Hoffer L John, Robitaille Line, Zakarian Robert, Melnychuk David, Kavan Petr, Agulnik Jason, Cohen Victor, Small David, Miller Wilson H
Department of Medicine, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada.
Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Montreal, Canada.
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 7;10(4):e0120228. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120228. eCollection 2015.
Biological and some clinical evidence suggest that high-dose intravenous vitamin C (IVC) could increase the effectiveness of cancer chemotherapy. IVC is widely used by integrative and complementary cancer therapists, but rigorous data are lacking as to its safety and which cancers and chemotherapy regimens would be the most promising to investigate in detail.
We carried out a phase I-II safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic and efficacy trial of IVC combined with chemotherapy in patients whose treating oncologist judged that standard-of-care or off-label chemotherapy offered less than a 33% likelihood of a meaningful response. We documented adverse events and toxicity associated with IVC infusions, determined pre- and post-chemotherapy vitamin C and oxalic acid pharmacokinetic profiles, and monitored objective clinical responses, mood and quality of life. Fourteen patients were enrolled. IVC was safe and generally well tolerated, although some patients experienced transient adverse events during or after IVC infusions. The pre- and post-chemotherapy pharmacokinetic profiles suggested that tissue uptake of vitamin C increases after chemotherapy, with no increase in urinary oxalic acid excretion. Three patients with different types of cancer experienced unexpected transient stable disease, increased energy and functional improvement.
Despite IVC's biological and clinical plausibility, career cancer investigators currently ignore it while integrative cancer therapists use it widely but without reporting the kind of clinical data that is normally gathered in cancer drug development. The present study neither proves nor disproves IVC's value in cancer therapy, but it provides practical information, and indicates a feasible way to evaluate this plausible but unproven therapy in an academic environment that is currently uninterested in it. If carried out in sufficient numbers, simple studies like this one could identify specific clusters of cancer type, chemotherapy regimen and IVC in which exceptional responses occur frequently enough to justify appropriately focused clinical trials.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01050621.
生物学及一些临床证据表明,高剂量静脉注射维生素C(IVC)可能会提高癌症化疗的疗效。综合及辅助癌症治疗师广泛使用IVC,但关于其安全性以及哪些癌症和化疗方案最值得详细研究,目前仍缺乏严谨的数据。
我们对IVC联合化疗进行了一项I-II期安全性、耐受性、药代动力学及疗效试验,受试患者的主治肿瘤学家认为,标准治疗或非标准化疗产生有意义反应的可能性低于33%。我们记录了与IVC输注相关的不良事件和毒性,测定了化疗前后维生素C和草酸的药代动力学特征,并监测了客观临床反应、情绪和生活质量。共招募了14名患者。IVC是安全的,且总体耐受性良好,不过一些患者在IVC输注期间或之后出现了短暂的不良事件。化疗前后的药代动力学特征表明,化疗后维生素C的组织摄取增加,而尿草酸排泄并未增加。三名患有不同类型癌症的患者经历了意外的短暂疾病稳定、精力增加和功能改善。
尽管IVC在生物学和临床上似乎有合理性,但专业癌症研究人员目前对其不予理会,而综合癌症治疗师却广泛使用它,但未报告通常在癌症药物研发中收集的那种临床数据。本研究既未证明也未反驳IVC在癌症治疗中的价值,但它提供了实用信息,并指出了在当前对此不感兴趣的学术环境中评估这种似乎合理但未经证实的疗法的可行方法。如果进行足够数量的此类简单研究,就可以确定癌症类型、化疗方案和IVC的特定组合,在这些组合中,异常反应频繁发生,足以证明进行适当聚焦的临床试验是合理的。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01050621。