MacKinnon Ralph James, Kennedy Chris, Doherty Catherine, Shepherd Michael, Cole Joanne, Stenfors-Hayes Terese
Department of Paediatric Anaesthesia, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Emergency & Urgent Care, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 13;5(4):e006386. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006386.
As part of a programme of research aiming to improve the outcomes of traumatically injured children, a multisource healthcare advocacy tool has been developed to allow trauma team members and hospital governance administrators to reflect and to act on complex trauma team-hospital systems interactions. We have termed this tool a Field Assessment Conditioning Tool (FACT). The FACT draws on quantitative data including clinical care points in addition to self-reflective qualitative data. The FACT is designed to provide feedback on this assessment data both horizontally across fellow potential team members and vertically to the hospital/organisation governance structure, enabling process gap identification and allowing an agenda of improvements to be realised. The aim of the study described in this paper is to explore the perceived fitness for purpose of the FACT to provide an opportunity for healthcare advocacy by healthcare professionals caring for traumatically injured children.
The FACT will be implemented and studied in three district hospitals, each around a major trauma centre in the UK, USA and New Zealand. Using a qualitative approach with standardised semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis we will explore the following question: Is the FACT fit for purpose in terms of providing a framework to evaluate, reflect and act on the individual hospital's own performance (trauma team-hospital interactions) in terms of readiness to receive traumatically injured children?
Ethics opinion was sought for each research host organisation participating and deemed not required. The results will be disseminated to participating sites, networks and published in high-impact journals.
作为旨在改善创伤儿童治疗效果的研究项目的一部分,已开发出一种多源医疗倡导工具,以使创伤团队成员和医院管理管理人员能够对复杂的创伤团队与医院系统互动进行反思并采取行动。我们将此工具称为现场评估调节工具(FACT)。FACT除了利用自我反思的定性数据外,还借鉴了包括临床护理要点在内的定量数据。FACT旨在就这些评估数据在潜在团队成员之间横向以及向医院/组织管理结构纵向提供反馈,从而能够识别流程差距并实现改进议程。本文所述研究的目的是探讨FACT在为照顾创伤儿童的医疗专业人员提供医疗倡导机会方面的适用性。
FACT将在英国、美国和新西兰的三个地区医院实施和研究,每个医院都围绕一个主要创伤中心。我们将采用定性方法,通过标准化的半结构化访谈和主题分析来探讨以下问题:就提供一个框架以评估、反思和应对各医院自身在接收创伤儿童准备情况方面的表现(创伤团队与医院互动)而言,FACT是否适用?
已就参与研究的每个主办组织征求伦理意见,认为无需伦理意见。研究结果将分发给参与站点、网络,并发表在高影响力期刊上。