Suppr超能文献

DSM-5 短式人格量表(PID-5-SF):在挪威人群中与大五人格特质和病理性信念的心理测量学特征及关联。

The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Short Form (PID-5-SF): psychometric properties and association with big five traits and pathological beliefs in a Norwegian population.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Tromsø, 9037, Tromsø, Norway.

Sámi Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Mental Health and Substance Use, Finnmark Hospital Trust, Karasjok, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Psychol. 2016 Dec 7;4(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s40359-016-0169-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the publication of the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), an alternative model for personality disorders based on personality dysfunction and pathological personality traits was introduced. The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) is a 220-item self-report inventory designed to assess the personality traits of this model. Recently, a short 100-item version of the PID-5 (PID-5-SF) has been developed. The aim of this study was to investigate the score reliability and structure of the Norwegian PID-5-SF. Further, criterion validity with the five factor model of personality (FFM) and pathological personality beliefs was examined.

METHODS

A derivation sample of university students (N = 503) completed the PID-5, the Big Five Inventory (BFI), and the Personality Beliefs Questionnaire - Short Form (PBQ-SF), whereas a replication sample of 127 students completed the PID-5-SF along with the aforementioned measures.

RESULTS

The short PID-5 showed overall good score reliability and structural validity. The associations with FFM traits and pathological personality beliefs were conceptually coherent and similar for the two forms of the PID-5.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that the Norwegian PID-5 short form is a reliable and efficient measure of the trait criterion of the alternative model for personality disorders in DSM-5.

摘要

背景

随着《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》(DSM-5)第五版的出版,一种基于人格功能障碍和病理性人格特征的人格障碍替代模型被引入。DSM-5 人格量表(PID-5)是一种 220 项的自评量表,旨在评估该模型的人格特征。最近,开发了一种短的 100 项版本的 PID-5(PID-5-SF)。本研究旨在探讨挪威 PID-5-SF 的评分可靠性和结构。此外,还检验了与五因素人格模型(FFM)和病理性人格信念的标准效度。

方法

一个大学生样本(N=503)完成了 PID-5、大五人格量表(BFI)和人格信念问卷-短式(PBQ-SF),而 127 名学生的复制样本则完成了 PID-5-SF 以及上述测量。

结果

短 PID-5 显示出整体良好的评分可靠性和结构效度。与 FFM 特质和病理性人格信念的关联在概念上是一致的,两种形式的 PID-5 之间也是相似的。

结论

结果表明,挪威 PID-5 短式是 DSM-5 中人格障碍替代模型特质标准的一种可靠、有效的测量工具。

相似文献

3
[Validation of a French translation of Krueger's personality inventory for DSM-5 in its brief form (PID-5 BF)].
Encephale. 2018 Feb;44(1):9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.07.006. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
7
Hierarchical Structure and Cross-Cultural Measurement Invariance of the Norwegian Version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5.
J Pers Assess. 2017 Mar-Apr;99(2):204-210. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2016.1223682. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
9
The Construct Validity of the Dutch Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Personality Disorders (PID-5) in a Clinical Sample.
Assessment. 2016 Feb;23(1):42-51. doi: 10.1177/1073191115575069. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
10
The psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5.
Scand J Psychol. 2017 Oct;58(5):468-475. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12383. Epub 2017 Aug 22.

引用本文的文献

5
Cognitions in antisocial personality and their association with "dark" traits.
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 22;14(1):19504. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69473-6.
8
Cross-cultural Study of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) across the Portuguese and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) Community and Clinical Populations.
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2022 Aug 26;18:e174501792207130. doi: 10.2174/17450179-v18-e2207130. eCollection 2022.
9
Personality change in a trial of psilocybin therapy v. escitalopram treatment for depression.
Psychol Med. 2024 Jan;54(1):178-192. doi: 10.1017/S0033291723001514. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
10
Personality traits and alcohol consumption: Secondary analysis of the Self-Match Study.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2022 Jun;46(6):1110-1120. doi: 10.1111/acer.14841. Epub 2022 May 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments.
Psychol Assess. 2019 Dec;31(12):1412-1427. doi: 10.1037/pas0000626. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
2
Hierarchical Structure and Cross-Cultural Measurement Invariance of the Norwegian Version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5.
J Pers Assess. 2017 Mar-Apr;99(2):204-210. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2016.1223682. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
3
Trait Variance and Response Style Variance in the Scales of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5).
J Pers Assess. 2017 Mar-Apr;99(2):192-203. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2016.1208210. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
4
Relating DSM-5 section II and section III personality disorder diagnostic classification systems to treatment planning.
Compr Psychiatry. 2016 Jul;68:48-55. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2016.03.010. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
5
DSM-5 section III personality traits and section II personality disorders in a Flemish community sample.
Psychiatry Res. 2016 Apr 30;238:290-298. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.02.056. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
7
Continuity between interview-rated personality disorders and self-reported DSM-5 traits in a Danish psychiatric sample.
Personal Disord. 2017 Jul;8(3):261-267. doi: 10.1037/per0000171. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
8
Capturing the DSM-5 Alternative Personality Disorder Model Traits in the Five-Factor Model's Nomological Net.
J Pers. 2017 Apr;85(2):220-231. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12235. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
10
A Psychometric Review of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5): Current Status and Future Directions.
J Pers Assess. 2016;98(1):62-81. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2015.1107572. Epub 2015 Nov 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验