Shonnard David R, Klemetsrud Bethany, Sacramento-Rivero Julio, Navarro-Pineda Freddy, Hilbert Jorge, Handler Robert, Suppen Nydia, Donovan Richard P
Department of Chemical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA.
Sustainable Futures Institute, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA.
Environ Manage. 2015 Dec;56(6):1356-76. doi: 10.1007/s00267-015-0543-8. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
Life-cycle assessment (LCA) has been applied to many biofuel and bioenergy systems to determine potential environmental impacts, but the conclusions have varied. Different methodologies and processes for conducting LCA of biofuels make the results difficult to compare, in-turn making it difficult to make the best possible and informed decision. Of particular importance are the wide variability in country-specific conditions, modeling assumptions, data quality, chosen impact categories and indicators, scale of production, system boundaries, and co-product allocation. This study has a double purpose: conducting a critical evaluation comparing environmental LCA of biofuels from several conversion pathways and in several countries in the Pan American region using both qualitative and quantitative analyses, and making recommendations for harmonization with respect to biofuel LCA study features, such as study assumptions, inventory data, impact indicators, and reporting practices. The environmental management implications are discussed within the context of different national and international regulatory environments using a case study. The results from this study highlight LCA methodology choices that cause high variability in results and limit comparability among different studies, even among the same biofuel pathway, and recommendations are provided for improvement.
生命周期评估(LCA)已应用于许多生物燃料和生物能源系统,以确定潜在的环境影响,但结论各不相同。用于生物燃料生命周期评估的不同方法和流程使得结果难以比较,进而难以做出尽可能最佳且明智的决策。特别重要的是,各国具体情况、建模假设、数据质量、选定的影响类别和指标、生产规模、系统边界以及副产品分配存在很大差异。本研究有双重目的:使用定性和定量分析方法,对泛美地区几个国家几种转化途径的生物燃料的环境生命周期评估进行批判性评价,并就生物燃料生命周期评估研究特征(如研究假设、清单数据、影响指标和报告做法)的协调提出建议。通过一个案例研究,在不同国家和国际监管环境的背景下讨论环境管理影响。本研究结果突出了导致结果高度可变且限制不同研究(甚至同一生物燃料途径的研究)之间可比性的生命周期评估方法选择,并提供了改进建议。