Im Maesoon, Fried Shelley I
Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, 150 South Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02130, USA.
Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 50 Blossom Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
J Physiol. 2015 Aug 15;593(16):3577-96. doi: 10.1113/JP270606. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
To improve the quality of vision elicited by retinal prosthetics, elicited neural activity should resemble physiological signalling patterns; here, we hypothesized that electric stimulation that activates the synaptic circuitry of the retina would lead to closer matches than that which activates ganglion cells directly. We evaluated this hypothesis by comparing light and electrical responses in different types of ganglion cells. In contrast to the similarity in their light responses, electrical responses in ON and OFF cells of the same type were quite distinct. Further, electrical and light responses in the same cell were much better correlated in ON vs. OFF ganglion cells. Stimuli that activated photoreceptors yielded better correlations than those which activated bipolar cells. Our results suggest that the closer match to physiology in the ON signal transmitted to the brain may help to explain preferential reports of 'bright' phosphenes during earlier clinical trials.
To improve the efficacy of microelectronic retinal prosthetics it will be necessary to better understand the response of retinal neurons to electric stimulation. While stimulation that directly activates ganglion cells generally has the lowest threshold, the similarity in responsiveness across cells makes it extremely difficult for such an approach to re-create cell-type specific patterns of neural activity that arise normally in the healthy retina. In contrast, stimulation that activates neurons presynaptic to ganglion cells utilizes at least some of the existing retinal circuitry and therefore is thought to produce neural activity that better matches physiological signalling. Surprisingly, the actual benefit(s) of this approach remain unsubstantiated. Here, we recorded from ganglion cells in the rabbit retinal explant in response to electrical stimuli that activated the network. Targeted cells were first classified into known types via light responses so that the consistency of electrical responses within individual types could be evaluated. Both transient and sustained ON ganglion cells exhibited highly consistent electrical response patterns which were distinct from one another. Further, properties of the response (interspike interval, latency, peak firing rate, and spike count) in a given cell were well correlated to the corresponding properties of the light response for that same cell. Electric responses in OFF ganglion cells formed two groups, distinct from ON groups, and the correlation levels between electric and light responses were much weaker. The closer match in ON pathway responses may help to explain some preferential reporting of bright stimuli during psychophysical testing.
为提高视网膜假体引发的视觉质量,引发的神经活动应类似于生理信号模式;在此,我们假设激活视网膜突触回路的电刺激比直接激活神经节细胞的电刺激能产生更接近的匹配。我们通过比较不同类型神经节细胞的光反应和电反应来评估这一假设。与它们的光反应相似性不同,同一类型的开(ON)细胞和关(OFF)细胞的电反应相当不同。此外,同一细胞的电反应和光反应在开神经节细胞与关神经节细胞中相关性更好。激活光感受器的刺激比激活双极细胞的刺激产生的相关性更好。我们的结果表明,传递到大脑的开信号中与生理更接近的匹配可能有助于解释早期临床试验中对“明亮”光幻视的优先报告。
为提高微电子视网膜假体的功效,有必要更好地了解视网膜神经元对电刺激的反应。虽然直接激活神经节细胞的刺激通常阈值最低,但细胞间反应的相似性使得这种方法极难重现健康视网膜中正常出现的细胞类型特异性神经活动模式。相比之下,激活神经节细胞突触前神经元的刺激利用了至少部分现有的视网膜回路,因此被认为能产生更符合生理信号的神经活动。令人惊讶的是,这种方法的实际益处仍未得到证实。在此,我们记录了兔视网膜外植体中神经节细胞对激活网络的电刺激的反应。首先通过光反应将靶向细胞分类为已知类型,以便评估各类型内电反应的一致性。瞬态和持续的开神经节细胞均表现出高度一致的电反应模式,且彼此不同。此外,给定细胞的反应特性(峰峰间隔、潜伏期、峰值放电率和放电计数)与该细胞光反应的相应特性密切相关。关神经节细胞的电反应形成两组,与开神经节细胞组不同,电反应和光反应之间的相关水平要弱得多。开通路反应中更接近的匹配可能有助于解释心理物理学测试中对明亮刺激的一些优先报告。