• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨组织层级的流言效用:多层次选择、搭便车者与团队

Utilities of gossip across organizational levels : Multilevel selection, free-riders, and teams.

作者信息

Kniffin Kevin M, Wilson David Sloan

机构信息

Department of Anthropology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1180 Observatory Drive, 5240 Social Science Building, 53706, Madison, WI.

State University of New York, Binghamton.

出版信息

Hum Nat. 2005 Sep;16(3):278-92. doi: 10.1007/s12110-005-1011-6.

DOI:10.1007/s12110-005-1011-6
PMID:26189751
Abstract

Gossip is a subject that has been studied by researchers from an array of disciplines with various foci and methods. We measured the content of language use by members of a competitive sports team across 18 months, integrating qualitative ethnographic methods with quantitative sampling and analysis. We hypothesized that the use of gossip will vary significantly depending on whether it is used for self-serving or group-serving purposes. Our results support a model of gossip derived from multilevel selection theory that expects gossip to serve group-beneficial rules when rewards are partitioned at the group level on a scale that permits mutual monitoring. We integrate our case study with earlier studies of gossip conducted by anthropologists, psychologists, and management researchers.

摘要

八卦是一个受到来自一系列学科、有着不同重点和方法的研究人员研究的课题。我们对一支竞技运动队的成员在18个月内的语言使用内容进行了测量,将定性的人种学方法与定量抽样和分析相结合。我们假设,八卦的使用会因它是用于利己目的还是利于群体目的而有显著差异。我们的研究结果支持了一个源自多层次选择理论的八卦模型,该模型预计,当奖励在群体层面按允许相互监督的规模进行分配时,八卦将服务于对群体有益的规则。我们将我们的案例研究与人类学家、心理学家和管理研究人员早期对八卦的研究进行了整合。

相似文献

1
Utilities of gossip across organizational levels : Multilevel selection, free-riders, and teams.跨组织层级的流言效用:多层次选择、搭便车者与团队
Hum Nat. 2005 Sep;16(3):278-92. doi: 10.1007/s12110-005-1011-6.
2
Are gossipers looked down upon? A norm-based perspective on the relation between gossip and gossiper status.爱说闲话的人会被看不起吗?基于规范的视角看待闲话和说闲话者地位之间的关系。
J Appl Psychol. 2023 Jun;108(6):905-933. doi: 10.1037/apl0001056. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
3
Moving beyond assumptions of deviance: The reconceptualization and measurement of workplace gossip.超越偏差假设:职场八卦的重新概念化和测量。
J Appl Psychol. 2017 Jan;102(1):1-25. doi: 10.1037/apl0000164. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
4
An attributional process model of workplace gossip.工作场所流言蜚语的归因过程模型。
J Appl Psychol. 2021 Feb;106(2):300-316. doi: 10.1037/apl0000504. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
5
Negative Gossip Decreases Targets' Organizational Citizenship Behavior by Decreasing Social Inclusion. A Multi-Method Approach.负面八卦通过减少社会包容来降低目标对象的组织公民行为。一种多方法研究途径。
Group Organ Manag. 2021 Jun;46(3):463-497. doi: 10.1177/1059601120986876. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
6
Silence Is Golden. Six Reasons Inhibiting the Spread of Third-Party Gossip.沉默是金。抑制第三方流言传播的六个原因。
Front Psychol. 2019 May 13;10:1120. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01120. eCollection 2019.
7
Being in the Know : Social Network Analysis of Gossip and Friendship on a College Campus.知情者:大学校园八卦和友谊的社会网络分析。
Hum Nat. 2021 Sep;32(3):603-621. doi: 10.1007/s12110-021-09409-5. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
8
Capturing Workplace Gossip as Dynamic Conversational Events: First Insights From Care Team Meetings.将职场八卦作为动态对话事件进行捕捉:护理团队会议的初步见解
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 12;12:725720. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.725720. eCollection 2021.
9
Competitive gossip: the impact of domain, resource value, resource scarcity and coalitions.竞争八卦:领域、资源价值、资源稀缺性和联盟的影响。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;376(1838):20200305. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0305. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
10
Gossip and emotion in nursing and health-care organizations.护理与医疗保健机构中的流言蜚语与情绪
J Health Organ Manag. 2005;19(4-5):378-94. doi: 10.1108/14777260510615404.

