• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

门诊单独管理的恶性胸腔积液患者留置胸膜导管与留置胸膜导管加滑石硬化剂的疗效比较(IPC-PLUS):一项随机对照试验的研究方案

The efficacy of indwelling pleural catheter placement versus placement plus talc sclerosant in patients with malignant pleural effusions managed exclusively as outpatients (IPC-PLUS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Bhatnagar Rahul, Kahan Brennan C, Morley Anna J, Keenan Emma K, Miller Robert F, Rahman Najib M, Maskell Nick A

机构信息

Academic Respiratory Unit, University of Bristol, Southmead Hospital, Learning and Research Building, Southmead Road, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.

Respiratory Research, Clinical Research Centre, Southmead Hospital, Southmead Road, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.

出版信息

Trials. 2015 Feb 12;16:48. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0563-y.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-015-0563-y
PMID:25880969
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4333179/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Malignant pleural effusions (MPEs) remain a common problem, with 40,000 new cases in the United Kingdom each year and up to 250,000 in the United States. Traditional management of MPE usually involves an inpatient stay with placement of a chest drain, followed by the instillation of a pleural sclerosing agent such as talc, which aims to minimise further fluid build-up. Despite a good success rate in studies, this approach can be expensive, time-consuming and inconvenient for patients. More recently, an alternative method has become available in the form of indwelling pleural catheters (IPCs), which can be inserted and managed in an outpatient setting. It is currently unknown whether combining talc pleurodesis with IPCs will provide improved pleural symphysis rates over those of IPCs alone.

METHODS/DESIGN: IPC-PLUS is a patient-blind, multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing the combination of talc with an IPC to the use of an IPC alone for inducing pleurodesis in MPEs. The primary outcome is successful pleurodesis at five weeks post-randomisation. This study will recruit 154 patients, with an interim analysis for efficacy after 100 patients, and aims to help to define the future gold standard for outpatient management of patients with symptomatic MPEs.

DISCUSSION

IPC-PLUS is the first RCT to examine the practicality and utility of talc administered via an IPC. The study remains in active recruitment and has the potential to significantly alter how patients requiring pleurodesis for MPE are approached in the future.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was registered with Current Controlled Trials (identifier: ISRCTN73255764 ) on 23 August 2012.

摘要

背景

恶性胸腔积液(MPE)仍然是一个常见问题,在英国每年有40000例新发病例,在美国多达250000例。MPE的传统治疗通常需要住院放置胸腔引流管,随后注入胸膜硬化剂如滑石粉,目的是尽量减少液体进一步积聚。尽管在研究中有较高的成功率,但这种方法可能成本高昂、耗时且给患者带来不便。最近,一种替代方法以留置胸腔导管(IPC)的形式出现,其可以在门诊环境中插入和管理。目前尚不清楚滑石粉胸膜固定术与IPC联合使用是否比单独使用IPC能提高胸膜粘连率。

方法/设计:IPC-PLUS是一项患者盲法、多中心随机对照试验(RCT),比较滑石粉与IPC联合使用和单独使用IPC诱导MPE胸膜固定术的效果。主要结局是随机分组后五周时胸膜固定术成功。本研究将招募154例患者,在100例患者后进行疗效中期分析,旨在帮助确定有症状MPE患者门诊管理的未来金标准。

