• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亚急性挥鞭样损伤相关疾病患者脊柱功能分类的测量属性

Measurement Properties of the Spinal Function Sort in Patients with Sub-acute Whiplash-Associated Disorders.

作者信息

Trippolini M A, Dijkstra P U, Geertzen J H B, Reneman M F

机构信息

Department of Work Rehabilitation, Rehaklinik Bellikon, Suva Care, 5454, Bellikon, Switzerland,

出版信息

J Occup Rehabil. 2015 Sep;25(3):527-36. doi: 10.1007/s10926-014-9559-9.

DOI:10.1007/s10926-014-9559-9
PMID:25875331
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4540759/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To extensively analyze the measurement properties the Spinal Function Sort (SFS) in patients with sub-acute whiplash-associated disorders (WAD).

METHODS

Three-hundred-two patients with WAD were recruited from an outpatient work rehabilitation center. Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach's α. Construct validity was tested based on eight a priori hypotheses. Structural validity was measured with principal component analysis (PCA). Test-retest reliability and agreement was evaluated in a sub sample (n = 32) using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and limits of agreement (LoA). The predictive validity of SFS for future work status at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up was determined by area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristics. Non-return to work (N-RTW) was defined with two cut-off points: workcapacity <50 and <100 %.

RESULTS

N-RTW decreased from 50%, 1 month follow-up, to 14%, 12 months follow-up. Cronbach's α was 0.98, PCA revealed evidence for unidimensionality. ICC was 0.86, LoA was ±33 points. Seven out of eight hypotheses for construct validity were not rejected. AUC reduced with a longer follow-up from 0.71 for 1 month to 0.61 at 12 months, for cut-off point <50%. For cut-off point <100% these values were 0.71 and 0.59.

CONCLUSION

In patients with sub-acute WAD test-retest reliability, internal consistency, construct- and structural validity of the SFS were adequate. LoA were substantial. Sensitivity to accurately predict N-RTW was poor. The predictive validity of the SFS for N-RTW of patients with sub-acute WAD from an outpatient work rehabilitation setting was only sufficient for the short term (1 month).

摘要

目的

广泛分析亚急性挥鞭样损伤相关疾病(WAD)患者的脊柱功能分类(SFS)测量属性。

方法

从门诊工作康复中心招募了302例WAD患者。采用Cronbach's α评估内部一致性。基于八个先验假设检验结构效度。用主成分分析(PCA)测量结构效度。在一个子样本(n = 32)中使用组内相关系数(ICC)和一致性界限(LoA)评估重测信度和一致性。通过接受者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)确定SFS对1、3、6和12个月随访时未来工作状态的预测效度。非重返工作岗位(N-RTW)用两个临界点定义:工作能力<50%和<100%。

结果

N-RTW从随访1个月时的50%降至随访12个月时的14%。Cronbach's α为0.98,PCA显示单维度性证据。ICC为0.86,LoA为±33分。八个结构效度假设中的七个未被拒绝。对于临界点<50%,AUC随着随访时间延长从1个月时的0.71降至12个月时的0.61。对于临界点<100%,这些值分别为0.71和0.59。

