Suppr超能文献

宫颈上皮内瘤变切除术后早产风险增加是否仅限于治疗后的首次分娩?

Is the increased risk of preterm birth following excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia restricted to the first birth post treatment?

作者信息

Castañon A, Landy R, Brocklehurst P, Evans H, Peebles D, Singh N, Walker P, Patnick J, Sasieni P

机构信息

Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Bart's & The London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Institute for Women's Health UCL, London, UK.

出版信息

BJOG. 2015 Aug;122(9):1191-9. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13398. Epub 2015 Apr 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore whether the increased risk of preterm birth following treatment for cervical disease is limited to the first birth following colposcopy.

DESIGN

Nested case-control study.

SETTING

Twelve NHS hospitals in England.

POPULATION

All nonmultiple births from women selected as cases or controls from a cohort of women with both colposcopy and a hospital birth. Cases had a preterm (20-36 weeks of gestation) birth. Controls had a term birth (38-42 weeks) and no preterm.

METHODS

Obstetric, colposcopy and pathology details were obtained.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Adjusted odds ratio of preterm birth in first and second or subsequent births following treatment for cervical disease.

RESULTS

A total of 2798 births (1021 preterm) from 2001 women were included in the analysis. The risk of preterm birth increased with increasing depth of treatment among first births post treatment [trend per category increase in depth, categories <10 mm, 10-14 mm, 15-19 mm, ≥20 mm: odds ratio (OR) 1.23, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.12-1.36, P < 0.001] and among second and subsequent births post treatment (trend OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.15-1.56, P < 0.001). No trend was observed among births before colposcopy (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.83-1.16, P = 0.855). The absolute risk of a preterm birth following deep treatments (≥15 mm) was 6.5% among births before colposcopy, 18.9% among first births and 17.2% among second and subsequent births post treatment. Risk of preterm birth (once depth was accounted for) did not differ when comparing first births post colposcopy with second and subsequent births post colposcopy (adjusted OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.89-1.49).

CONCLUSIONS

The increased risk of preterm birth following treatment for cervical disease is not restricted to the first birth post colposcopy; it remains for second and subsequent births. These results suggest that once a woman has a deep treatment she remains at higher risk of a preterm birth throughout her reproductive life.

摘要

目的

探讨宫颈疾病治疗后早产风险增加是否仅限于阴道镜检查后的首次分娩。

设计

巢式病例对照研究。

地点

英国的12家国民保健服务医院。

研究对象

从接受阴道镜检查并在医院分娩的女性队列中选取作为病例或对照的所有单胎分娩。病例为早产(妊娠20 - 36周)。对照为足月分娩(38 - 42周)且无早产史。

方法

获取产科、阴道镜检查及病理细节。

主要观察指标

宫颈疾病治疗后首次分娩及第二次或后续分娩时早产的校正比值比。

结果

分析纳入了2001名女性的2798例分娩(1021例早产)。治疗后首次分娩中,早产风险随治疗深度增加而升高[深度每增加一个类别,类别分别为<10mm、10 - 14mm、15 - 19mm及≥20mm:比值比(OR)1.23,95%置信区间(95%CI)1.12 - 1.36,P < 0.001],治疗后第二次及后续分娩中亦如此(趋势OR 1.34,95%CI 1.15 - 1.56,P < 0.001)。阴道镜检查前的分娩中未观察到这种趋势(OR 0.98,95%CI 0.83 - 1.16,P = 0.855)。深度治疗(≥15mm)后早产的绝对风险在阴道镜检查前的分娩中为6.5%,治疗后首次分娩中为18.9%,治疗后第二次及后续分娩中为17.2%。比较阴道镜检查后的首次分娩与第二次及后续分娩时,早产风险(一旦考虑深度因素)无差异(校正OR 1.15,95%CI 0.89 - 1.49)。

结论

宫颈疾病治疗后早产风险增加并不局限于阴道镜检查后的首次分娩;第二次及后续分娩时该风险依然存在。这些结果表明,一旦女性接受深度治疗,其在整个生殖期发生早产的风险仍较高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6eec/5008142/435266936e2b/BJO-122-1191-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验