对这些诊断性核医学研究典型给药活度的综合文献综述收集了放射性药物相对使用情况的数据。关键知情者对放射性药物相对使用情况的回答与已发表的文献一致。本研究结果将用于回顾性重建美国放射技师队列成员因诊断性放射性药物所致的职业和个人医疗辐射剂量,以及重建其他美国工人或患者群体因职业或患者辐射暴露所致的辐射剂量。