Sijtsma Klaas
Department of Methodology and Statistics, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, PO Box 90153, 5000 LE , Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Psychometrika. 2016 Mar;81(1):1-15. doi: 10.1007/s11336-015-9446-0.
Recent fraud cases in psychological and medical research have emphasized the need to pay attention to Questionable Research Practices (QRPs). Deliberate or not, QRPs usually have a deteriorating effect on the quality and the credibility of research results. QRPs must be revealed but prevention of QRPs is more important than detection. I suggest two policy measures that I expect to be effective in improving the quality of psychological research. First, the research data and the research materials should be made publicly available so as to allow verification. Second, researchers should more readily consider consulting a methodologist or a statistician. These two measures are simple but run against common practice to keep data to oneself and overestimate one's methodological and statistical skills, thus allowing secrecy and errors to enter research practice.
近期心理学和医学研究中的欺诈案例凸显了关注可疑研究行为(QRPs)的必要性。无论是否出于故意,可疑研究行为通常都会对研究结果的质量和可信度产生不利影响。必须揭露可疑研究行为,但预防可疑研究行为比发现更为重要。我提出两项政策措施,期望能有效提高心理学研究的质量。首先,研究数据和研究材料应公开,以便进行核查。其次,研究人员应更乐于考虑咨询方法学家或统计学家。这两项措施虽简单,却与将数据据为己有、高估自身方法和统计技能的常见做法相悖,从而使研究实践中出现保密和错误问题。