Suppr超能文献

视黄酸和长时程增强通过不同的SNARE依赖机制募集突触后AMPA受体。

Retinoic Acid and LTP Recruit Postsynaptic AMPA Receptors Using Distinct SNARE-Dependent Mechanisms.

作者信息

Arendt Kristin L, Zhang Yingsha, Jurado Sandra, Malenka Robert C, Südhof Thomas C, Chen Lu

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 265 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-5453, USA.

Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 265 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-5453, USA.

出版信息

Neuron. 2015 Apr 22;86(2):442-56. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.03.009. Epub 2015 Apr 2.

Abstract

Retinoic acid (RA)-dependent homeostatic plasticity and NMDA receptor-dependent long-term potentiation (LTP), a form of Hebbian plasticity, both enhance synaptic strength by increasing the abundance of postsynaptic AMPA receptors (AMPARs). However, it is unclear whether the molecular mechanisms mediating AMPAR trafficking during homeostatic and Hebbian plasticity differ, and it is unknown how RA signaling impacts Hebbian plasticity. Here, we show that RA increases postsynaptic AMPAR abundance using an activity-dependent mechanism that requires a unique SNARE (soluble NSF-attachment protein receptor)-dependent fusion machinery different from that mediating LTP. Specifically, RA-induced AMPAR trafficking did not involve complexin, which activates SNARE complexes containing syntaxin-1 or -3, but not complexes containing syntaxin-4, whereas LTP required complexin. Moreover, RA-induced AMPAR trafficking utilized the Q-SNARE syntaxin-4, whereas LTP utilized syntaxin-3; both additionally required the Q-SNARE SNAP-47 and the R-SNARE synatobrevin-2. Finally, acute RA treatment blocked subsequent LTP expression, probably by increasing AMPAR trafficking. Thus, RA-induced homeostatic plasticity involves a novel, activity-dependent postsynaptic AMPAR-trafficking pathway mediated by a unique SNARE-dependent fusion machinery.

摘要

视黄酸(RA)依赖性稳态可塑性和NMDA受体依赖性长时程增强(LTP),一种赫布可塑性形式,均通过增加突触后AMPA受体(AMPARs)的丰度来增强突触强度。然而,尚不清楚在稳态可塑性和赫布可塑性过程中介导AMPAR转运的分子机制是否不同,并且RA信号如何影响赫布可塑性也不清楚。在这里,我们表明RA通过一种活性依赖性机制增加突触后AMPAR丰度,该机制需要一种独特的SNARE(可溶性NSF附着蛋白受体)依赖性融合机制,不同于介导LTP的机制。具体而言,RA诱导的AMPAR转运不涉及结合蛋白,结合蛋白可激活包含 syntaxin-1或-3的SNARE复合体,但不激活包含syntaxin-4的复合体,而LTP需要结合蛋白。此外,RA诱导的AMPAR转运利用Q-SNARE syntaxin-4,而LTP利用syntaxin-3;两者还都需要Q-SNARE SNAP-47和R-SNARE突触囊泡蛋白-2。最后,急性RA处理可能通过增加AMPAR转运来阻断随后的LTP表达。因此,RA诱导的稳态可塑性涉及一种由独特的SNARE依赖性融合机制介导的新型活性依赖性突触后AMPAR转运途径。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
Syntaxin 3B: A SNARE Protein Required for Vision.Syntaxin 3B:一种视觉所需的 SNARE 蛋白。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Oct 3;25(19):10665. doi: 10.3390/ijms251910665.
3
Ketamine induced synaptic plasticity operates independently of long-term potentiation.氯胺酮诱导的突触可塑性独立于长时程增强作用。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2024 Oct;49(11):1758-1766. doi: 10.1038/s41386-024-01895-2. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
7
Postsynaptic synucleins mediate endocannabinoid signaling.突触后突触核蛋白介导内源性大麻素信号传递。
Nat Neurosci. 2023 Jun;26(6):997-1007. doi: 10.1038/s41593-023-01345-0. Epub 2023 May 29.
9
Rapid homeostatic plasticity and neuropsychiatric therapeutics.快速体内平衡调节可塑性与神经精神疾病治疗。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2023 Jan;48(1):54-60. doi: 10.1038/s41386-022-01411-4. Epub 2022 Aug 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Homeostatic control of presynaptic neurotransmitter release.突触前神经递质释放的稳态控制。
Annu Rev Physiol. 2015;77:251-70. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021014-071740. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
6
AMPARs and synaptic plasticity: the last 25 years.AMPA 受体与突触可塑性:过去 25 年。
Neuron. 2013 Oct 30;80(3):704-17. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.025.
8

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验