Kim Jin Hee, Park Hye Yin, Jeon Jung Dae, Kho Younglim, Kim Seung-Kyu, Park Min-Seon, Hong Yun-Chul
Department of Environmental Health, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 110-799, Republic of Korea.
Eur J Nutr. 2016 Apr;55(3):1011-20. doi: 10.1007/s00394-015-0915-0. Epub 2015 May 5.
There is limited evidence whether environmental exposure to perfluorinated compounds (PFCs) affects insulin resistance (IR) and whether vitamin C intake protects against the adverse effect of PFCs. This study was carried out to investigate the effect of PFCs on IR through oxidative stress, and the effects of a 4-week consumption of vitamin C supplement compared placebo on development of IR by PFCs.
For a double-blind, community-based, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover intervention of vitamin C, we assigned 141 elderly subjects to both vitamin C and placebo treatments for 4 weeks. We measured serum levels of PFCs to estimate PFC exposures and urinary levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) and 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) for oxidative stress. We also measured levels of fasting glucose and insulin and derived the homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) index to assess IR.
Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorododecanoic acid (PFDoDA) levels were found to be positively associated with HOMA index at the baseline and after placebo treatment. Risks of IR for the top decile of PFOS and PFDoDA exposures were significantly elevated compared with those with lower PFOS and PFDoDA exposures (both, P < 0.0001). However, the effects of PFOS and PFDoDA on HOMA disappeared after vitamin C supplementation (both, P > 0.30). Furthermore, PFOS and PFDoDA levels were also significantly associated with MDA and 8-OHdG levels, and MDA levels were positively associated with HOMA index.
PFOS and PFDoDA exposures were positively associated with IR and oxidative stress, and vitamin C supplementation protected against the adverse effects of PFOS and PFDoDA on IR.
关于环境暴露于全氟化合物(PFCs)是否会影响胰岛素抵抗(IR)以及维生素C摄入是否能预防PFCs的不良影响,现有证据有限。本研究旨在通过氧化应激研究PFCs对IR的影响,以及与安慰剂相比,连续4周补充维生素C对PFCs所致IR发展的影响。
对于一项基于社区的维生素C双盲、随机、安慰剂对照交叉干预研究,我们将141名老年受试者分为维生素C组和安慰剂组,每组治疗4周。我们测量血清PFCs水平以评估PFCs暴露情况,测量尿丙二醛(MDA)和8-羟基-2'-脱氧鸟苷(8-OHdG)水平以评估氧化应激。我们还测量空腹血糖和胰岛素水平,并计算稳态模型评估(HOMA)指数以评估IR。
在基线和安慰剂治疗后,发现全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS)和全氟十二烷酸(PFDoDA)水平与HOMA指数呈正相关。与PFOS和PFDoDA暴露水平较低者相比,PFOS和PFDoDA暴露处于最高十分位数者的IR风险显著升高(均P<0.0001)。然而,补充维生素C后,PFOS和PFDoDA对HOMA的影响消失(均P>0.30)。此外,PFOS和PFDoDA水平也与MDA和8-OHdG水平显著相关,且MDA水平与HOMA指数呈正相关。
PFOS和PFDoDA暴露与IR和氧化应激呈正相关,补充维生素C可预防PFOS和PFDoDA对IR的不良影响。