Lakusta Laura, Carey Susan
Montclair State University.
Harvard University.
Lang Learn Dev. 2015 Apr;11(2):152-157. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2014.896168.
Across languages and event types (agentive and non-agentive motion, transfer, change of state, attach/detach), goal paths are privileged over source paths in the linguistic encoding of events. Furthermore, some linguistic analyses suggest that goal paths are more central than source paths in the semantic and syntactic structure of motion verbs. However, in the non-linguistic memory of children and adults, a goal bias shows up only for events involving intentional, goal-directed, action. Three experiments explored infants' non-linguistic representations of goals and sources in motion events. The findings revealed that 12-month-old infants privilege goals over sources only when the event involves action of an agent. Thus, unlike language (but similar to the memory of children and adults), an endpoint bias in infant thought may be restricted to events involving goal-directed motion by an agent. These results raise the question of how children later learn to collapse over conceptual domains for purposes of coding paths in language.
在各种语言和事件类型(施事性和非施事性运动、转移、状态变化、附着/分离)中,在事件的语言编码里,目标路径比源路径更受重视。此外,一些语言分析表明,在运动动词的语义和句法结构中,目标路径比源路径更核心。然而,在儿童和成人的非语言记忆中,目标偏向仅在涉及有意的、目标导向的动作的事件中出现。三项实验探究了婴儿在运动事件中对目标和源的非语言表征。研究结果显示,只有当事件涉及施事的动作时,12个月大的婴儿才会更重视目标而非源。因此,与语言不同(但与儿童和成人的记忆相似),婴儿思维中的终点偏向可能仅限于涉及施事的目标导向运动的事件。这些结果提出了一个问题,即儿童后来如何为了在语言中编码路径而学会跨越概念领域进行整合。