讨论

IPC-PLUS是第一项研究通过IPC给予滑石粉的实用性和效用的RCT。该研究仍在积极招募患者,有可能显著改变未来对需要进行胸膜固定术治疗MPE患者的处理方式。

试验注册

本试验于2012年8月23日在当前对照试验注册(标识符:ISRCTN73255764)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47c7/4333179/0961dad98347/13063_2015_563_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47c7/4333179/0961dad98347/13063_2015_563_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47c7/4333179/0961dad98347/13063_2015_563_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The efficacy of indwelling pleural catheter placement versus placement plus talc sclerosant in patients with malignant pleural effusions managed exclusively as outpatients (IPC-PLUS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.门诊单独管理的恶性胸腔积液患者留置胸膜导管与留置胸膜导管加滑石硬化剂的疗效比较(IPC-PLUS):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Feb 12;16:48. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0563-y.
2
Interventions for the management of malignant pleural effusions: a network meta-analysis.恶性胸腔积液管理的干预措施:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 21;4(4):CD010529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010529.pub3.
3
Australasian Malignant PLeural Effusion (AMPLE)-3 trial: study protocol for a multi-centre randomised study comparing indwelling pleural catheter (±talc pleurodesis) versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for management of malignant pleural effusion.澳大利亚恶性胸腔积液(AMPLE)-3 试验:一项多中心随机研究的研究方案,比较留置胸腔导管(±滑石粉胸膜固定术)与电视辅助胸腔镜手术治疗恶性胸腔积液。
Trials. 2022 Jun 27;23(1):530. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06405-7.
4
OPTIMUM: a protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing Out Patient Talc slurry via Indwelling pleural catheter for Malignant pleural effusion vs Usual inpatient Management.OPTIMUM:一项多中心随机对照试验方案,比较经留置胸膜导管的门诊滑石粉悬液治疗恶性胸腔积液与常规住院治疗。
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 18;6(10):e012795. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012795.
5
Protocol of the Australasian Malignant Pleural Effusion (AMPLE) trial: a multicentre randomised study comparing indwelling pleural catheter versus talc pleurodesis.澳大利亚恶性胸腔积液(AMPLE)试验方案:一项比较留置胸腔导管与滑石粉胸膜固定术的多中心随机研究。
BMJ Open. 2014 Nov 6;4(11):e006757. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006757.
6
The randomised thoracoscopic talc poudrage+indwelling pleural catheters versus thoracoscopic talc poudrage only in malignant pleural effusion trial (TACTIC): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.随机胸腔镜滑石粉泼洒+留置胸腔引流管与单纯胸腔镜滑石粉泼洒治疗恶性胸腔积液的试验(TACTIC):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2023 May;10(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001682.
7
Fast pleurodesis combining talc poudrage and indwelling pleural catheter for the management of recurrent malignant pleural effusions.滑石粉喷洒联合留置胸腔导管快速胸膜固定术治疗复发性恶性胸腔积液
Respir Med Res. 2024 Nov;86:101124. doi: 10.1016/j.resmer.2024.101124. Epub 2024 Jun 22.
8
The Hospital and Patient Burden of Indwelling Pleural Catheters: A Retrospective Case Series of 210 Indwelling Pleural Catheter Insertions.留置胸腔导管的医院和患者负担:210 例留置胸腔导管插入术的回顾性病例系列。
Respiration. 2019;97(1):70-77. doi: 10.1159/000491934. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
9
The use of indwelling pleural catheters for the treatment of malignant pleural effusions.留置胸腔导管治疗恶性胸腔积液。
Expert Rev Respir Med. 2019 Jul;13(7):659-664. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2019.1627203. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
10
Protocol of the Australasian Malignant Pleural Effusion-2 (AMPLE-2) trial: a multicentre randomised study of aggressive versus symptom-guided drainage via indwelling pleural catheters.澳大利亚恶性胸腔积液-2(AMPLE-2)试验方案:一项关于通过留置胸腔导管进行积极引流与症状引导引流的多中心随机研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 5;6(7):e011480. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011480.

引用本文的文献

1
Indwelling pleural catheters and medical thoracoscopy.胸腔留置导管与内科胸腔镜检查
Breathe (Sheff). 2025 Jul 15;21(3):240251. doi: 10.1183/20734735.0251-2024. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Malignant Pleural Effusion: A Multidisciplinary Approach.恶性胸腔积液:多学科治疗方法
Open Respir Arch. 2024 Jun 19;6(4):100349. doi: 10.1016/j.opresp.2024.100349. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec.
3
ERS International Congress 2023: highlights from the Thoracic Oncology Assembly.2023年欧洲呼吸学会国际大会:胸部肿瘤学大会亮点

