• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

考察导致中国赌徒谬误偏差的因素。

An examination of factors driving chinese gamblers' fallacy bias.

机构信息

School of Hotel and Tourism Management, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, 17 Science Museum Road, TST East, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China,

出版信息

J Gambl Stud. 2014 Sep;30(3):757-70. doi: 10.1007/s10899-013-9390-9.

DOI:10.1007/s10899-013-9390-9
PMID:23740349
Abstract

Gambling is a leisure activity, which is enjoyed by many people around the world. Among these people, Chinese are known for their high propensity to gamble and are highly sought after by many casinos. In this exploratory study, the effect of two types of fallacy bias-positive recency and negative recency-on the betting behavior of Chinese gamblers is investigated. Although the influence of fallacy bias on a betting decision is well documented, little is known about the interaction of the factors that dictate fallacy bias. Drawing from an analysis of 2,645 betting decisions, the results show that Chinese gamblers primarily endorse positive recency, especially when the latest outcome is more frequent. This is contrary to most findings on Western subjects in which negative recency is more common. Current findings have meaningful implications to casino gaming entertainment businesses and public policymakers.

摘要

赌博是一种休闲活动,深受世界各地许多人的喜爱。在这些人中,中国人以其极高的赌博倾向而闻名,深受许多赌场的青睐。在这项探索性研究中,我们调查了两种谬误偏差——正近因偏差和负近因偏差——对中国赌徒的投注行为的影响。尽管谬误偏差对投注决策的影响已有充分的记录,但对于决定谬误偏差的因素之间的相互作用却知之甚少。通过对 2645 个投注决策的分析,结果表明,中国赌徒主要支持正近因偏差,尤其是当最新结果更频繁出现时。这与大多数针对西方受试者的研究结果相反,后者更常见的是负近因偏差。目前的研究结果对赌场娱乐业务和公共政策制定者具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
An examination of factors driving chinese gamblers' fallacy bias.考察导致中国赌徒谬误偏差的因素。
J Gambl Stud. 2014 Sep;30(3):757-70. doi: 10.1007/s10899-013-9390-9.
2
Betting Decision Under Break-Streak Pattern: Evidence from Casino Gaming.连胜中断模式下的投注决策:来自赌场游戏的证据。
J Gambl Stud. 2016 Mar;32(1):171-85. doi: 10.1007/s10899-015-9550-1.
3
Carry on winning: the gamblers' fallacy creates hot hand effects in online gambling.继续赢下去:赌徒谬误在网络赌博中产生了热手效应。
Cognition. 2014 May;131(2):173-80. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.01.002. Epub 2014 Feb 15.
4
Development of an Indigenous Inventory GMAB (Gambling Motives, Attitudes and Behaviors) for Chinese gamblers: an exploratory study.中文赌博者本土化赌博动机、态度和行为量表(GMAB)的编制:一项探索性研究。
J Gambl Stud. 2011 Mar;27(1):99-113. doi: 10.1007/s10899-010-9191-3.
5
The Dark Side of Authenticity: Feeling "Real" While Gambling Interacts with Enhancement Motives to Predict Problematic Gambling Behavior.真实性的阴暗面:赌博时感觉“真实”与增强动机相互作用,以预测问题赌博行为。
J Gambl Stud. 2015 Sep;31(3):995-1003. doi: 10.1007/s10899-014-9460-7.
6
The role of responsible gambling strategy and gambling passion in the online gamblers' decision-making process: revising the theory of planned behavior.负责任的赌博策略和赌博激情在网络赌徒决策过程中的作用:修订计划行为理论。
J Gambl Stud. 2014 Jun;30(2):403-22. doi: 10.1007/s10899-013-9359-8.
7
Segmenting Chinese Gamblers Based on Gambling Forms: A Latent Class Analysis.基于赌博形式对中国赌徒进行细分:潜在类别分析。
J Gambl Stud. 2020 Mar;36(1):141-159. doi: 10.1007/s10899-019-09877-6.
8
Gambling problems, risk factors, community knowledge, and impact in a US Lao immigrant and refugee community sample.美国老挝移民和难民社区样本中的赌博问题、风险因素、社区知识和影响。
Public Health. 2020 Jul;184:17-21. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.03.019. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
9
Virtual addictions: An examination of problematic social casino game use among at-risk gamblers.虚拟成瘾:对高危赌徒中存在问题的社交赌场游戏使用情况的调查。
Addict Behav. 2017 Jan;64:334-339. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.12.007. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
10
Strategic and non-strategic problem gamblers differ on decision-making under risk and ambiguity.策略性和非策略性赌徒在风险和模糊情境下的决策存在差异。
Addiction. 2014 Jul;109(7):1128-37. doi: 10.1111/add.12494. Epub 2014 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Stressful Life Events and Problem Gambling Among Chinese Lottery Gamblers: The Mediating Effects of Coping Strategies and Magical Thinking.中国彩票玩家的应激性生活事件与问题赌博:应对策略和迷信思维的中介作用
J Gambl Stud. 2024 Jun;40(2):1-18. doi: 10.1007/s10899-023-10270-7. Epub 2023 Dec 8.
2
Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Gamblers of East Asian Descent in Australia: A Comprehensive Review of Current Evidence.澳大利亚东亚裔文化和语言多样化的赌徒:当前证据的综合回顾。
J Gambl Stud. 2023 Jun;39(2):947-969. doi: 10.1007/s10899-023-10202-5. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
3
Gambling along the schizotypal spectrum: The associations between schizotypal personality, gambling-related cognitions, luck, and problem gambling.

