• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

连胜中断模式下的投注决策:来自赌场游戏的证据。

Betting Decision Under Break-Streak Pattern: Evidence from Casino Gaming.

作者信息

Fong Lawrence Hoc Nang, So Amy Siu Ian, Law Rob

机构信息

Faculty of Business Administration, University of Macau, Avenida da Universidade, Taipa, Macau SAR, China.

School of Hotel and Tourism Management, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, 17 Science Museum Road, TST East, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.

出版信息

J Gambl Stud. 2016 Mar;32(1):171-85. doi: 10.1007/s10899-015-9550-1.

DOI:10.1007/s10899-015-9550-1
PMID:25967106
Abstract

Cognitive bias is prevalent among gamblers, especially those with gambling problems. Grounded in the heuristics theories, this study contributes to the literature by examining a cognitive bias triggered by the break streak pattern in the casino setting. We postulate that gamblers tend to bet on the latest outcome when there is a break-streak pattern. Moreover, three determinants of the betting decision under break-streak pattern, including the streak length of the alternative outcome, the frequency of the latest outcome, and gender, were identified and examined in this study. A non-participatory observational study was conducted among the Cussec gamblers in a casino in Macao. An analysis of 1229 bets confirms our postulation, particularly when the streak of the alternative outcome is long, the latest outcome is frequent, and the gamblers are females. The findings provide meaningful implications for casino management and public policymakers regarding the minimization of gambling harm.

摘要

认知偏差在赌徒中很普遍,尤其是那些有赌博问题的人。基于启发式理论,本研究通过考察赌场环境中连胜中断模式引发的认知偏差,为该文献做出了贡献。我们假设,当出现连胜中断模式时,赌徒倾向于押注最新结果。此外,本研究还确定并考察了连胜中断模式下投注决策的三个决定因素,包括替代结果的连胜长度、最新结果的频率和性别。在澳门一家赌场对参与赌博的顾客进行了一项非参与性观察研究。对1229次投注的分析证实了我们的假设,特别是当替代结果的连胜时间长、最新结果频繁且赌徒为女性时。这些发现为赌场管理和公共政策制定者在将赌博危害降至最低方面提供了有意义的启示。

相似文献

1
Betting Decision Under Break-Streak Pattern: Evidence from Casino Gaming.连胜中断模式下的投注决策:来自赌场游戏的证据。
J Gambl Stud. 2016 Mar;32(1):171-85. doi: 10.1007/s10899-015-9550-1.
2
Gambling Participation, Expenditure and Risk of Harm in Australia, 1997-1998 and 2010-2011.澳大利亚 1997-1998 年和 2010-2011 年的赌博参与度、支出和危害风险。
J Gambl Stud. 2018 Mar;34(1):255-274. doi: 10.1007/s10899-017-9708-0.
3
An examination of factors driving chinese gamblers' fallacy bias.考察导致中国赌徒谬误偏差的因素。
J Gambl Stud. 2014 Sep;30(3):757-70. doi: 10.1007/s10899-013-9390-9.
4
A Study of Adaptive Gambling Behavior of Casino Employees in Macau.澳门赌场员工的适应性赌博行为研究。
J Gambl Stud. 2021 Jun;37(2):351-367. doi: 10.1007/s10899-020-09934-5.
5
Near miss, gambler's fallacy and entrapment: their influence on lottery gamblers in Thailand.险些失误、赌徒谬误与陷阱:它们对泰国彩票玩家的影响。
J Gambl Stud. 2008 Sep;24(3):295-305. doi: 10.1007/s10899-008-9098-4. Epub 2008 May 30.
6
The Effects of Pop-up Harm Minimisation Messages on Electronic Gaming Machine Gambling Behaviour in New Zealand.弹出式危害最小化信息对新西兰电子游戏机赌博行为的影响。
J Gambl Stud. 2016 Dec;32(4):1115-1126. doi: 10.1007/s10899-016-9603-0.
7
Strategic and non-strategic problem gamblers differ on decision-making under risk and ambiguity.策略性和非策略性赌徒在风险和模糊情境下的决策存在差异。
Addiction. 2014 Jul;109(7):1128-37. doi: 10.1111/add.12494. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
8
The Utilisation of Music by Casino Managers: An Interview Study.赌场经理对音乐的运用:一项访谈研究。
J Gambl Stud. 2016 Dec;32(4):1127-1141. doi: 10.1007/s10899-016-9604-z.
9
Segmenting Chinese Gamblers Based on Gambling Forms: A Latent Class Analysis.基于赌博形式对中国赌徒进行细分:潜在类别分析。
J Gambl Stud. 2020 Mar;36(1):141-159. doi: 10.1007/s10899-019-09877-6.
10
Virtual addictions: An examination of problematic social casino game use among at-risk gamblers.虚拟成瘾:对高危赌徒中存在问题的社交赌场游戏使用情况的调查。
Addict Behav. 2017 Jan;64:334-339. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.12.007. Epub 2015 Dec 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Scent-driven Selective Attention on Gambling Outcome: Implications for Responsible Gambling.气味驱动的对赌博结果的选择性注意:对负责任赌博的启示。
J Gambl Stud. 2024 Dec;40(4):1823-1838. doi: 10.1007/s10899-024-10346-y. Epub 2024 Aug 10.

