• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Retinoic Acid and LTP Recruit Postsynaptic AMPA Receptors Using Distinct SNARE-Dependent Mechanisms.视黄酸和长时程增强通过不同的SNARE依赖机制募集突触后AMPA受体。
Neuron. 2015 Apr 22;86(2):442-56. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.03.009. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
2
LTP requires a unique postsynaptic SNARE fusion machinery.LTP 需要独特的突触后 SNARE 融合机制。
Neuron. 2013 Feb 6;77(3):542-58. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.11.029.
3
Role of syntaxin 4 in activity-dependent exocytosis and synaptic plasticity in hippocampal neurons.突触融合蛋白 4 在海马神经元活动依赖性胞吐作用和突触可塑性中的作用。
Sci Signal. 2010 Oct 19;3(144):jc7. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.3144jc7.
4
Postsynaptic complexin controls AMPA receptor exocytosis during LTP.突触后复合蛋白在 LTP 期间控制 AMPA 受体胞吐。
Neuron. 2012 Jan 26;73(2):260-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.11.020.
5
Control of Homeostatic Synaptic Plasticity by AKAP-Anchored Kinase and Phosphatase Regulation of Ca-Permeable AMPA Receptors.钙通透性 AMPA 受体的 AKAP 锚定激酶和磷酸酶调节对稳态突触可塑性的控制。
J Neurosci. 2018 Mar 14;38(11):2863-2876. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2362-17.2018. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
6
Synaptic retinoic acid receptor signaling mediates mTOR-dependent metaplasticity that controls hippocampal learning.突触视黄酸受体信号转导介导 mTOR 依赖性的形质可塑性,从而控制海马体学习。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 2;116(14):7113-7122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1820690116. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
7
Postsynaptic density 95 controls AMPA receptor incorporation during long-term potentiation and experience-driven synaptic plasticity.突触后致密蛋白95在长时程增强和经验驱动的突触可塑性过程中控制AMPA受体的整合。
J Neurosci. 2004 Jan 28;24(4):916-27. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4733-03.2004.
8
Mechanism underlying hippocampal long-term potentiation and depression based on competition between endocytosis and exocytosis of AMPA receptors.基于 AMPA 受体内吞和胞吐竞争的海马长时程增强和长时程抑制的机制。
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 7;10(1):14711. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71528-3.
9
Crucial Role of Postsynaptic Syntaxin 4 in Mediating Basal Neurotransmission and Synaptic Plasticity in Hippocampal CA1 Neurons.突触后结构域蛋白 4 在调节海马 CA1 神经元基础神经传递和突触可塑性中的关键作用。
Cell Rep. 2018 Jun 5;23(10):2955-2966. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.05.026.
10
Hippocampal LTP and contextual learning require surface diffusion of AMPA receptors.海马体的长时程增强效应和情境学习需要AMPA受体的表面扩散。
Nature. 2017 Sep 21;549(7672):384-388. doi: 10.1038/nature23658. Epub 2017 Sep 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Cingulate retinoic acid signaling regulates neuropathic pain and comorbid anxiodepression via extracellular matrix homeostasis.扣带回视黄酸信号通过细胞外基质稳态调节神经性疼痛和共病性焦虑抑郁。
J Clin Invest. 2025 Jul 1;135(17). doi: 10.1172/JCI190539. eCollection 2025 Sep 2.
2
Syntaxin 3B: A SNARE Protein Required for Vision.Syntaxin 3B:一种视觉所需的 SNARE 蛋白。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Oct 3;25(19):10665. doi: 10.3390/ijms251910665.
3
Ketamine induced synaptic plasticity operates independently of long-term potentiation.氯胺酮诱导的突触可塑性独立于长时程增强作用。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2024 Oct;49(11):1758-1766. doi: 10.1038/s41386-024-01895-2. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
4
Synaptic homeostasis transiently leverages Hebbian mechanisms for a multiphasic response to inactivity.突触稳态暂时利用赫布学习机制对失活产生多相反应。
Cell Rep. 2024 Apr 23;43(4):113839. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113839. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
5
Hippocampal place code plasticity in CA1 requires postsynaptic membrane fusion.海马体CA1区位置编码可塑性需要突触后膜融合。
bioRxiv. 2023 Nov 21:2023.11.20.567978. doi: 10.1101/2023.11.20.567978.
6
Insufficient support for retinoic acid receptor control of synaptic plasticity through a non-genomic mechanism.缺乏对维甲酸受体通过非基因组机制控制突触可塑性的支持。
Front Neuroendocrinol. 2023 Oct;71:101099. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2023.101099. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
7
Postsynaptic synucleins mediate endocannabinoid signaling.突触后突触核蛋白介导内源性大麻素信号传递。
Nat Neurosci. 2023 Jun;26(6):997-1007. doi: 10.1038/s41593-023-01345-0. Epub 2023 May 29.
8
Retinoic acid-gated BDNF synthesis in neuronal dendrites drives presynaptic homeostatic plasticity.视黄酸门控 BDNF 在神经元树突中的合成驱动突触前稳态可塑性。
Elife. 2022 Dec 14;11:e79863. doi: 10.7554/eLife.79863.
9
Rapid homeostatic plasticity and neuropsychiatric therapeutics.快速体内平衡调节可塑性与神经精神疾病治疗。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2023 Jan;48(1):54-60. doi: 10.1038/s41386-022-01411-4. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
10
A synaptomic analysis reveals dopamine hub synapses in the mouse striatum.一项突触组学分析揭示了小鼠纹状体中的多巴胺枢纽突触。
Nat Commun. 2022 Jun 3;13(1):3102. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30776-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Homeostatic control of presynaptic neurotransmitter release.突触前神经递质释放的稳态控制。
Annu Rev Physiol. 2015;77:251-70. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021014-071740. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
2
Modeling the dynamic interaction of Hebbian and homeostatic plasticity.模拟赫布可塑性和稳态可塑性的动态相互作用。
Neuron. 2014 Oct 22;84(2):497-510. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.09.036.
3
Cerebellar long-term potentiation: cellular mechanisms and role in learning.小脑长时程增强:细胞机制及其在学习中的作用。
Int Rev Neurobiol. 2014;117:39-51. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-420247-4.00003-8.
4
Dendritic spines: the locus of structural and functional plasticity.树突棘:结构和功能可塑性的位置。
Physiol Rev. 2014 Jan;94(1):141-88. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00012.2013.
5
Incorporation of inwardly rectifying AMPA receptors at silent synapses during hippocampal long-term potentiation.在海马体长时程增强过程中,内向整流型 AMPA 受体在沉默突触中的嵌入。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Dec 2;369(1633):20130156. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0156. Print 2014 Jan 5.
6
AMPARs and synaptic plasticity: the last 25 years.AMPA 受体与突触可塑性:过去 25 年。
Neuron. 2013 Oct 30;80(3):704-17. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.025.
7
Neurotransmitter release: the last millisecond in the life of a synaptic vesicle.神经递质释放:突触囊泡生命的最后一刹那。
Neuron. 2013 Oct 30;80(3):675-90. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.022.
8
Rapid suppression of inhibitory synaptic transmission by retinoic acid.视黄酸快速抑制抑制性突触传递。
J Neurosci. 2013 Jul 10;33(28):11440-50. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1710-13.2013.
9
LTP requires a unique postsynaptic SNARE fusion machinery.LTP 需要独特的突触后 SNARE 融合机制。
Neuron. 2013 Feb 6;77(3):542-58. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.11.029.
10
Chronic inactivation of a neural circuit enhances LTP by inducing silent synapse formation.慢性抑制神经回路会通过诱导沉默突触形成来增强 LTP。
J Neurosci. 2013 Jan 30;33(5):2087-96. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3880-12.2013.

