• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“我”与“我们”:联合行动的元认知与绩效评估

Me and we: Metacognition and performance evaluation of joint actions.

作者信息

van der Wel Robrecht P R D

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Rutgers University, Camden, NJ, United States.

出版信息

Cognition. 2015 Jul;140:49-59. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.03.011. Epub 2015 Apr 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.03.011
PMID:25880341
Abstract

Recent evidence suggests the existence of we-mode processing, but little is still known about how such processing influences the sense of control during intentional joint actions. To examine this issue, dyads performed a video game in which they moved a dot to the target of their choice out of a set of targets. By having each participant control the dot movements in only one dimension (orthogonal to their partner) and by varying the target locations, participants took on different roles. By chance, they also could have congruent or incongruent intentions prior to the movements. In a decider-follower scenario, where one actor decided on the target, judgments of control and judgments of performance depended on whether a prior intention was instantiated, but not on actor role. This finding is consistent with we-mode processing. When participants had conflicting intentions that needed to be resolved online, both the dominant and the nondominant participant showed a marked reduction in the perceived quality of the performance. Thus, dynamic intention negotiation reduced we-mode processing and shifted it toward I-mode processing. The nondominant actor also reported a strongly reduced sense of control. Implications for theories on the sense of agency and for applied settings are discussed.

摘要

最近的证据表明存在“我们模式”加工,但对于这种加工如何在有意的联合行动中影响控制感,我们仍知之甚少。为了研究这个问题,两人一组进行了一个电子游戏,在游戏中他们将一个点从一组目标中移动到自己选择的目标。通过让每个参与者仅在一个维度(与他们的伙伴垂直)上控制点的移动,并改变目标位置,参与者承担了不同的角色。偶然地,他们在移动之前也可能有一致或不一致的意图。在一个决策者-追随者的情境中,即一个参与者决定目标,控制判断和表现判断取决于先前的意图是否被实例化,而不取决于参与者的角色。这一发现与“我们模式”加工一致。当参与者有需要在线解决的冲突意图时,主导参与者和非主导参与者都表现出表现质量感知的显著下降。因此,动态意图协商减少了“我们模式”加工,并将其转向“我模式”加工。非主导参与者也报告说控制感大幅降低。本文还讨论了对能动性理论和应用场景的启示。

相似文献

1
Me and we: Metacognition and performance evaluation of joint actions.“我”与“我们”:联合行动的元认知与绩效评估
Cognition. 2015 Jul;140:49-59. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.03.011. Epub 2015 Apr 11.
2
The Power of Suggestion: Posthypnotically Induced Changes in the Temporal Binding of Intentional Action Outcomes.暗示的力量:催眠后对意向动作结果的时间绑定的改变。
Psychol Sci. 2017 May;28(5):661-669. doi: 10.1177/0956797616687015. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
3
Experience of action depends on intention, not body movement: an experiment on memory for mens rea.行动经验取决于意图,而不是身体动作:关于犯罪心理记忆的实验。
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Mar;55:122-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.07.022. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
4
Interplay between action and movement intentions during social interaction.社会互动中动作与运动意图的相互作用。
Psychol Sci. 2012 Jan 1;23(1):30-5. doi: 10.1177/0956797611424163. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
5
The influence of performance on action-effect integration in sense of agency.表现对能动感中动作-效应整合的影响。
Conscious Cogn. 2017 Aug;53:89-98. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
6
Control used and control felt: Two sides of the agency coin.被利用的控制与能感觉到的控制:代理关系的两个方面。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Oct;81(7):2304-2319. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01771-y.
7
Time perception and the experience of agency in meditation and hypnosis.冥想与催眠中的时间感知及能动感体验。
Psych J. 2019 Mar;8(1):36-50. doi: 10.1002/pchj.276.
8
The phenomenology of controlling a moving object with another person.与他人共同控制移动物体的现象学。
Cognition. 2014 Sep;132(3):383-97. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.05.002. Epub 2014 May 28.
9
New measures of agency from an adaptive sensorimotor task.从适应性感觉运动任务中获取新的能动性度量。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 21;15(12):e0244113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244113. eCollection 2020.
10
Unravelling intention: distal intentions increase the subjective sense of agency.揭示意图:远端意图增加主观能动性。
Conscious Cogn. 2013 Sep;22(3):810-5. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.05.003. Epub 2013 Jun 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-other distinction modulates the sense of self-agency during joint actions.自我-他人区分在联合行动中调节自我能动性的感觉。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 3;14(1):30055. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80880-7.
2
How a co-actor's (Un-) reliability modulates goal selection in a novel joint goal-setting paradigm.共同行动者的(不可靠性)如何调节新颖的共同目标设定范式中的目标选择。
Psychol Res. 2024 Nov 15;89(1):18. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-02056-2.
3
Sense of agency in joint action: a critical review of we-agency.联合行动中的 agency 感:对“我们的能动性”的批判性综述
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 31;15:1331084. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1331084. eCollection 2024.
4
What is new with Artificial Intelligence? Human-agent interactions through the lens of social agency.人工智能有哪些新进展?从社会能动性视角看人与智能体的交互。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 29;13:954444. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.954444. eCollection 2022.
5
The sense of agency in joint action: An integrative review.共同动作中的主体感:综合述评。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Aug;29(4):1089-1117. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-02051-3. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
6
Temporal binding is enhanced in social contexts.时间绑定在社交情境中增强。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Oct;28(5):1545-1555. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01928-7. Epub 2021 May 4.
7
Not all errors are alike: modulation of error-related neural responses in musical joint action.并非所有错误都相同:音乐共同动作中与错误相关的神经反应的调制。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021 May 4;16(5):512-524. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsab019.
8
The Sense of Agency in Driving Automation.驾驶自动化中的能动感
Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 3;10:2691. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02691. eCollection 2019.
9
Evidence for we-representations during joint action planning.共同动作规划中具身自我表征的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Aug;131:73-83. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.05.029. Epub 2019 May 31.
10
Shared responsibility in collective decisions.集体决策中的共同责任。
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Jun;3(6):554-559. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0596-4. Epub 2019 Apr 22.