本文引用的文献

1
Born to choose: the origins and value of the need for control.天生选择:控制欲的起源和价值。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Oct;14(10):457-63. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.08.001.
2
The Origin of Cultural Differences in Cognition: Evidence for the Social Orientation Hypothesis.认知中文化差异的起源:社会取向假说的证据。
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2010;19(1):9-13. doi: 10.1177/0963721409359301.
3
Cultural difference in neural mechanisms of self-recognition.自我识别神经机制中的文化差异。
分裂型人格特质范围内的赌博行为:分裂型人格、与赌博相关的认知、运气和问题赌博之间的关联
J Behav Addict. 2022 May 19;11(2):406-16. doi: 10.1556/2006.2022.00021.
4
Pathological Gambling, Gambling Disorder, and Problem Gambling Among the Chinese Ethnic Population Living in Western Countries: Is Culture a Sufficient Explanation for the Reported Excess Rates?西方国家的华裔族群中的病态赌博、赌博障碍和问题赌博:文化是否足以解释报告中的高发率?
J Gambl Stud. 2021 Sep;37(3):927-945. doi: 10.1007/s10899-021-10012-7. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
5
Culture and gambling fallacies.文化与赌博谬误。
Springerplus. 2015 Sep 17;4:510. doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1290-2. eCollection 2015.
6
Betting Decision Under Break-Streak Pattern: Evidence from Casino Gaming.连胜中断模式下的投注决策:来自赌场游戏的证据。
J Gambl Stud. 2016 Mar;32(1):171-85. doi: 10.1007/s10899-015-9550-1.
7
Gender Differences in Risk Aversion Among Chinese University Students.中国大学生风险规避中的性别差异
J Gambl Stud. 2015 Dec;31(4):1405-15. doi: 10.1007/s10899-014-9492-z.
Soc Neurosci. 2009;4(5):402-11. doi: 10.1080/17470910802674825.
4
What's next? Judging sequences of binary events.接下来是什么?判断二元事件的序列。
Psychol Bull. 2009 Mar;135(2):262-85. doi: 10.1037/a0014821.
5
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.《不确定性下的判断:启发式与偏差》
Science. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1124-31. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
6
Cultural differences in neural function associated with object processing.与物体加工相关的神经功能中的文化差异。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2006 Jun;6(2):102-9. doi: 10.3758/cabn.6.2.102.
7
Sex differences in cognitive abilities test scores: a UK national picture.认知能力测试分数中的性别差异:一幅英国全国性图景。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2006 Sep;76(Pt 3):463-80. doi: 10.1348/000709905X50906.
8
The hot hand fallacy and the gambler's fallacy: two faces of subjective randomness?热手谬误与赌徒谬误:主观随机性的两面?
Mem Cognit. 2004 Dec;32(8):1369-78. doi: 10.3758/bf03206327.
9
Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A meta-analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self-serving attributional bias.归因中是否存在普遍的积极偏差?对自我服务归因偏差中个体、发展和文化差异的元分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2004 Sep;130(5):711-47. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.711.
10
Randomness and inductions from streaks: "gambler's fallacy" versus "hot hand".随机性与连胜现象的归纳:“赌徒谬误”与“热手效应”
Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Feb;11(1):179-84. doi: 10.3758/bf03206480.