• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

部分-整体决策中的检索与比较过程

Retrieval and comparison processes in part--whole decisions.

作者信息

Chaffin R, Herrmann D J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Trenton State College.

出版信息

J Gen Psychol. 1989 Oct;116(4):393-406. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1989.9921126.

DOI:10.1080/00221309.1989.9921126
PMID:2592958
Abstract

Undergraduate students were presented with word pairs (e.g., egg-yolk) and were timed as they decided whether one word named part of the thing named by the other word. In Experiment 1, "no" responses to nonpart pairs (e.g., fish-flaps) were slowed by the similarity of the stimulus part (flaps) to a part that the stimulus object did possess (fins). This suggested that decisions were made by retrieving parts of the stimulus object from memory and comparing them to the stimulus part. Whereas the parts used as stimuli in Experiment 1 were nonspecific, belonging to several different types of object (e.g., wheel), those selected for Experiment 2 were specific to a single type of object (e.g., thumb). In Experiment 2, "no" responses to nonpart pairs (e.g., foot-thumb) were slowed by similarity of the stimulus object (foot) to an object that the stimulus part (thumb) belonged to (hand). This suggested that decisions were made by retrieving the object to which the stimulus part belonged and comparing it to the stimulus object. The results support a hybrid model of part-whole decisions that includes directed retrieval of relational knowledge from memory and a comparison process.

摘要

给本科生呈现单词对(例如,蛋黄),并记录他们判断一个单词是否命名了另一个单词所命名事物的一部分时所用的时间。在实验1中,对非部分对(例如,鱼-鳍)的“否”反应因刺激部分(鳍)与刺激对象确实拥有的一个部分(鳍)的相似性而变慢。这表明决策是通过从记忆中检索刺激对象的部分并将它们与刺激部分进行比较来做出的。实验1中用作刺激的部分是非特定的,属于几种不同类型的对象(例如,轮子),而实验2中选择的部分则特定于单一类型的对象(例如,拇指)。在实验2中,对非部分对(例如,脚-拇指)的“否”反应因刺激对象(脚)与刺激部分(拇指)所属对象(手)的相似性而变慢。这表明决策是通过检索刺激部分所属的对象并将其与刺激对象进行比较来做出的。结果支持了一个部分-整体决策的混合模型,该模型包括从记忆中定向检索关系知识和一个比较过程。

相似文献

1
Retrieval and comparison processes in part--whole decisions.部分-整体决策中的检索与比较过程
J Gen Psychol. 1989 Oct;116(4):393-406. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1989.9921126.
2
Effects of relation similarity on part-whole decisions.关系相似性对整体-部分决策的影响。
J Gen Psychol. 1988 Apr;115(2):131-9. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1988.9711096.
3
Automatic and directed search processes in solving simple semantic-memory problems.解决简单语义记忆问题中的自动和定向搜索过程。
Mem Cognit. 1989 Sep;17(5):617-26. doi: 10.3758/bf03197084.
4
Priming for new associations in animacy decision: evidence for context dependency.启动对有生命性判断中新型关联的认知:情境依赖性证据
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2004 Oct;57(7):1211-31. doi: 10.1080/02724980343000738.
5
Acquisition and retention of verbal associations to olfactory and abstract visual stimuli of varying similarity.对不同相似度的嗅觉和抽象视觉刺激的言语联想的习得与保持。
J Exp Psychol Hum Learn. 1977 Jan;3(1):37-51.
6
The roles of similarity in transfer: separating retrievability from inferential soundness.相似性在迁移中的作用:区分可检索性与推理合理性。
Cogn Psychol. 1993 Oct;25(4):524-75. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1993.1013.
7
Priorities in children's expectations about object label reference: form over color.儿童对物体标签指代的期望优先级:形状优于颜色。
Child Dev. 1989 Dec;60(6):1291-306.
8
Limits of the retrieval-inhibition construct: list segregation in directed forgetting.提取抑制概念的局限性:指向性遗忘中的列表分离
J Gen Psychol. 2003 Oct;130(4):359-79. doi: 10.1080/00221300309601164.
9
Induction of a memory retrieval strategy by young children.幼儿对记忆检索策略的诱导。
J Exp Child Psychol. 1996 Jul;62(2):243-71. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1996.0030.
10
Assessing the inhibitory account of retrieval-induced forgetting with implicit-memory tests.使用内隐记忆测试评估提取诱发遗忘的抑制理论。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Nov;28(6):1111-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations to unfamiliar words: learning the meanings of new words.与陌生词汇的关联:学习新单词的含义。
Mem Cognit. 1997 Mar;25(2):203-26. doi: 10.3758/bf03201113.