Aghwan Z A, Bello A U, Abubakar A A, Imlan J C, Sazili A Q
Halal Products Research Institute, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400, UPM Serdang, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia; Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq.
Laboratory of Animal Production, Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400, UPM Serdang, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia; University Farm Research, Yobe State University, Damaturu, Nigeria.
Meat Sci. 2016 Nov;121:420-428. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.06.028. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
Traditional halal slaughter and other forms of religious slaughter are still an issue of debate. Opposing arguments related to pre-slaughter handling, stress and pain associated with restraint, whether the incision is painful or not, and the onset of unconsciousness have been put forward, but no consensus has been achieved. There is a need to strike a balance between halal bleeding in the light of science and animal welfare. There is a paucity of scientific data with respect to animal welfare, particularly the use of restraining devices, animal handling, and efficient halal bleeding. However, this review found that competent handling of animals, proper use of restraining devices, and the efficient bleeding process that follows halal slaughter maintains meat eating quality. In conclusion, halal bleeding, when carried out in accordance with recommended animal welfare procedures, will not only maintain the quality and wholesomeness of meat but could also potentially reduce suffering and pain. Maintained meat quality increases consumer satisfaction and food safety.
传统的清真屠宰及其他形式的宗教屠宰仍是一个存在争议的问题。关于屠宰前处理、与束缚相关的应激和疼痛、切口是否疼痛以及失去意识的起始等方面,已经有人提出了反对观点,但尚未达成共识。有必要在依据科学的清真放血与动物福利之间取得平衡。关于动物福利,尤其是束缚装置的使用、动物处理以及高效的清真放血,科学数据匮乏。然而,本综述发现,对动物的妥善处理、束缚装置的正确使用以及清真屠宰后的高效放血过程能够保持肉的食用品质。总之,按照推荐的动物福利程序进行清真放血,不仅能保持肉的品质和卫生,还可能减少痛苦。保持肉的品质能提高消费者满意度和食品安全。