• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基尔肌肉骨骼患者报告结局量表(MSK-PROM)的开发与验证

Development and Validation of the Keele Musculoskeletal Patient Reported Outcome Measure (MSK-PROM).

作者信息

Hill Jonathan C, Thomas Elaine, Hill Susan, Foster Nadine E, van der Windt Danielle A

机构信息

Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Apr 30;10(4):e0124557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124557. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0124557
PMID:25928807
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4415910/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a patient report outcome measure (PROM) for clinical practice that can monitor health status of patients with a range of musculoskeletal (MSK) disorders.

METHODS

Constructs for inclusion in the MSK-PROM were identified from a consensus process involving patients with musculoskeletal conditions, clinicians, purchasers of healthcare services, and primary care researchers. Psychometric properties of the brief tool, including face and construct validity, repeatability and responsiveness were assessed in a sample of patients with musculoskeletal pain consulting physiotherapy services in the United Kingdom (n=425).

RESULTS

The consensus process identified 10 prioritised domains for monitoring musculoskeletal health status: pain intensity, quality of life, physical capacity, interference with social/leisure activities, emotional well-being, severity of most difficult thing, activities and roles, understanding independence, and overall impact. As the EuroQol (EQ-5D-5L) is a widely adopted PROMs tool and covers the first four domains listed, to reduce patient burden to a minimum the MSK-PROM was designed to capture the remaining six prioritised domains which are not measured by the EQ-5D-5L. The tool demonstrated excellent reliability, construct validity, responsiveness and acceptability to patients and clinicians for use in clinical practice.

CONCLUSION

We have validated a brief patient reported outcome measure (MSK-PROM) for use in clinical practice to measure musculoskeletal health status and monitor outcomes over time using domains that are meaningful to patients and sensitive to change. Further work will establish whether the MSK-PROM is useful in other musculoskeletal healthcare settings.

摘要

目的

开发并验证一种用于临床实践的患者报告结局测量工具(PROM),该工具可监测一系列肌肉骨骼(MSK)疾病患者的健康状况。

方法

通过一个由肌肉骨骼疾病患者、临床医生、医疗服务购买者和初级保健研究人员参与的共识过程,确定纳入MSK-PROM的指标。在英国接受物理治疗服务的肌肉骨骼疼痛患者样本(n = 425)中,评估了该简短工具的心理测量特性,包括表面效度和结构效度、重复性和反应性。

结果

共识过程确定了10个监测肌肉骨骼健康状况的优先领域:疼痛强度、生活质量、身体能力、对社交/休闲活动的干扰、情绪健康、最困难事情的严重程度、活动和角色、对独立性的理解以及总体影响。由于欧洲生活质量量表(EQ-5D-5L)是一种广泛采用的PROMs工具,涵盖了列出的前四个领域,为了将患者负担降至最低,MSK-PROM被设计用于捕捉EQ-5D-5L未测量的其余六个优先领域。该工具在临床实践中对患者和临床医生显示出优异的可靠性、结构效度、反应性和可接受性。

