Zapata Lauren B, Tregear Stephen J, Curtis Kathryn M, Tiller Marie, Pazol Karen, Mautone-Smith Nancy, Gavin Loretta E
Division of Reproductive Health, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia.
Manila Consulting Group, Inc., McLean, Virginia.
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Aug;49(2 Suppl 1):S31-45. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.03.023.
This systematic review evaluated the evidence on the impact of contraceptive counseling provided in clinical settings on reproductive health outcomes to provide information to guide national recommendations on quality family planning services.
Multiple databases were searched during 2010-2011 for peer-reviewed articles published in English from January 1985 through February 2011 describing studies that evaluated contraceptive counseling interventions in clinical settings. Studies were excluded if they focused primarily on prevention of HIV or sexually transmitted infections, focused solely on men, or were conducted outside the U.S., Canada, Europe, Australia, or New Zealand.
The initial search identified 12,327 articles, of which 22 studies (from 23 articles) met the inclusion criteria. Six studies examined the impact of contraceptive counseling among adolescents, with four finding a significant positive impact on at least one outcome of interest. Sixteen studies examined the impact of counseling among adults or mixed populations (adults and adolescents), with 11 finding a significant positive impact on at least one outcome of interest.
Promising components of contraceptive counseling were identified despite the diversity of interventions and inability to compare the relative effectiveness of one approach versus another. The evidence base would be strengthened by improved documentation of counseling procedures; assessment of intervention implementation and fidelity to put study findings into context; and development and inclusion of more RCTs, studies conducted among general samples of women, and studies with sample sizes sufficient to detect important behavioral outcomes at least 12 months post-intervention.
本系统评价评估了临床环境中提供的避孕咨询对生殖健康结局影响的证据,以提供信息指导国家关于优质计划生育服务的建议。
在2010 - 2011年期间检索了多个数据库,以查找1985年1月至2011年2月以英文发表的同行评审文章,这些文章描述了评估临床环境中避孕咨询干预措施的研究。如果研究主要关注艾滋病毒或性传播感染的预防、仅关注男性或在美国、加拿大、欧洲、澳大利亚或新西兰以外进行,则将其排除。
初步检索识别出12327篇文章,其中22项研究(来自23篇文章)符合纳入标准。六项研究考察了青少年中避孕咨询的影响,四项研究发现对至少一项感兴趣的结局有显著的积极影响。十六项研究考察了成人或混合人群(成人和青少年)中咨询的影响,十一项研究发现对至少一项感兴趣的结局有显著的积极影响。
尽管干预措施多样且无法比较一种方法与另一种方法的相对有效性,但仍确定了避孕咨询中一些有前景的组成部分。通过改进咨询程序的记录;评估干预措施的实施情况和保真度以将研究结果置于背景中;以及开展和纳入更多的随机对照试验、在一般女性样本中进行的研究以及样本量足以在干预后至少12个月检测到重要行为结局的研究,证据基础将得到加强。