本文引用的文献

1
The risks and rewards of covariate adjustment in randomized trials: an assessment of 12 outcomes from 8 studies.在随机试验中协变量调整的风险和收益:来自 8 项研究的 12 个结局评估。
Trials. 2014 Apr 23;15:139. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-139.
2
Assessing potential sources of clustering in individually randomised trials.评估个体随机试验中聚集现象的潜在来源。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Apr 16;13:58. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-58.
3
Reporting and analysis of trials using stratified randomisation in leading medical journals: review and reanalysis.
ERJ Open Res. 2024 Feb 26;10(1). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00860-2023. eCollection 2024 Jan.
4
Malignant pleural disease.恶性胸膜疾病
Breathe (Sheff). 2023 Dec;19(4):230145. doi: 10.1183/20734735.0145-2023. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
5
Malignant pleural effusion: current understanding and therapeutic approach.恶性胸腔积液:当前的认识和治疗方法。
Respir Res. 2024 Jan 19;25(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-02684-7.
6
Use of tunneled pleural catheters in chronic empyema: Two case reports and brief review of the literature.隧道式胸腔导管在慢性脓胸治疗中的应用:两例病例报告及文献简要回顾
Respir Med Case Rep. 2022 Oct 11;40:101754. doi: 10.1016/j.rmcr.2022.101754. eCollection 2022.
7
Malignant Pleural Effusions-A Review of Current Guidelines and Practices.恶性胸腔积液——当前指南与实践综述
J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 26;10(23):5535. doi: 10.3390/jcm10235535.
8
Talc pleurodesis in malignant pleural effusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.滑石粉胸膜固定术治疗恶性胸腔积液:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 May;69(5):832-842. doi: 10.1007/s11748-020-01549-2. Epub 2020 Nov 22.
9
Manometry performed at indwelling pleural catheter insertion to predict unexpandable lung.在留置胸腔导管插入时进行测压以预测肺不可扩张。
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Apr;12(4):1374-1384. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.02.25.
10
Making cold malignant pleural effusions hot: driving novel immunotherapies.让冰冷的恶性胸腔积液“热”起来:推动新型免疫疗法发展
Oncoimmunology. 2019 Jan 22;8(4):e1554969. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2018.1554969. eCollection 2019.
主要医学期刊中分层随机化试验的报告和分析:综述与再分析。
BMJ. 2012 Sep 14;345:e5840. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5840.
4
Effect of an indwelling pleural catheter vs chest tube and talc pleurodesis for relieving dyspnea in patients with malignant pleural effusion: the TIME2 randomized controlled trial.留置胸腔导管与胸腔引流管和滑石粉胸膜固定术治疗恶性胸腔积液呼吸困难的效果:TIME2 随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2012 Jun 13;307(22):2383-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5535.
5
Improper analysis of trials randomised using stratified blocks or minimisation.分层块或最小化随机试验的不当分析。
Stat Med. 2012 Feb 20;31(4):328-40. doi: 10.1002/sim.4431. Epub 2011 Dec 4.
6
Strategy for intention to treat analysis in randomised trials with missing outcome data.随机试验中缺失结局数据的意向治疗分析策略。
BMJ. 2011 Feb 7;342:d40. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d40.
7
Management of a malignant pleural effusion: British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline 2010.恶性胸腔积液的管理:英国胸科学会胸膜疾病指南2010
Thorax. 2010 Aug;65 Suppl 2:ii32-40. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.136994.
8
Treatment of malignant pleural effusion: PleuRx catheter or talc pleurodesis? A cost-effectiveness analysis.恶性胸腔积液的治疗:PleuRx 导管还是滑石粉胸膜固定术?成本效益分析。
J Palliat Med. 2010 Jan;13(1):59-65. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2009.0220.
9
Management of malignant pleural effusions using the Pleur(x) catheter.使用Pleur(x)导管治疗恶性胸腔积液
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Mar;85(3):1049-55. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.11.039.
10
Identification of clinical factors predicting Pleurx catheter removal in patients treated for malignant pleural effusion.识别接受恶性胸腔积液治疗患者中预测Pleurx导管拔除的临床因素。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 Jan;33(1):89-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.10.002. Epub 2007 Nov 5.