Bei Bei, Ong Jason C, Rajaratnam Shantha M W, Manber Rachel
School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Biomedical and Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Australia.
Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Australia.
J Clin Sleep Med. 2015 Sep 15;11(9):1021-7. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.5018.
Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) has been shown to improve both sleep and depressive symptoms, but predictors of depression outcome following CBT-I have not been well examined. This study investigated how chronotype (i.e., morningness-eveningness trait) and changes in sleep efficiency (SE) were related to changes in depressive symptoms among recipients of CBT-I.
Included were 419 adult insomnia outpatients from a sleep disorders clinic (43.20% males, age mean ± standard deviation = 48.14 ± 14.02). All participants completed the Composite Scale of Morningness and attended at least 4 sessions of a 6-session group CBT-I. SE was extracted from sleep diary; depressive symptoms were assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) prior to (Baseline), and at the end (End) of intervention.
Multilevel structural equation modeling revealed that from Baseline to End, SE increased and BDI decreased significantly. Controlling for age, sex, BDI, and SE at Baseline, stronger evening chronotype and less improvement in SE significantly and uniquely predicted less reduction in BDI from Baseline to End. Chronotype did not predict improvement in SE.
In an insomnia outpatient sample, SE and depressive symptoms improved significantly after a CBT-I group intervention. All chronotypes benefited from sleep improvement, but those with greater eveningness and/or less sleep improvement experienced less reduction in depressive symptom severity. This suggests that evening preference and insomnia symptoms may have distinct relationships with mood, raising the possibility that the effect of CBT-I on depressive symptoms could be enhanced by assessing and addressing circadian factors.
失眠的认知行为疗法(CBT-I)已被证明可改善睡眠和抑郁症状,但CBT-I后抑郁结果的预测因素尚未得到充分研究。本研究调查了昼夜节律类型(即晨型-夜型特质)和睡眠效率(SE)的变化与CBT-I接受者抑郁症状变化之间的关系。
纳入了来自睡眠障碍诊所的419名成年失眠门诊患者(男性占43.20%,年龄均值±标准差=48.14±14.02)。所有参与者均完成了晨型综合量表,并参加了一个6节的团体CBT-I课程中的至少4节。SE从睡眠日记中提取;在干预前(基线)和结束时使用贝克抑郁量表(BDI)评估抑郁症状。
多层次结构方程模型显示,从基线到结束,SE增加,BDI显著下降。在控制年龄、性别、基线时的BDI和SE后,更强的夜型节律和SE改善较少显著且独特地预测了从基线到结束时BDI降低较少。昼夜节律类型不能预测SE的改善。
在失眠门诊样本中,CBT-I团体干预后SE和抑郁症状显著改善。所有昼夜节律类型都从睡眠改善中受益,但夜型倾向更强和/或睡眠改善较少的人抑郁症状严重程度降低较少。这表明夜型偏好和失眠症状可能与情绪有不同的关系,这增加了通过评估和解决昼夜节律因素来增强CBT-I对抑郁症状影响的可能性。