Rhee Jay W, Petteys Rory J, Anaizi Amjad N, Sandhu Faheem A, Voyadzis Jean-Marc
Department of Neurosurgery, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, 3800 Reservoir Road, NW, PHC-7, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.
Eur Spine J. 2015 Nov;24(11):2546-54. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3934-x. Epub 2015 Apr 18.
Lateral transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion (LTIF) is an accepted treatment for degenerative lumbar disc disease. Bilateral percutaneous transfacet (TF) fixation is a promising option for stabilization following LTIF. Here, we describe our experience with this technique and assess the clinical outcomes and efficacy.
Thirty-eight consecutive patients were identified who underwent LTIF followed by bilateral percutaneous transfacet fixation in the lateral position. Preoperative and 1-year postoperative VAS scores, and operative data were prospectively recorded. One-year outcomes were also assessed according to the MacNab criteria. Fusion was assessed at 1 year via computed tomography and dynamic radiography. Two-tailed Student's t test was used to compare VAS scores.
Twenty-six patients underwent fusion at L4-5, 11 at L3-4, and one at L2-3; two patients were lost to follow-up. Mean operative time was 148.0 ± 47.9 min; mean blood loss was 33.0 ± 26.1 ml; mean hospital stay was 53.5 ± 51.2 h. Mean preoperative VAS scores for back and leg pain were 7.4 ± 3.0 and 7.0 ± 2.9, respectively; mean postoperative VAS scores for back and leg pain were 1.9 ± 2.4 (p < 0.0001) and 2.0 ± 3.0 (p < 0.0001), respectively. Most (89 %) patients had some relief, 72 % good to excellent and 17 % fair outcomes; eleven percent had little to no relief. There was one postoperative complication (pulmonary embolus). All patients had evidence of solid bony fusion.
Percutaneous transfacet fixation in the lateral position is a safe and effective alternative for fixation after LTIF and may be associated with shorter operative time and less blood loss than other posterior fixation techniques.
腰大肌外侧腰椎椎间融合术(LTIF)是治疗退变性腰椎间盘疾病的一种公认方法。双侧经皮关节突(TF)固定是LTIF术后稳定的一种有前景的选择。在此,我们描述我们使用该技术的经验并评估临床结果和疗效。
连续纳入38例行LTIF并在侧卧位下行双侧经皮关节突固定的患者。前瞻性记录术前及术后1年的视觉模拟评分(VAS)以及手术数据。还根据MacNab标准评估1年的结果。通过计算机断层扫描和动态X线摄影在1年时评估融合情况。采用双尾Student t检验比较VAS评分。
26例患者在L4 - 5节段融合,11例在L3 - 4节段融合,1例在L2 - 3节段融合;2例患者失访。平均手术时间为148.0±47.9分钟;平均失血量为33.0±26.1毫升;平均住院时间为53.5±51.2小时。术前背部和腿部疼痛的平均VAS评分分别为7.4±3.0和7.0±2.9;术后背部和腿部疼痛的平均VAS评分分别为1.9±2.4(p < 0.0001)和2.0±3.0(p < 0.0001)。大多数(89%)患者有一定程度缓解,72%为良好至优秀,17%为一般;11%几乎没有缓解。有1例术后并发症(肺栓塞)。所有患者均有坚实骨融合的证据。
侧卧位经皮关节突固定是LTIF术后固定的一种安全有效的替代方法,与其他后路固定技术相比,可能手术时间更短、失血量更少。