Lotan Yair, Haddad Ahmed Q, Costa Daniel N, Pedrosa Ivan, Rofsky Neil M, Roehrborn Claus G
Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Urol Oncol. 2015 Jun;33(6):266.e9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.03.007. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
We compared cost of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) vs. repeat biopsy in detection of prostate cancer (PCa) in men with prior negative findings on biopsy.
A decision tree model compared the strategy of office-based transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUS) for men with prior negative findings on biopsy with a strategy of initial MP-MRI with TRUS performed only in cases of abnormal results on imaging. Study end points were cost, number of biopsies, and cancers detected. Cost was based on Medicare reimbursement. Cost of sepsis and minor complications were incorporated into analysis. Sensitivity analyses were performed by varying model assumptions.
The baseline model with 24% PCa found that the overall cost for 100 men was $90,400 and $87,700 for TRUS and MP-MRI arms, respectively. The MP-MRI arm resulted in 73 fewer biopsies per 100 men but detected 4 fewer cancers (16 vs. 20.4) than the TRUS arm did. A lower risk of PCa resulted in lower costs for the MP-MRI arm and a small difference in detected cancers. At lower cancer rates, MP-MRI is superior to TRUS over a wide range of sensitivity and specificity of MRI. A lower sensitivity of MP-MRI decreases the cost of the MP-MRI, as fewer biopsies are performed, but this also reduces the number of cancers detected.
The use of MP-MRI to select patients for repeat biopsy reduced the number of biopsies needed by 73% but resulted in a few cancers being missed at lower cost when compared with the TRUS arm. Further studies are required to determine whether cancers missed represent clinically significant tumors.
我们比较了多参数磁共振成像(MP-MRI)与重复活检在检测既往活检结果为阴性的男性前列腺癌(PCa)中的成本。
决策树模型将既往活检结果为阴性的男性基于办公室经直肠超声引导活检(TRUS)的策略与初始MP-MRI策略进行了比较,后者仅在成像结果异常时进行TRUS。研究终点为成本、活检次数和检测到的癌症数量。成本基于医疗保险报销情况。将败血症和轻微并发症的成本纳入分析。通过改变模型假设进行敏感性分析。
在PCa患病率为24%的基线模型中,发现100名男性中TRUS组和MP-MRI组的总成本分别为90400美元和87700美元。MP-MRI组每100名男性的活检次数减少73次,但检测到的癌症比TRUS组少4例(16例对20.4例)。较低的PCa风险导致MP-MRI组成本降低,且检测到的癌症差异较小。在较低的癌症发生率下,在MRI的广泛敏感性和特异性范围内,MP-MRI优于TRUS。MP-MRI较低的敏感性降低了MP-MRI的成本,因为活检次数减少,但这也减少了检测到的癌症数量。
使用MP-MRI选择患者进行重复活检可使所需活检次数减少73%,但与TRUS组相比,以较低成本导致少数癌症漏诊。需要进一步研究以确定漏诊的癌症是否代表具有临床意义的肿瘤。