• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Treatment decisions based on scalar and functional baseline covariates.基于标量和功能基线协变量的治疗决策。
Biometrics. 2015 Dec;71(4):884-94. doi: 10.1111/biom.12346. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
2
Estimation and evaluation of linear individualized treatment rules to guarantee performance.线性个体化治疗规则的估计与评估以确保疗效。
Biometrics. 2018 Jun;74(2):517-528. doi: 10.1111/biom.12773. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
3
Prediction of treatment outcomes in major depressive disorder.重度抑郁症治疗结果的预测
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2015;8(6):669-72. doi: 10.1586/17512433.2015.1075390. Epub 2015 Aug 2.
4
Detecting treatment-covariate interactions using permutation methods.使用置换法检测治疗协变量相互作用。
Stat Med. 2015 May 30;34(12):2035-47. doi: 10.1002/sim.6457. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
5
Personalized Medicine: Review and Perspectives of Promising Baseline EEG Biomarkers in Major Depressive Disorder and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.个性化医疗:重度抑郁症和注意力缺陷多动障碍中有前景的基线脑电图生物标志物综述与展望
Neuropsychobiology. 2015;72(3-4):229-40. doi: 10.1159/000437435. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
6
Adaptive contrast weighted learning for multi-stage multi-treatment decision-making.用于多阶段多治疗决策的自适应对比度加权学习
Biometrics. 2017 Mar;73(1):145-155. doi: 10.1111/biom.12539. Epub 2016 May 23.
7
Using decision lists to construct interpretable and parsimonious treatment regimes.使用决策列表构建可解释且简洁的治疗方案。
Biometrics. 2015 Dec;71(4):895-904. doi: 10.1111/biom.12354. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
8
Constructing treatment decision rules based on scalar and functional predictors when moderators of treatment effect are unknown.当治疗效果的调节因素未知时,基于标量和功能预测因子构建治疗决策规则。
J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat. 2018 Nov;67(5):1331-1356. doi: 10.1111/rssc.12278. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
9
Inference for optimal dynamic treatment regimes using an adaptive m-out-of-n bootstrap scheme.使用自适应n选m自助法对最优动态治疗方案进行推断。
Biometrics. 2013 Sep;69(3):714-23. doi: 10.1111/biom.12052. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
10
Testing interaction between treatment and high-dimensional covariates in randomized clinical trials.在随机临床试验中检验治疗与高维协变量之间的相互作用。
Biom J. 2017 Jul;59(4):672-684. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201500194. Epub 2016 Oct 20.

引用本文的文献

1
A Single Index Model for Longitudinal Outcomes to Optimize Individual Treatment Decision Rules.一种用于纵向结果以优化个体治疗决策规则的单指标模型。
Stat. 2022 Dec;11(1). doi: 10.1002/sta4.493. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
2
Functional additive models for optimizing individualized treatment rules.功能添加剂模型用于优化个体化治疗规则。
Biometrics. 2023 Mar;79(1):113-126. doi: 10.1111/biom.13586. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
3
Bayesian Nonparametric Policy Search with Application to Periodontal Recall Intervals.贝叶斯非参数策略搜索及其在牙周复查间隔中的应用
J Am Stat Assoc. 2020;115(531):1066-1078. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2019.1660169. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
4
A sparse additive model for treatment effect-modifier selection.稀疏加法模型用于治疗效果修饰符选择。
Biostatistics. 2022 Apr 13;23(2):412-429. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxaa032.
5
Optimising treatment decision rules through generated effect modifiers: a precision medicine tutorial.通过生成效应修饰符优化治疗决策规则:精准医学教程
BJPsych Open. 2019 Dec 3;6(1):e2. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2019.85.
6
Constructing treatment decision rules based on scalar and functional predictors when moderators of treatment effect are unknown.当治疗效果的调节因素未知时,基于标量和功能预测因子构建治疗决策规则。
J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat. 2018 Nov;67(5):1331-1356. doi: 10.1111/rssc.12278. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
7
Functional feature construction for individualized treatment regimes.个性化治疗方案的功能特征构建
J Am Stat Assoc. 2017;113(523):1219-1227. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2017.1321545. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
8
LATENT CLASS MODELING USING MATRIX COVARIATES WITH APPLICATION TO IDENTIFYING EARLY PLACEBO RESPONDERS BASED ON EEG SIGNALS.使用矩阵协变量的潜在类别建模及其在基于脑电图信号识别早期安慰剂反应者中的应用
Ann Appl Stat. 2017 Sep;11(3):1513-1536. doi: 10.1214/17-AOAS1044. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
9
Flexible functional regression methods for estimating individualized treatment regimes.用于估计个体化治疗方案的灵活功能回归方法。
Stat (Int Stat Inst). 2016;5(1):185-199. doi: 10.1002/sta4.114. Epub 2016 May 31.
10
Statistical Analysis Plan for Stage 1 EMBARC (Establishing Moderators and Biosignatures of Antidepressant Response for Clinical Care) Study.第一阶段EMBARC(建立用于临床护理的抗抑郁反应调节因子和生物标志物)研究的统计分析计划。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2017 Jun;6:22-30. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2017.02.007. Epub 2017 Feb 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Q- and A-learning Methods for Estimating Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes.用于估计最优动态治疗方案的问答学习方法。
Stat Sci. 2014 Nov;29(4):640-661. doi: 10.1214/13-STS450.
2
Dynamic treatment regimes: technical challenges and applications.动态治疗方案:技术挑战与应用
Electron J Stat. 2014;8(1):1225-1272. doi: 10.1214/14-ejs920.
3
Estimation of treatment policies based on functional predictors.基于功能预测器的治疗策略估计
Stat Sin. 2014 Jul;24(3):1461-1485. doi: 10.5705/ss.2012.196.
4
Toward a neuroimaging treatment selection biomarker for major depressive disorder.针对重度抑郁症的神经影像学治疗选择生物标志物。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2013 Aug;70(8):821-9. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.143.
5
Estimating Individualized Treatment Rules Using Outcome Weighted Learning.使用结果加权学习估计个体化治疗规则。
J Am Stat Assoc. 2012 Sep 1;107(449):1106-1118. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2012.695674.
6
A robust method for estimating optimal treatment regimes.一种估计最优治疗方案的稳健方法。
Biometrics. 2012 Dec;68(4):1010-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2012.01763.x. Epub 2012 May 2.
7
Penalized Functional Regression.惩罚性函数回归
J Comput Graph Stat. 2011 Dec 1;20(4):830-851. doi: 10.1198/jcgs.2010.10007.
8
Variable selection for optimal treatment decision.变量选择以实现最佳治疗决策。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2013 Oct;22(5):493-504. doi: 10.1177/0962280211428383. Epub 2011 Nov 23.
9
PERFORMANCE GUARANTEES FOR INDIVIDUALIZED TREATMENT RULES.个性化治疗规则的性能保证
Ann Stat. 2011 Apr 1;39(2):1180-1210. doi: 10.1214/10-AOS864.
10
Current source density measures of electroencephalographic alpha predict antidepressant treatment response.脑电图 alpha 电流密度测量预测抗抑郁治疗反应。
Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Aug 15;70(4):388-94. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.02.016. Epub 2011 Apr 20.