引用本文的文献

1
A Qualitative Study of Workplace Gossip in the Residency Learning Environment.住院医师学习环境中职场八卦的定性研究
J Grad Med Educ. 2024 Dec;16(6):684-690. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-24-00153.1. Epub 2024 Dec 13.
2
Brokering or Sitting Between Two Chairs? A Group Perspective on Workplace Gossip.充当中间人还是两面不讨好?关于职场流言蜚语的群体视角
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 8;13:815383. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.815383. eCollection 2022.
3
Four Puzzles of Reputation-Based Cooperation : Content, Process, Honesty, and Structure.基于声誉的合作的四个谜题:内容、过程、诚实和结构。

本文引用的文献

1
Human conversational behavior.人类对话行为。
Hum Nat. 1997 Sep;8(3):231-46. doi: 10.1007/BF02912493.
2
Multilevel selection, cooperation, and altruism : Reflections on unto others: The evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior.多层次选择、合作与利他主义:关于《施惠于他人:无私行为的进化与心理》的思考
Hum Nat. 1999 Sep;10(3):311-27. doi: 10.1007/s12110-999-1006-9.
3
Multilevel selection and the social transmission of behavior.多层次选择与行为的社会传播
Hum Nat. 2022 Mar;33(1):43-61. doi: 10.1007/s12110-021-09419-3. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
4
Negative Gossip Decreases Targets' Organizational Citizenship Behavior by Decreasing Social Inclusion. A Multi-Method Approach.负面八卦通过减少社会包容来降低目标对象的组织公民行为。一种多方法研究途径。
Group Organ Manag. 2021 Jun;46(3):463-497. doi: 10.1177/1059601120986876. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
5
Work-to-Family Spillover Effects of Workplace Negative Gossip: A Mediated Moderation Model.职场负面八卦的工作-家庭溢出效应:一个中介调节模型
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 22;11:1612. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01612. eCollection 2020.
6
The Bright and Dark Side of Gossip for Cooperation in Groups.群体合作中八卦的正反两面
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 20;10:1374. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01374. eCollection 2019.
7
Silence Is Golden. Six Reasons Inhibiting the Spread of Third-Party Gossip.沉默是金。抑制第三方流言传播的六个原因。
Front Psychol. 2019 May 13;10:1120. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01120. eCollection 2019.
8
Effect of Perceived Negative Workplace Gossip on Employees' Behaviors.感知到的负面职场流言蜚语对员工行为的影响。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 12;9:1112. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01112. eCollection 2018.
9
Hypocrisy and Corruption: How Disparities in Power Shape the Evolution of Social Control.虚伪与腐败:权力差异如何塑造社会控制的演变
Evol Psychol. 2018 Apr-Jun;16(2):1474704918756993. doi: 10.1177/1474704918756993.
10
Toward a Natural History of Team Sports.走向团队运动的自然史。
Hum Nat. 2018 Sep;29(3):211-218. doi: 10.1007/s12110-018-9322-6.
Hum Nat. 1999 Sep;10(3):291-310. doi: 10.1007/s12110-999-1005-x.
4
Complex societies : The evolutionary origins of a crude superorganism.复杂社会:一种原始超级生物体的进化起源
Hum Nat. 1999 Sep;10(3):253-89. doi: 10.1007/s12110-999-1004-y.
5
The natural selection of altruistic traits.利他性状的自然选择。
Hum Nat. 1999 Sep;10(3):205-52. doi: 10.1007/s12110-999-1003-z.
6
Strong reciprocity, human cooperation, and the enforcement of social norms.强互惠、人类合作与社会规范的执行
Hum Nat. 2002 Mar;13(1):1-25. doi: 10.1007/s12110-002-1012-7.
7
Emotions and actions associated with norm-breaking events.与违反规范事件相关的情绪和行为。
Hum Nat. 2003 Sep;14(3):277-304. doi: 10.1007/s12110-003-1007-z.
8
Social network size in humans.人类的社交网络规模。
Hum Nat. 2003 Mar;14(1):53-72. doi: 10.1007/s12110-003-1016-y.
9
Why do good hunters have higher reproductive success?为什么优秀的猎手有更高的繁殖成功率?
Hum Nat. 2004 Dec;15(4):343-64. doi: 10.1007/s12110-004-1013-9.
10
Experimental studies of group selection: what do they tell us about group selection in nature?群体选择的实验研究:它们能告诉我们关于自然界中群体选择的哪些信息?
Am Nat. 1997 Jul;150 Suppl 1:S59-79. doi: 10.1086/286050.