结论

在亚急性WAD患者中,SFS的重测信度、内部一致性、结构和结构效度是足够的。LoA较大。准确预测N-RTW的敏感性较差。门诊工作康复环境中亚急性WAD患者SFS对N-RTW的预测效度仅在短期内(1个月)足够。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b434/4540759/6453137be7db/10926_2014_9559_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b434/4540759/0b3a75f612b9/10926_2014_9559_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b434/4540759/45c453575890/10926_2014_9559_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b434/4540759/6453137be7db/10926_2014_9559_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b434/4540759/0b3a75f612b9/10926_2014_9559_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b434/4540759/45c453575890/10926_2014_9559_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b434/4540759/6453137be7db/10926_2014_9559_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Measurement Properties of the Spinal Function Sort in Patients with Sub-acute Whiplash-Associated Disorders.亚急性挥鞭样损伤相关疾病患者脊柱功能分类的测量属性
J Occup Rehabil. 2015 Sep;25(3):527-36. doi: 10.1007/s10926-014-9559-9.
2
Measurement Properties of the Modified Spinal Function Sort (M-SFS): Is It Reliable and Valid in Workers with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain?改良脊柱功能分类(M-SFS)的测量性能:在患有慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的工人中是否可靠和有效?
J Occup Rehabil. 2018 Jun;28(2):322-331. doi: 10.1007/s10926-017-9717-y.
3
The Neck Pain Driving Index (NPDI) for chronic whiplash-associated disorders: development, reliability, and validity assessment.慢性挥鞭样损伤相关疾病的颈部疼痛驱动指数(NPDI):开发、可靠性和有效性评估。
Spine J. 2012 Oct;12(10):912-20.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.09.053. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
4
The Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire cross-cultural adaptation into Dutch and evaluation of its psychometric properties in a population with subacute and chronic whiplash associated disorders.《伯恩茅斯颈部问卷》的跨文化适应性在亚急性和慢性与挥鞭样损伤相关疾病人群中的心理测量学特性评估。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Nov 1;34(23):2551-61. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b318c4.
5
Validation of a new questionnaire to assess the impact of Whiplash Associated Disorders: The Whiplash Activity and participation List (WAL).一种用于评估挥鞭样损伤相关疾病影响的新问卷的验证:挥鞭样损伤活动与参与列表(WAL)。
Man Ther. 2015 Feb;20(1):84-9. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2014.07.008. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
6
Structural and construct validity of the Whiplash Disability Questionnaire in adults with acute whiplash-associated disorders.急性挥鞭样损伤相关疾病成人患者中挥鞭样损伤残疾问卷的结构效度和构建效度
Spine J. 2015 Nov 1;15(11):2369-77. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.07.006. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
7
Construct Validity of Functional Capacity Evaluation in Patients with Whiplash-Associated Disorders.挥鞭样损伤相关疾病患者功能能力评估的结构效度
J Occup Rehabil. 2015 Sep;25(3):481-92. doi: 10.1007/s10926-014-9555-0.
8
Sincerity of effort versus feigned movement control of the cervical spine in patients with whiplash-associated disorders and asymptomatic persons: a case-control study.挥鞭样损伤相关疾病患者与无症状者颈椎真实用力与假装运动控制的比较:一项病例对照研究。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2015;31(6):403-9. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2015.1024299.
9
The risk assessment score in acute whiplash injury predicts outcome and reflects biopsychosocial factors.急性颈挥鞭伤的风险评估评分可预测结局,并反映生物-心理-社会因素。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Dec 1;36(25 Suppl):S263-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823881d6.
10
The ProFitMap-neck--reliability and validity of a questionnaire for measuring symptoms and functional limitations in neck pain.ProFitMap-neck 问卷:一种测量颈部疼痛症状和功能障碍的问卷的信度和效度。
Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(13):1096-107. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.635747. Epub 2011 Dec 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Reproducibility of improvements in patient-reported functional ability following functional capacity evaluation.患者报告的功能能力在功能能力评估后改善的可重复性。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Mar 16;23(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05208-w.
2
Psychometric properties of acute stress disorder questionnaire for people exposed to Kerman earthquake.针对克尔曼地震受灾人群的急性应激障碍问卷的心理测量特性。
J Educ Health Promot. 2020 Jan 30;9:23. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_460_19. eCollection 2020.
3
The Back College for nurses - an evaluation of intermediate effects.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of a measure of perceived functional ability.感知功能能力测量表的制定。
J Occup Rehabil. 1993 Mar;3(1):15-30. doi: 10.1007/BF01076739.
2
Functional capacity evaluation: Rationale, procedure, utility of the kinesiophysical approach.功能能力评估:运动物理方法的原理、程序和效用。
J Occup Rehabil. 1992 Sep;2(3):157-68. doi: 10.1007/BF01077187.
3
The reliability and validity of a measure of perceived functional capacity for work in chronic back pain.慢性背痛患者工作感知功能能力测量的信度和效度。
护士进修学院——中期效果评估
J Occup Med Toxicol. 2019 Jun 20;14:19. doi: 10.1186/s12995-019-0239-8. eCollection 2019.
4
Impact of Functional Capacity Evaluation on Patient-Reported Functional Ability: An Exploratory Diagnostic Before-After Study.功能能力评估对患者报告的功能能力的影响:一项探索性诊断前后研究。
J Occup Rehabil. 2019 Dec;29(4):711-717. doi: 10.1007/s10926-019-09829-2.
5
Avoidance, pacing, or persistence in multidisciplinary functional rehabilitation for chronic musculoskeletal pain: An observational study with cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses.避免、调整节奏或坚持多学科功能康复治疗慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛:一项具有横断面和纵向分析的观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 4;13(9):e0203329. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203329. eCollection 2018.
6
Measurement Properties of the Modified Spinal Function Sort (M-SFS): Is It Reliable and Valid in Workers with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain?改良脊柱功能分类(M-SFS)的测量性能:在患有慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的工人中是否可靠和有效?
J Occup Rehabil. 2018 Jun;28(2):322-331. doi: 10.1007/s10926-017-9717-y.
7
Development of a Modified Version of the Spinal Function Sort (M-SFS): A Mixed Method Approach.改良版脊髓功能分类法(M-SFS)的开发:一种混合方法研究
J Occup Rehabil. 2016 Sep;26(3):253-63. doi: 10.1007/s10926-015-9611-4.
J Occup Rehabil. 1996 Sep;6(3):159-75. doi: 10.1007/BF02110753.
4
Reliability and safety of functional capacity evaluation in patients with whiplash associated disorders.颈背部挥鞭伤相关疾病患者功能能力评估的可靠性和安全性。
J Occup Rehabil. 2013 Sep;23(3):381-90. doi: 10.1007/s10926-012-9403-z.
5
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, internal consistency and validation of the Spinal Function Sort (SFS) for French- and German-speaking patients with back complaints.跨文化调适、信度、内部一致性及脊柱功能排序(SFS)在法德语言背景下的腰背疼痛患者中的验证。
J Occup Rehabil. 2012 Sep;22(3):387-93. doi: 10.1007/s10926-012-9356-2.
6
Perceived functional ability assessed with the spinal function sort: is it valid for European rehabilitation settings in patients with non-specific non-acute low back pain?使用脊柱功能分类评估感知功能能力:对于欧洲康复环境中非特异性非急性腰痛患者是否有效?
Eur Spine J. 2010 Sep;19(9):1527-33. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1429-3. Epub 2010 May 21.
7
Performance-integrated self-report measurement of physical ability.体能综合自评测量。
Spine J. 2010 May;10(5):433-40. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.02.010. Epub 2010 Mar 24.
8
Predictors of nonresponse in a questionnaire-based outcome study of vocational rehabilitation patients.基于问卷调查的职业康复患者结局研究中无应答的预测因素。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Sep;90(9):1499-505. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.03.014.
9
Measurement properties of the neck disability index: a systematic review.颈椎残障指数的测量特性:系统评价。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009 May;39(5):400-17. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2009.2930.
10
The Neck Disability Index: state-of-the-art, 1991-2008.颈部功能障碍指数:1991 - 2008年的最新进展
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008 Sep;31(7):491-502. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.08.006.