Moxham Bernard, McHanwell Stephen, Plaisant Odile, Pais Diogo
Cardiff School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Museum Avenue, Cardiff CF10 3AX, Wales, United Kingdom.
Department of Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, St. George's University, True Blue, Grenada, West Indies.
Clin Anat. 2015 Sep;28(6):706-16. doi: 10.1002/ca.22577. Epub 2015 Jun 28.
There is increasingly a call for clinical relevance in the teaching of biomedical sciences within all health care courses. However, this presupposes that there is a clear understanding of what can be considered core material within the curricula. To date, the anatomical sciences have been relatively poorly served by the development of core syllabuses, particularly for specialized core syllabuses such as neuroanatomy. One of the aims of the International Federation of Associations of Anatomists (IFAA) and of the European Federation for Experimental Morphology (EFEM) is to formulate, on an international scale, core syllabuses for all branches of the anatomical sciences using Delphi Panels consisting of anatomists, scientists, and clinicians to initially evaluate syllabus content. In this article, the findings of a Delphi Panel for neuroanatomy are provided. These findings will subsequently be published on the IFAA website to enable anatomical (and other cognate learned) societies and individual anatomists, clinicians, and students to freely comment upon, and elaborate and amend, the syllabuses. The aim is to set internationally recognized standards and thus to provide guidelines concerning neuroanatomical knowledge when engaged in course development.
在所有医疗保健课程的生物医学科学教学中,对临床相关性的呼声越来越高。然而,这预先假定了对课程中哪些内容可被视为核心材料有清晰的理解。迄今为止,核心教学大纲的制定相对未能很好地服务于解剖学学科,尤其是对于像神经解剖学这样的专业核心教学大纲。国际解剖学家协会联合会(IFAA)和欧洲实验形态学联合会(EFEM)的目标之一是在国际范围内,利用由解剖学家、科学家和临床医生组成的德尔菲小组来初步评估教学大纲内容,为解剖学各分支制定核心教学大纲。本文提供了一个神经解剖学德尔菲小组的结果。这些结果随后将在IFAA网站上公布,以使解剖学(及其他相关学术)学会以及个体解剖学家、临床医生和学生能够自由评论、阐述和修改这些教学大纲。目的是设定国际认可的标准,从而在进行课程开发时提供有关神经解剖学知识的指导方针。