本文引用的文献

1
The prevalence of pathological gambling among college students: a meta-analytic synthesis, 2005-2013.2005 - 2013年大学生病理性赌博的患病率:一项元分析综述
J Gambl Stud. 2014 Dec;30(4):819-43. doi: 10.1007/s10899-013-9399-0.
2
An examination of factors driving chinese gamblers' fallacy bias.考察导致中国赌徒谬误偏差的因素。
J Gambl Stud. 2014 Sep;30(3):757-70. doi: 10.1007/s10899-013-9390-9.
3
Internet-based treatment of pathological gambling with a three-year follow-up.基于互联网的病理性赌博治疗,随访三年。
Cogn Behav Ther. 2012;41(4):321-34. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2012.689323. Epub 2012 May 24.
4
Cognitive distortions as a component and treatment focus of pathological gambling: a review.认知扭曲作为病理性赌博的一个组成部分和治疗重点:综述。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2012 Jun;26(2):298-310. doi: 10.1037/a0026422. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
5
A meta-analysis of pathological gaming prevalence and comorbidity with mental health, academic and social problems.病理性游戏患病率及其与心理健康、学业和社交问题共病的荟萃分析。
J Psychiatr Res. 2011 Dec;45(12):1573-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2011.09.005. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
6
The personality of pathological gamblers: a meta-analysis.病理性赌博者的人格特质:一项元分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2011 Aug;31(6):1057-67. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.02.002. Epub 2011 Feb 11.
7
Gambling-related cognitive biases and pathological gambling among youths, young adults, and mature adults in Chinese societies.赌博相关认知偏差与中国社会青少年、青年和成年人群体中的病理性赌博。
J Gambl Stud. 2012 Mar;28(1):139-54. doi: 10.1007/s10899-011-9249-x.
8
Responsible gambling: general principles and minimal requirements.负责任的赌博:一般原则和最低要求。
J Gambl Stud. 2011 Dec;27(4):565-73. doi: 10.1007/s10899-010-9214-0.
9
Demographic and social variables associated with problem gambling among men and women in Canada.加拿大男性和女性中与赌博问题相关的人口统计学和社会变量。
Psychiatry Res. 2010 Jul 30;178(2):395-400. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2009.10.003. Epub 2010 May 23.
10
Differences in cognitive distortions between pathological and non-pathological gamblers with preferences for chance or skill games.病理性赌博者和偏好机会或技巧游戏的非病理性赌博者在认知扭曲方面的差异。
J Gambl Stud. 2010 Dec;26(4):561-9. doi: 10.1007/s10899-010-9180-6.