Suppr超能文献

美国以白人为主的成年人中使用大麻积极结果量表(POCUS)的编制与验证。

Development and Validation of the Positive Outcomes of Cannabis Use Scale (POCUS) Among Predominantly White Adults in the United States.

机构信息

Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.

Emma Pendleton Bradley Hospital, Riverside, RI, USA.

出版信息

Assessment. 2025 Jan;32(1):14-31. doi: 10.1177/10731911241240618. Epub 2024 Mar 28.

Abstract

Operant conditioning and social learning theories suggest that positive cannabis use-related outcomes are a primary contributor to maintained use and risk for dependence. However, currently there does not exist a reliable, validated measure of positive cannabis-related outcomes. This study sought to develop and psychometrically evaluate the Positive Outcomes of Cannabis Use Scale (POCUS). We collected three samples, college students ( = 883), community adults ( = 214), and college students ( = 615), of predominantly White adults in the United States who completed an online survey. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses evaluated scale structure and identified four factors: social enhancement, mood enhancement, cognitive enhancement, and sexual enhancement. Positive outcomes were positively associated with recent use, controlling for expectancies and negative outcomes. Positive outcomes were also differentiated from positive expectancies and more influential in predicting typical use frequency. Findings indicate that the POCUS is psychometrically sound and clinically useful for measuring positive cannabis use-related outcomes among predominantly White adults in the United States.

摘要

操作性条件作用和社会学习理论表明,积极的大麻使用相关结果是维持使用和依赖风险的主要因素。然而,目前还没有可靠的、经过验证的积极大麻相关结果的衡量标准。本研究旨在开发和心理计量评估大麻使用的积极结果量表(POCUS)。我们收集了三个样本,分别是大学生(n=883)、社区成年人(n=214)和大学生(n=615),这些参与者都是来自美国的以白人为主的成年人,他们完成了一项在线调查。探索性和验证性因子分析评估了量表结构,并确定了四个因素:社交增强、情绪增强、认知增强和性增强。积极的结果与近期使用呈正相关,同时控制了预期和消极结果。积极的结果也与积极的预期不同,并更能预测典型的使用频率。研究结果表明,POCUS 在心理计量学上是可靠的,并且在美国以白人为主体的成年人中测量积极的大麻使用相关结果是具有临床意义的。

相似文献

3
Development and validation of the Comprehensive Cannabis Motives Questionnaire (CCMQ).综合大麻动机问卷(CCMQ)的编制与验证
J Psychopharmacol. 2025 Jul;39(7):703-714. doi: 10.1177/02698811251341371. Epub 2025 Jun 19.
4
Psychosocial interventions for cannabis use disorder.针对大麻使用障碍的心理社会干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 5;2016(5):CD005336. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005336.pub4.

本文引用的文献

1
A Burning Problem: Cannabis Lessons Learned from Colorado.一个亟待解决的问题:从科罗拉多州汲取的大麻教训
Addict Res Theory. 2018;26(1):3-10. doi: 10.1080/16066359.2017.1315410. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
4
An examination of the acquired preparedness model among college student marijuana users.大学生大麻使用者习得准备模型研究。
J Am Coll Health. 2022 Oct;70(7):2050-2060. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2020.1842419. Epub 2021 Feb 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验