Hashimoto Naomi, Thompson Cynthia K
Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Aphasiology. 2010;24(5):580-611. doi: 10.1080/02687030902777567.
Although naming deficits are well documented in aphasia, on-line measures of naming processes have been little investigated. The use of on-line measures may offer further insight into the nature of aphasic naming deficits that would otherwise be difficult to interpret when using off-line measures.
The temporal activation of semantic and phonological processes was tracked in older normal control and aphasic individuals using a picture-word interference paradigm. The purpose of the study was to examine how word interference results can augment and/or corroborate standard language testing in the aphasic group, as well as to examine temporal patterns of activation in the aphasic group when compared to a normal control group.
METHODS & PROCEDURES: A total of 20 older normal individuals and 11 aphasic individuals participated. Detailed measures of each aphasic individual's language and naming skills were obtained. A visual picture-word interference paradigm was used in which the words bore either a semantic, phonological, or no relationship to 25 pictures. These competitor words were presented at stimulus onset asynchronies of -300 ms, +300 ms, and 0 ms.
OUTCOMES & RESULTS: Analyses of naming RTs in both groups revealed significant early semantic interference effects, mid-semantic interference effects, and mid-phonological facilitation effects. A matched control-aphasic group comparison revealed no differences in the temporal activation of effects during the course of naming. Partial support for this RT pattern was found in the aphasic naming error pattern. The aphasic group also demonstrated greater SIEs and PFEs compared to the matched control group, which indicated disruptions of the phonological processing stage. Analyses of behavioural performances of the aphasic group corroborated this finding.
The aphasic naming RTs results were unexpected given the results from the priming literature, which has supported the idea of slowed or reduced patterns of activation in aphasic individuals. However, analyses of naming RTs also confirmed the behavioural finding of a disruption surrounding phonological processes; thus, the analyses of naming latencies offers another potential means of pinpointing breakdowns of lexical access in individuals with aphasia.
尽管失语症中的命名缺陷已有充分记录,但对命名过程的在线测量研究较少。使用在线测量可能会进一步深入了解失语症命名缺陷的本质,而这在使用离线测量时难以解释。
使用图片-单词干扰范式,追踪老年正常对照组和失语症患者语义和语音过程的时间激活情况。本研究的目的是检验单词干扰结果如何增强和/或证实失语症组的标准语言测试,以及与正常对照组相比,失语症组的激活时间模式。
共有20名老年正常个体和11名失语症个体参与。获得了每位失语症个体语言和命名技能的详细测量数据。使用视觉图片-单词干扰范式,其中单词与25张图片具有语义、语音或无关系。这些竞争单词在刺激起始异步时间为-300毫秒、+300毫秒和0毫秒时呈现。
两组命名反应时的分析显示出显著的早期语义干扰效应、中期语义干扰效应和中期语音促进效应。匹配的对照组与失语症组比较显示,在命名过程中效应的时间激活没有差异。在失语症命名错误模式中发现了对这种反应时模式的部分支持。与匹配的对照组相比,失语症组还表现出更大的语义干扰效应和语音促进效应,这表明语音处理阶段受到干扰。对失语症组行为表现的分析证实了这一发现。
鉴于启动文献的结果,失语症命名反应时的结果出乎意料,该文献支持失语症个体激活模式减慢或减少的观点。然而,命名反应时的分析也证实了围绕语音过程干扰的行为发现;因此,对命名潜伏期的分析提供了另一种潜在方法,用于确定失语症个体词汇通达的故障点。