Baumann Sophie, Gaertner Beate, Schnuerer Inga, Haberecht Katja, John Ulrich, Freyer-Adam Jennis
University Medicine Greifswald, Institute of Social Medicine and Prevention, Walther-Rathenau-Str. 48, 17475 Greifswald, Germany; German Centre for Cardiovascular Research, Partner Site Greifswald, Fleischmannstr. 42-44, 17489 Greifswald, Germany.
Robert Koch Institute, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, General-Pape-Str. 62-66, 12101 Berlin, Germany.
Addict Behav. 2015 Sep;48:5-11. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.04.007. Epub 2015 Apr 18.
When intentions are expressed, e.g., when filling in a health questionnaire, people may have unrealistic beliefs towards behavior change resulting in strong intentions to change. These may fail to correspond to reality when the behavior actually should be performed. Belief incongruence was tested as a possible source of the intention-behavior gap.
The study sample consisted of 433 job agency clients with at-risk alcohol use (64% men, mean age=30.6 (SD=11.6) years). Behavioral, normative, and control beliefs, intention, and alcohol use were assessed at baseline and three months later. The influence of belief incongruence on the intention-behavior gap was examined using latent interaction models.
The gap between stated intentions and at-risk alcohol use three months later was larger when the according normative beliefs were incongruent (total effect: b=-0.44, p<0.05 for persons with congruent beliefs vs. b=-0.06, p>0.10 for persons with incongruent beliefs). When controlling for the mediating effect of changes in intentions, the association between belief incongruence and intention-behavior gap was attenuated (direct effect: b=-0.56, p<0.01 for persons with congruent beliefs vs. b=-0.28, p<0.05 for persons with incongruent beliefs). Neither behavioral belief incongruence nor control belief incongruence was significantly associated with the intention-behavior gap.
Normative belief incongruence may contribute to the gap between intentions to adhere to recommended drinking limits and subsequent at-risk alcohol use. Focusing on the reduction of misperceptions about drinking norms could help to increase the proportion of persons who succeed in translating their intentions into behavior.
当人们表达意图时,例如在填写健康调查问卷时,可能会对行为改变持有不切实际的信念,从而产生强烈的改变意图。而当实际需要执行该行为时,这些意图可能与现实不符。信念不一致被作为意图-行为差距的一个可能来源进行了测试。
研究样本包括433名有酒精使用风险的职业介绍所客户(64%为男性,平均年龄 = 30.6(标准差 = 11.6)岁)。在基线时和三个月后评估行为、规范和控制信念、意图以及酒精使用情况。使用潜在交互模型检验信念不一致对意图-行为差距的影响。
当相应的规范信念不一致时,三个月后陈述的意图与有酒精使用风险之间的差距更大(总体效应:信念一致者b = -0.44,p < 0.05;信念不一致者b = -0.06,p > 0.10)。在控制意图变化的中介效应后,信念不一致与意图-行为差距之间的关联减弱(直接效应:信念一致者b = -0.56,p < 0.01;信念不一致者b = -0.28,p < 0.05)。行为信念不一致和控制信念不一致均与意图-行为差距无显著关联。
规范信念不一致可能导致坚持推荐饮酒限量的意图与随后的有酒精使用风险之间的差距。关注减少对饮酒规范的误解可能有助于提高成功将意图转化为行为的人群比例。