基于标量和功能基线协变量的治疗决策。

Treatment decisions based on scalar and functional baseline covariates.

作者信息

Ciarleglio Adam, Petkova Eva, Ogden R Todd, Tarpey Thaddeus

机构信息

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, New York University, New York, NY 10016, U.S.A.

Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY 10962, U.S.A.

出版信息

Biometrics. 2015 Dec;71(4):884-94. doi: 10.1111/biom.12346. Epub 2015 Jun 25.

DOI:10.1111/biom.12346
PMID:26111145
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4691227/
Abstract

The amount and complexity of patient-level data being collected in randomized-controlled trials offer both opportunities and challenges for developing personalized rules for assigning treatment for a given disease or ailment. For example, trials examining treatments for major depressive disorder are not only collecting typical baseline data such as age, gender, or scores on various tests, but also data that measure the structure and function of the brain such as images from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), functional MRI (fMRI), or electroencephalography (EEG). These latter types of data have an inherent structure and may be considered as functional data. We propose an approach that uses baseline covariates, both scalars and functions, to aid in the selection of an optimal treatment. In addition to providing information on which treatment should be selected for a new patient, the estimated regime has the potential to provide insight into the relationship between treatment response and the set of baseline covariates. Our approach can be viewed as an extension of "advantage learning" to include both scalar and functional covariates. We describe our method and how to implement it using existing software. Empirical performance of our method is evaluated with simulated data in a variety of settings and also applied to data arising from a study of patients with major depressive disorder from whom baseline scalar covariates as well as functional data from EEG are available.

摘要

在随机对照试验中收集的患者层面数据的数量和复杂性,为制定针对特定疾病或病症的个性化治疗分配规则带来了机遇和挑战。例如,针对重度抑郁症治疗的试验不仅收集诸如年龄、性别或各种测试分数等典型基线数据,还收集测量大脑结构和功能的数据,如磁共振成像(MRI)、功能磁共振成像(fMRI)或脑电图(EEG)的图像。后一类数据具有内在结构,可被视为功能数据。我们提出一种方法,该方法使用基线协变量(包括标量和函数)来辅助选择最佳治疗方案。除了提供关于应为新患者选择何种治疗的信息外,估计的治疗方案还有可能深入了解治疗反应与基线协变量集之间的关系。我们的方法可被视为“优势学习”的扩展,以纳入标量和功能协变量。我们描述了我们的方法以及如何使用现有软件来实现它。我们用各种设置下的模拟数据评估了我们方法的实证性能,并将其应用于来自一项针对重度抑郁症患者的研究的数据,这些患者既有基线标量协变量,又有来自脑电图的功能数据。