Campos Marin A, Lacroix D
INSIGNEO Institute for in silico Medicine, Department of Mechanical Engineering , University of Sheffield , Sheffield S1 3JD , UK.
Interface Focus. 2015 Apr 6;5(2):20140097. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2014.0097.
Rapid prototyping techniques have been widely used in tissue engineering to fabricate scaffolds with controlled architecture. Despite the ability of these techniques to fabricate regular structures, the consistency with which these regular structures are produced throughout the scaffold and from one scaffold to another needs to be quantified. Small variations at the pore level can affect the local mechanical stimuli sensed by the cells thereby affecting the final tissue properties. Most studies assume rapid prototyping scaffolds as regular structures without quantifying the local mechanical stimuli at the cell level. In this study, a computational method using a micro-computed tomography-based scaffold geometry was developed to characterize the mechanical stimuli within a real scaffold at the pore level. Five samples from a commercial polycaprolactone scaffold were analysed and computational fluid dynamics analyses were created to compare local velocity and shear stress values at the same scaffold location. The five samples did not replicate the computer-aided design (CAD) scaffold and velocity and shear stress values were up to five times higher than the ones calculated in the CAD scaffold. In addition high variability among samples was found: at the same location velocity and shear stress values could be up to two times higher from sample to sample. This study shows that regular scaffolds need to be thoroughly analysed in order to quantify real cell mechanical stimuli so inspection methods should be included as part of the fabrication process.
快速成型技术已在组织工程中广泛应用,用于制造具有可控结构的支架。尽管这些技术能够制造规则结构,但整个支架内以及从一个支架到另一个支架产生这些规则结构的一致性仍需量化。孔隙水平的微小变化会影响细胞感知的局部机械刺激,从而影响最终的组织特性。大多数研究将快速成型支架视为规则结构,而未在细胞水平上量化局部机械刺激。在本研究中,开发了一种基于微计算机断层扫描的支架几何结构的计算方法,以在孔隙水平上表征真实支架内的机械刺激。分析了来自商业聚己内酯支架的五个样品,并进行了计算流体动力学分析,以比较同一支架位置处的局部速度和剪切应力值。这五个样品与计算机辅助设计(CAD)支架不一致,速度和剪切应力值比CAD支架中计算的值高出五倍。此外,还发现样品之间存在很大差异:在相同位置,不同样品的速度和剪切应力值可能相差两倍。这项研究表明,为了量化真实的细胞机械刺激,需要对规则支架进行全面分析,因此检查方法应作为制造过程的一部分。