结论

我们已经验证了一种简短的患者报告结局测量工具(MSK-PROM),可用于临床实践,以测量肌肉骨骼健康状况,并使用对患者有意义且对变化敏感的领域随时间监测结局。进一步的工作将确定MSK-PROM在其他肌肉骨骼医疗环境中是否有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46e0/4415910/1867a0ef8298/pone.0124557.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46e0/4415910/d1767af564a2/pone.0124557.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46e0/4415910/1867a0ef8298/pone.0124557.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46e0/4415910/d1767af564a2/pone.0124557.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46e0/4415910/1867a0ef8298/pone.0124557.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of the Keele Musculoskeletal Patient Reported Outcome Measure (MSK-PROM).基尔肌肉骨骼患者报告结局量表(MSK-PROM)的开发与验证
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 30;10(4):e0124557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124557. eCollection 2015.
2
Development and initial cohort validation of the Arthritis Research UK Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire (MSK-HQ) for use across musculoskeletal care pathways.英国关节炎研究学会肌肉骨骼健康问卷(MSK-HQ)的开发及初始队列验证,用于整个肌肉骨骼护理路径。
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 5;6(8):e012331. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012331.
3
Validation of the Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire (MSK-HQ) in primary care patients with musculoskeletal pain.肌肉骨骼健康问卷(MSK-HQ)在基层医疗肌肉骨骼疼痛患者中的验证。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2020 Oct;50(5):813-820. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.06.022. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
4
Cross Cultural Adaptation and Validation of Hindi Version of Versus Arthritis Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire (MSK-HQ-Hi).《对抗关节炎肌肉骨骼健康问卷(MSK-HQ-Hi)印地语版的跨文化适应与验证》
Musculoskeletal Care. 2025 Jun;23(2):e70097. doi: 10.1002/msc.70097.
5
German translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire: a cohort study.肌肉骨骼健康问卷的德译、跨文化调适与验证:一项队列研究。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2020 Dec;56(6):771-779. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.20.06054-2. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
6
Determining responsiveness and meaningful changes for the Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire (MSK-HQ) for use across musculoskeletal care pathways.确定肌肉骨骼健康问卷(MSK-HQ)在整个肌肉骨骼护理途径中的反应性和有意义的变化。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 3;9(10):e025357. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025357.
7
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Arabic Version of Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire (MSK-HQ-Ar).跨文化调适与验证阿拉伯文版肌肉骨骼健康问卷(MSK-HQ-Ar)。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 17;17(14):5168. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145168.
8
Validation of the Keele STarT MSK Tool for Patients With Musculoskeletal Pain in United States-based Outpatient Physical Therapy Settings.美国门诊物理治疗环境中肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的 Keele STarT MSK 工具的验证。
J Pain. 2024 Jul;25(7):104475. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2024.01.340. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
9
Validity and reliability of the Danish version of the Short Form Brief Pain Inventory.丹麦语版简明疼痛问卷简表的效度与信度
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2025 Feb;75:103242. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103242. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
10
Who Benefits From Hip Arthroplasty or Knee Arthroplasty? Preoperative Patient-reported Outcome Thresholds Predict Meaningful Improvement.哪些人能从髋关节置换术或膝关节置换术中获益?术前患者报告的结局阈值可预测有意义的改善。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 May 1;482(5):867-881. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002994. Epub 2024 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding data visualization techniques in qualitative studies used to develop and validate patient-reported outcome measures: a targeted literature review.理解用于开发和验证患者报告结局指标的定性研究中的数据可视化技术:一项针对性文献综述。
Qual Life Res. 2025 Apr 25. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-03964-5.
2
Sequence Analysis to Phenotype Health Care Patterns in Adults With Musculoskeletal Conditions Using Primary Care Electronic Health Records.利用初级保健电子健康记录对患有肌肉骨骼疾病的成年人的医疗保健模式进行序列分析。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2025 Jul;77(7):906-915. doi: 10.1002/acr.25514. Epub 2025 Apr 19.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Integrating the use of patient-reported outcomes for both clinical practice and performance measurement: views of experts from 3 countries.整合患者报告结局在临床实践和绩效评估中的应用:来自三个国家的专家观点
Milbank Q. 2014 Dec;92(4):754-75. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12091.
2
The experiences of professionals with using information from patient-reported outcome measures to improve the quality of healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative research.专业人员运用患者报告结局测量信息以提高医疗质量的经验:一项定性研究的系统评价
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Jun;23(6):508-18. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002524. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
3
Cross-cultural adaptation and reliability of the European Portuguese version of the Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire: A methodological study.
《肌肉骨骼健康问卷》欧洲葡萄牙语版的跨文化调适与信度:一项方法学研究
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 8;19(8):e0308623. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308623. eCollection 2024.
4
Validation of the Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire in a general population sample: a cross-sectional online survey in Hungary.肌肉骨骼健康问卷在一般人群样本中的验证:匈牙利的一项横断面在线调查。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Aug 13;23(1):771. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05716-9.
5
The Brighton musculoskeletal Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (BmPROM): An assessment of validity, reliability, and responsiveness.布莱顿肌肉骨骼患者报告结局量表(BmPROM):效度、信度及反应度评估
Physiother Res Int. 2018 Jul;23(3):e1715. doi: 10.1002/pri.1715. Epub 2018 May 11.
6
Prediction of Persistent Musculoskeletal Pain at 12 Months: A Secondary Analysis of the Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome (OSPRO) Validation Cohort Study.12 个月时持续性肌肉骨骼疼痛的预测:转诊和结局最优预测筛查(OSPRO)验证队列研究的二次分析。
Phys Ther. 2018 May 1;98(5):290-301. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzy021.
7
Increasing Capacity for the Treatment of Common Musculoskeletal Problems: A Non-Inferiority RCT and Economic Analysis of Corticosteroid Injection for Shoulder Pain Comparing a Physiotherapist and Orthopaedic Surgeon.提高常见肌肉骨骼问题的治疗能力:一项非劣效性随机对照试验及针对肩痛的皮质类固醇注射治疗的经济学分析,比较物理治疗师和骨科医生的疗效
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 15;11(9):e0162679. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162679. eCollection 2016.
8
Development and initial cohort validation of the Arthritis Research UK Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire (MSK-HQ) for use across musculoskeletal care pathways.英国关节炎研究学会肌肉骨骼健康问卷(MSK-HQ)的开发及初始队列验证,用于整个肌肉骨骼护理路径。
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 5;6(8):e012331. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012331.
Is it all about a pain in the back?
难道这一切都是因为背痛吗?
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2013 Oct;27(5):613-23. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2013.09.008. Epub 2013 Oct 5.
4
Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study.EQ-5D-5L 与 EQ-5D-3L 在八个患者群体中的测量性能比较:一项多国家研究。
Qual Life Res. 2013 Sep;22(7):1717-27. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0322-4. Epub 2012 Nov 25.
5
The barriers and facilitators to routine outcome measurement by allied health professionals in practice: a systematic review.卫生保健专业人员在实践中进行常规结果测量的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 May 22;12:96. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-96.
6
Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L).新的 EQ-5D 五维版本(EQ-5D-5L)的制定和初步测试。
Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x. Epub 2011 Apr 9.
7
Bridging the gap between best evidence and best practice in mental health.弥合心理健康最佳证据与最佳实践之间的差距。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Feb;30(1):127-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.10.004.
8
The applications of PROs in clinical practice: what are they, do they work, and why?患者报告结局(PROs)在临床实践中的应用:它们是什么、是否有效以及原因何在?
Qual Life Res. 2009 Feb;18(1):115-23. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9430-6. Epub 2008 Dec 23.
9
Benchmarking physical therapy clinic performance: statistical methods to enhance internal validity when using observational data.物理治疗诊所绩效的基准评估:使用观察性数据时提高内部效度的统计方法。
Phys Ther. 2008 Sep;88(9):1078-87. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20070327. Epub 2008 Aug 8.
10
A primary care back pain screening tool: identifying patient subgroups for initial treatment.一种初级保健背痛筛查工具:识别适合初始治疗的患者亚组。
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 May 15;59(5):632-41. doi: 10.1002/art.23563.