Khalid Rizvan, Knowles Toby G, Wotton Steve B
Euro Quality Lambs Ltd, Euro House, Dale Street, Craven Arms, Shropshire SY7 9PA, UK.
University of Bristol, School of Veterinary Sciences, Langford, Bristol BS40 5DU, UK.
Meat Sci. 2015 Dec;110:15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.06.008. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
Blood lost at exsanguination during the Halal slaughter of lambs was compared between the slaughter methods of Traditional Religious Slaughter without stunning (TRS), Electric Head-Only Stunning (EHOS) and Post-Cut Electric Head-Only Stunning (PCEHOS). Two protocols were examined, Experimental (80 lambs) and Commercial (360 lambs), assessing varying periods of animal orientation during the 4 min bleeding process (upright orientation before vertical hanging). Live-weight, blood weight (Experimental only), carcass weights and by-product weights were recorded. The Experimental protocol highlighted an increase in blood loss at 60s in EHOS and PCEHOS compared to TRS (P<0.001) but by 90 s there was no significant difference. A post-slaughter change in animal orientation from an upright to a vertical hanging position aided the amount of blood loss. The bleeding of lambs is largely completed by 2 min. There were no significant differences (P>0.05) in final blood loss between treatments. This research was undertaken to inform discussion on the merits of different slaughter methods compatible with Halal requirements.
在对羊羔进行清真屠宰时,比较了传统宗教无电击致晕屠宰法(TRS)、头部电击致晕法(EHOS)和宰后头部电击致晕法(PCEHOS)三种屠宰方式下的放血失血量。研究了两个方案,即实验方案(80只羊羔)和商业方案(360只羊羔),评估了在4分钟放血过程中(垂直悬挂前的直立姿势)不同的动物姿势持续时间。记录了活重、血重(仅实验方案)、胴体重和副产品重量。实验方案显示,与TRS相比,EHOS和PCEHOS在60秒时的失血量增加(P<0.001),但到90秒时,差异不显著。屠宰后动物姿势从直立变为垂直悬挂有助于增加失血量。羊羔的放血在2分钟时基本完成。各处理之间的最终失血量无显著差异(P>0.05)。进行这项研究是为了为关于符合清真要求的不同屠宰方法的优点的讨论提供信息。