视黄酸和长时程增强通过不同的SNARE依赖机制募集突触后AMPA受体。

Retinoic Acid and LTP Recruit Postsynaptic AMPA Receptors Using Distinct SNARE-Dependent Mechanisms.

作者信息

Arendt Kristin L, Zhang Yingsha, Jurado Sandra, Malenka Robert C, Südhof Thomas C, Chen Lu

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 265 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-5453, USA.

Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 265 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-5453, USA.

出版信息

Neuron. 2015 Apr 22;86(2):442-56. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.03.009. Epub 2015 Apr 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.03.009
PMID:25843403
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4578641/
Abstract

Retinoic acid (RA)-dependent homeostatic plasticity and NMDA receptor-dependent long-term potentiation (LTP), a form of Hebbian plasticity, both enhance synaptic strength by increasing the abundance of postsynaptic AMPA receptors (AMPARs). However, it is unclear whether the molecular mechanisms mediating AMPAR trafficking during homeostatic and Hebbian plasticity differ, and it is unknown how RA signaling impacts Hebbian plasticity. Here, we show that RA increases postsynaptic AMPAR abundance using an activity-dependent mechanism that requires a unique SNARE (soluble NSF-attachment protein receptor)-dependent fusion machinery different from that mediating LTP. Specifically, RA-induced AMPAR trafficking did not involve complexin, which activates SNARE complexes containing syntaxin-1 or -3, but not complexes containing syntaxin-4, whereas LTP required complexin. Moreover, RA-induced AMPAR trafficking utilized the Q-SNARE syntaxin-4, whereas LTP utilized syntaxin-3; both additionally required the Q-SNARE SNAP-47 and the R-SNARE synatobrevin-2. Finally, acute RA treatment blocked subsequent LTP expression, probably by increasing AMPAR trafficking. Thus, RA-induced homeostatic plasticity involves a novel, activity-dependent postsynaptic AMPAR-trafficking pathway mediated by a unique SNARE-dependent fusion machinery.

摘要

视黄酸(RA)依赖性稳态可塑性和NMDA受体依赖性长时程增强(LTP),一种赫布可塑性形式,均通过增加突触后AMPA受体(AMPARs)的丰度来增强突触强度。然而,尚不清楚在稳态可塑性和赫布可塑性过程中介导AMPAR转运的分子机制是否不同,并且RA信号如何影响赫布可塑性也不清楚。在这里,我们表明RA通过一种活性依赖性机制增加突触后AMPAR丰度,该机制需要一种独特的SNARE(可溶性NSF附着蛋白受体)依赖性融合机制,不同于介导LTP的机制。具体而言,RA诱导的AMPAR转运不涉及结合蛋白,结合蛋白可激活包含 syntaxin-1或-3的SNARE复合体,但不激活包含syntaxin-4的复合体,而LTP需要结合蛋白。此外,RA诱导的AMPAR转运利用Q-SNARE syntaxin-4,而LTP利用syntaxin-3;两者还都需要Q-SNARE SNAP-47和R-SNARE突触囊泡蛋白-2。最后,急性RA处理可能通过增加AMPAR转运来阻断随后的LTP表达。因此,RA诱导的稳态可塑性涉及一种由独特的SNARE依赖性融合机制介导的新型活性依赖性突触后AMPAR转运途径。