Suppr超能文献

对患者而言什么重要?对精神障碍中药物相关结局偏好的系统评价。

What matters to patients? A systematic review of preferences for medication-associated outcomes in mental disorders.

作者信息

Eiring Øystein, Landmark Brynjar Fowels, Aas Endre, Salkeld Glenn, Nylenna Magne, Nytrøen Kari

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, Oslo, Norway.

Department of Quality and Patient Safety, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Brumunddal, Norway.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 8;5(4):e007848. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007848.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate patients' preferences for outcomes associated with psychoactive medications.

SETTING/DESIGN: Systematic review of stated preference studies. No settings restrictions were applied.

PARTICIPANTS/ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included studies containing quantitative data regarding the relative value adults with mental disorders place on treatment outcomes. Studies with high risk of bias were excluded.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

We restricted the scope of our review to preferences for outcomes, including the consequences from, attributes of, and health states associated with particular medications or medication classes, and process outcomes.

RESULTS

After reviewing 11 215 citations, 16 studies were included in the systematic review. These studies reported the stated preferences from patients with schizophrenia (n=9), depression (n=4), bipolar disorder (n=2) and attention deficit hyperactive disorder (n=1). The median sample size was 81. Side effects and symptom outcomes outnumbered functioning and process outcomes. Severe disease and hospitalisation were reported to be least desirable. Patients with schizophrenia tended to value disease states as higher and side effects as lower, compared to other stakeholder groups. In depression, the ability to cope with activities was found to be more important than a depressed mood, per se. Patient preferences could not consistently be predicted from demographic or disease variables. Only a limited number of potentially important outcomes had been investigated. Benefits to patients were not part of the purpose in 9 of the 16 studies, and in 10 studies patients were not involved when the outcomes to present were selected.

CONCLUSIONS

Insufficient evidence exists on the relative value patients with mental disorders place on medication-associated outcomes. To increase patient-centredness in decisions involving psychoactive drugs, further research-with outcomes elicited from patients, and for a larger number of conditions-should be undertaken.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO CRD42013005685.

摘要

目的

调查患者对精神活性药物相关治疗结果的偏好。

设置/设计:对陈述性偏好研究的系统评价。未施加设置限制。

参与者/纳入标准:我们纳入了包含关于患有精神障碍的成年人对治疗结果的相对重视程度的定量数据的研究。偏倚风险高的研究被排除。

主要和次要结局指标

我们将综述范围限制在对结果的偏好上,包括特定药物或药物类别所带来的后果、属性以及与之相关的健康状况,还有过程性结果。

结果

在查阅了11215篇文献后,16项研究被纳入系统评价。这些研究报告了来自精神分裂症患者(n = 9)、抑郁症患者(n = 4)、双相情感障碍患者(n = 2)和注意力缺陷多动障碍患者(n = 1)的陈述性偏好。样本量中位数为81。副作用和症状性结果的数量超过了功能性和过程性结果。据报告,严重疾病和住院是最不期望出现的。与其他利益相关者群体相比,精神分裂症患者倾向于更看重疾病状态而不太看重副作用。在抑郁症方面,发现应对活动的能力比抑郁情绪本身更重要。无法从人口统计学或疾病变量中一致地预测患者偏好。仅对有限数量的潜在重要结果进行了调查。16项研究中有9项的目的不包括对患者的益处,并且在10项研究中,在选择要呈现的结果时未让患者参与。

结论

关于患有精神障碍的患者对药物相关结果的相对重视程度,现有证据不足。为了在涉及精神活性药物的决策中提高以患者为中心的程度,应开展进一步的研究——从患者中引出结果,并针对更多病症。

试验注册号

PROSPERO CRD42013005685。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cda/4390680/ee3903e3acae/bmjopen2015007848f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验